Opinion

Henderson, Debbie v. South Central Communications

  • 2017 TN WC 221
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Dec 4, 2017
Status
Published
On the bench
Kenneth M. Switzer
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

December 4~ 2017

TN COURT Of

li\ ORKE.RS' C OMPlNSATIO

CL.AIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT NASHVILLE

Debbie Henderson, ) Docket No. 2017-06-1090

Employee, )

v. )

South Central Communications, ) State File No. 54600-2016

Employer, )

And )

Cincinnati Ins. Co., ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer

Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING MEDICAL BENEFITS

This matter came before the Court on November 30, 2017, on Ms. Henderson's

Request for Expedited Hearing. The present focus of this case is whether she is entitled

to additional medical benefits, specifically knee and shoulder surgery, and temporary

total disability benefits. The central legal issue is whether Ms. Henderson demonstrated

she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits that her present need for the proposed

treatment relates to the work accident. The Court holds Ms. Henderson satisfied her

burden regarding causation and is therefore entitled to the proposed surgeries as well as

temporary total disability benefits. 1

History of Claim

On July 19, 2016, Ms. Henderson fell at work. South Central accepted the claim,

and she came under the care of Dr. Ronald Derr as the authorized treating physician. He

provided conservative treatment for several months.

As for Ms. Henderson's present request for medical benefits, on February 16,

1

Ms. Henderson's Affidavit states that she also seeks a penalty for wrongful termination of temporary

disability benefits, but her counsel did not argue her entitlement to this at the hearing. Thus, the Court

considers it waived at this time.

1

2017, Dr. Derr responded to a letter from the carrier as follows: 2

The injuries she sustained to her right shoulder, left knee, left hand, and

right foot all came from her fall that she had in July 2016. She may have

had some pre-existing changes in her knee, but they were aggravated to the

point of requiring surgery due to that fall. Her shoulder is not an arthritic

issue, it is more of a soft tissue impingement tissue [sic] of the rotator cuff

and also some arthritic changes of the AC joint. Those were also non-

symptomatic issues until her fall in July 2016.

I feel strongly that both of these injuries ... all came from that injury.

(Emphasis added.) He recommended shoulder surgery and surgical evaluation of the

knee while under anesthesia. He repeated these recommendations in his February 21 and

June 26 notes.

As for Ms. Henderson's request for temporary disability benefits, the parties

agreed that she is entitled to them if the Court finds causation. Dr. Derr took her off work

on August 10. The last off-work slip in the record, dated February 16, 2017, took Ms.

Henderson off work for eight weeks. According to Ms. Henderson, South Central

terminated temporary disability benefits on March 1, 2017. The Notice of Controversy

stated, "Etiology of the current complaints not related to injury by accident[.]"

According to the wage statement, Ms. Henderson's average weekly wage was $858.72,

so her compensation rate is $572.48 weekly or $81.78 per day.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

The Workers' Compensation Law defines "injury" as an injury by accident arising

primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment that causes the need for

medical treatment. An aggravation of a pre-existing condition is a compensable injury

when "it can be shown to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that the aggravation

arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment." Tenn. Code Ann. §

50-6-102(14)(A) (2017).

As the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board explained in Miller v. Lowe's

Home Centers, Inc. , 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 40, at *13 (Oct. 21, 2015),

"[A]n employee can satisfy the burden of proving a compensable aggravation if: (1) there

is expert medical proof that the work accident "contributed more than fifty percent

(50%)" in causing the aggravation, and (2) the work accident was the cause of the

aggravation "more likely than not considering all causes." However, an employee need

not prove each and every element of his or her claim by a preponderance of the evidence

2

Neither party introduced the carrier's letter.

2

at an expedited hearing to obtain temporary disability or medical benefits but "must come

forward with sufficient evidence from which the court can conclude that he or she is

likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits, consistent with Tennessee Code Annotated

section 50-6-239(d)(l)." !d., citing McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN

Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Here, Dr. Derr maintained in his letter to the adjuster that the need for the

proposed treatment-shoulder and knee surgery- relates to the work accident. He

acknowledged the presence of "some pre-existing changes in her knee, but they were

aggravated to the point of requiring surgery due to that fall." (Emphasis added.) Dr.

