Opinion

Williams, Gregory v. NewEgg Inc.

  • 2015 TN WC 163
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Nov 9, 2015
Status
Published
On the bench
Jim Umsted
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 12.4%

The opinion

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MEMPHIS

Gregory Williams, ) Docket No.: 2015-08-0305

Employee, )

v. ) State File Number: 37336-2015

New Egg, Inc., )

Employer, ) Judge Jim Umsted

And )

Chubb Group, )

Insurance Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING MEDICAL BENEFITS

This matter came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge on the

Request for Expedited Hearing filed by the employee, Gregory Williams, pursuant to

Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239 (2014). Mr. Williams seeks medical and

temporary disability benefits for a left shoulder injury. The employer, NewEgg, Inc.,

denied compensability of Mr. Williams' claim. The central legal issues are whether Mr.

Williams provided adequate notice of his alleged injury to NewEgg, and whether the

alleged injury primarily arose out of and in the course and scope of Mr. Williams'

employment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds Mr. Williams' claim is

compensable, that he provided a reasonable excuse for late notice, that he is entitled to

medical benefits, but that he failed to submit sufficient evidence showing entitlement to

temporary disability benefits. 1

History of Claim

Mr. Williams is a fifty-year-old resident of Shelby County, Tennessee. He alleged

an injury to his left shoulder on November 14, 2014, while lifting boxes at work, and

while temporarily working out of his regular job assignment. According to Mr. Williams,

he immediately reported his injury to his temporary supervisor, Sandra Jones. However,

Ms. Jones denied that Mr. Williams told her he sustained a job-related injury, and in any

event, she was not his official supervisor. Mr. Williams testified he thought his injury

1

A complete listing of the technical record and exhibits admitted at the Expedited Hearing is attached to this Order

as an appendix.

1

was minor, so he did not seek medical treatment through NewEgg. Instead, he treated

with his primary care physician, Dr. Gina Hanissian, at Hanissian Health Care. Dr.

Hanissian referred Mr. Williams to an orthopedic specialist, and he began treating with

Dr. David Brown at OrthoMemphis on March 27,2015.

Dr. Brown diagnosed Mr. Williams with left shoulder impingement syndrome and

bursitis and treated him conservatively with injections, medication, and a home exercise

program until April 17, 2015. On that date, Dr. Brown noted that Mr. Williams had not

improved with conservative measures, and he ordered an MRI. Following his visit with

Dr. Brown, Mr. Williams spoke to managers Damion Wintery and Carnell McFadden

about his continuing shoulder problems. At that time, NewEgg sent Mr. Williams to

Concentra Medical Centers for an evaluation of his left shoulder. 2 Dr. Tracye Kyles at

Concentra diagnosed Mr. Williams with a shoulder strain and referred him to an

orthopedic specialist.

Mr. Williams underwent an MRI of his left shoulder on April 22, 2015. It

revealed a normal rotator cuff but showed extensive labral degeneration or a

nondisplaced labral tear involving the biceps anchor and posterior and inferior labrum.

When Mr. Williams presented to Dr. Brown on May 5, 2015, Dr. Brown diagnosed him

with a left shoulder SLAP tear and labral tear. However, Dr. Brown indicated that Mr.

Williams' pain had improved and that he could return as needed if his symptoms

worsened.

Mr. Williams filed a Petition for Benefit Determination (PBD) seeking medical

and temporary disability benefits. The parties did not resolve the disputed issues through

mediation, and the Mediating Specialist filed a Dispute Certification Notice (DCN). Mr.

Williams filed a Request for Expedited Hearing, and this Court heard the matter on

October 26, 2015. At the Expedited Hearing, Mr. Williams asserted that he sustained a

job-related injury, gave proper notice, and his claim should be deemed compensable.

NewEgg countered that Mr. Williams failed to give notice of his injury as required by

statute and his claim should be denied.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

The Workers' Compensation Law shall not be remedially or liberally construed in

favor of either party but shall be construed fairly, impartially and in accordance with

basic principles of statutory construction favoring neither the employee nor

employer. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-116 (2014). The employee in a workers'

compensation claim has the burden of proof on all essential elements of a claim. Tindall

v. Waring Park Ass 'n, 725 S.W.2d 935, 937 (Tenn. 1987); 3 Scott v. Integrity Staffing

2

A dispute exists as to whether Mr. Williams received a panel of physicians from NewEgg.

3

The Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board allows reliance on precedent from the Tennessee Supreme

Court "unless it is evident that the Supreme Court's decision or rationale relied on a remedial interpretation of pre-

2

Solutions, No. 2015-01-0055, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Tenn.

Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Aug. 18, 2015). An employee need not prove every element

of his or her claim by a preponderance of the evidence in order to obtain relief at an

expedited hearing. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015

TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27,

20 15). At an expedited hearing, an employee has the burden to come forward with

sufficient evidence from which the trial court can determine that the employee is likely to

prevail at a hearing on the merits. !d.

At the expedited hearing, Mr. Williams testified credibly that he injured his left

shoulder while working on November 14, 2014. No contrary evidence was submitted.

Thus, the Court finds that Mr. Williams sustained a work-related injury on that date.