Derr further wrote that her shoulder problem "is not an arthritic issue, it is more of a soft

tissue impingement tissue [sic] of the rotator cuff and also some arthritic changes of the

AC joint. Those were also non-symptomatic issues until her fall in July 2016." His

opinions relate the need for surgery for both the knee and shoulder to the work accident

in layperson's language.

South Central acknowledged that Dr. Derr was not required to couch his opinion

verbatim to the statutory definition of a compensable injury under Panzarella v.

Amazon. com, Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 30, at* 13 (May 15, 2017):

[A] physician may render an opinion that meets the legal standard espoused

in section 50-6-102(14) without couching the opinion in a rigid recitation of

the statutory definition. What is necessary, however, is sufficient proof

from which the trial court can conclude that the statutory requirements of

an injury as defined in section 50-6-102(14) are satisfied.

However, South Central emphasized that Dr. Derr's records contain references to the

preexisting nature of Ms. Henderson's need for surgery, so that Ms. Henderson failed to

satisfy her burden on causation. The Court read these records in their entirety and

disagrees. Rather, the overarching theme from the medical records is that Ms. Henderson

suffered a compensable aggravation of "preexisting changes" in her knee as defined in

the statute and further explained in Miller. The records also substantiate that Dr. Derr

believes the need for shoulder surgery arose primarily out of and in the course and scope

of employment. He wrote that her condition was not an "arthritic issue" but a soft-tissue

impingement that was not symptomatic until after the fall at work. Dr. Derr felt

"strongly" that the fall caused the need for surgery. He noted the preexisting conditions

and ruled them out as the primary cause of the need for treatment for both the knee and

shoulder.

Thus, the Court finds that Ms. Henderson is likely to prevail at a hearing on the

merits that her current need for treatment - shoulder and knee surgery - arises primarily

out of her employment. Therefore, the Court grants her requests for additional medical

benefits, including the proposed surgeries.

3

Finally, as to her request for temporary disability benefits, Ms. Henderson must

show: (1) she became disabled from working due to a compensable injury; (2) there is a

causal connection between her injury and his inability to work; and (3) the duration of the

period of disability. Jones v. Crencor, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7

(Dec. 11, 2015).

Applying these factors, no one disputes that Ms. Henderson became disabled due

to a compensable fall at work, and the Court finds that her current need for treatment is

causally-related to the work accident. As for the duration of disability, the February 16

off-work slip removed Ms. Henderson from work for eight weeks, resulting in

entitlement to temporary disability benefits totaling $4,579.68. However, since South

Central paid her until terminating benefits on March 1, it is entitled to thirteen days'

credit, or $1,063.14. Ms. Henderson's net temporary total disability award is $3,516.54.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. South Central or its workers' compensation carrier shall provide Ms. Henderson

with additional medical benefits, to include the recommended shoulder and knee

surgenes.

2. South Central or its workers' compensation carrier shall pay past temporary total

disability benefits to Ms. Henderson in a lump sum of$3,515.54.

3. This matter is set for a Status Conference on February 5, 2018, at 10:15 a.m.

Central Time. The parties must call 615-532-9552 or toll-free at 866-943-0025

to participate. Failure to call may result in a determination of the issues without

the party's participation.

4. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance

with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry

of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3).

The Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit confirmation of compliance

with this Order to the Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no

later than the seventh business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the

necessary confirmation within the period of compliance may result in a penalty

assessment for non-compliance. For questions regarding compliance, please

contact the Workers' Compensation Compliance Unit vta email

WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.

ENTERED December 4, 2017.

4

APPENDIX

Evidence:

1. Ms. Henderson's Declaration

2. First Report oflnjury

3. Wage Statement

4. Dr. Derr's Medical records

5. Composite Medical Records filed by the Employer

Technical Record:

1. Petition for Benefit Determination

2. Dispute Certification Notice

3. Request for Expedited Hearing

4. Employer Pre-Hearing Statement

5. Employer Witness List

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent to the following

recipients by these methods of service on December 4, 2017.

Name Certified Via Fax Via Service Sent to:

Mail Email

Zach Wiley, X zwiley@forthegeoQle.com;

Employee's rforrest@forthegeogle.com

attorney

Leslie Bishop, X lbishog@lewisthomason.com;

Employer's rlee@lewisthomason.com

Attorney

UM, CLERK OF COURT

Court of orkers' Compensation Claims

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

5

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.