Having so found, the Court must determine whether Mr. Williams is precluded from

receiving workers' compensation benefits based upon improper notice.

Tennessee Code Annotated§ 50-6-20l(a)(l) (2014) provides:

Every injured employee or the injured employee's representative shall,

immediately upon the occurrence of an injury, or as soon thereafter as is

reasonable and practicable, give or cause to be given to the employer who

has no actual notice, written notice of the injury, and the employee shall not

be entitled to physician's fees or to any compensation that may have

accrued under this chapter, Porn the date of the accident to the giving of

notice, unless it can be shown that the employer had actual knowledge of

the accident. No compensation shall be payable under this chapter, unless

the written notice is given to the employer within thirty (30) days after the

occurrence of the accident, unless reasonable excuse for failure to give the

notice is made to the satisfaction of the tribunal to which the claim for

compensation may be presented. (Emphasis added.)

It is the determination of the Court that Mr. Williams did not properly report his

job injury until after his April 17, 2015 visit with Dr. Brown, when he first learned that

his condition might be more serious than he initially thought. Until that time, he might

have mentioned to a temporary supervisor, Sandra Jones, that his arm hurt, but she was

not his direct supervisor, and he did not complete a written incident report or request

medical treatment. The Court finds, however, that Mr. Williams' explanation for his

delay in giving proper notice was reasonable under the circumstances, as he believed his

injury was minor and temporary. Finally, on April 17, 2015, after his left shoulder pain

did not improve, Mr. Williams reported his work injury to his supervisors at NewEgg.

July 1, 2014 statutes, that it relied on specific statutory language no longer contained in the Workers' Compensation

Law, and/or that it relied on an analysis that has since been addressed by the general assembly through statutory

amendments." McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

LEXIS 6, *13 n.4 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015).

3

Thereafter, an injury report was completed, and NewEgg provided Mr. Williams

authorized medical treatment at Concentra.

NewEgg filed a notice of denial of Mr. Williams' claim on July 17, 2015, on the

basis "[T]here is no clear mechanism of injury. This claimant was injured on 11119/14,

but did not report the injury until April2015." Pursuant to the requirement of Tennessee

Code Annotated section 50-6-201(a)(l), the Court finds that Mr. Williams provided a

reasonable excuse for his delay in giving notice of his injury and, therefore, his claim is

not barred. It has not been shown that NewEgg had actual notice of the injury, and the

first legally sufficient notice of the claim was given by Mr. Williams on April 17, 20 15.

Therefore, pursuant to statute, Mr. Williams is not entitled to benefits before that date.

The parties stipulated that the medical treatment at Concentra was authorized. The

physicians at Concentra referred Mr. Williams to an orthopedic specialist. Dr. Hanissian,

Mr. Williams' personal physician, also referred Mr. Williams to an orthopedic group,

OrthoMemphis. Mr. Williams is currently a patient of Dr. Brown at OrthoMemphis. The

Court finds it appropriate to designate Dr. Brown as Mr. Williams' authorized treating

physician, and NewEgg shall be responsible for medical treatment expense with

Concentra and Dr. Brown/OrthoMemphis. Mr. Williams has not presented evidence

showing that he is entitled to temporary disability benefits at this time.

Therefore, the Court concludes that Mr. Williams has come forward with

sufficient evidence to show that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits as to

compensability. Thus, his request for medical benefits is granted. However, due to a lack

of medical evidence showing any periods of disability at this time, his request for

temporary disability benefits is denied.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. NewEgg or its workers' compensation carrier shall provide Mr. Williams

reasonable and necessary medical treatment for his work injury pursuant to Tennessee

Code Annotated section 50-6-204 (2014), to be initiated by NewEgg or its workers'

compensation carrier providing Mr. Williams with continued medical treatment with Dr.

Brown at OrthoMemphis who is designated as the authorized treating physician. Further,

NewEgg or its workers' compensation carrier shall pay Mr. Williams' medical bills for

treatment rendered after April 17, 2015, for his work injury. Mr. Williams or the medical

providers shall furnish the medical bills to NewEgg or its workers' compensation carrier.

2. Mr. Williams' request for temporary disability benefits is denied. At this time,

Mr. Williams has not come forward with sufficient evidence from which the Court may

conclude he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits on this issue.

4

3. This matter is set for an Initial (Scheduling) Hearing on December 9, 2015, at 1:30

p.m. central time.

4. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance

with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry of this

Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3) (2014). The

Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit confirmation of compliance with this

Order to the Bureau by email to WCComplianc .Program@tn.gov no later than the

seventh business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary

confirmation within the period of compliance may result in a penalty assessment for non-

compliance.

5. For questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers' Compensation

Compliance Unit via email WC ompliance. Program@t n. gov or by calling (615) 253-

1471 or (615) 532-1309.

ENTERED this the 5th day of November, 2015.

Initial (Scheduling) Hearing:

An Initial (Scheduling) Hearing has been set with Judge Jim Umsted, Court of

Workers' Compensation Claims. You must call 615-532-9550 or toll-free at 866-

943-0014 to participate in the Initial Hearing.

Please Note: You must call in on the scheduled date/time to

participate. Failure to call in may result in a determination of the issues without

your further participation.

Right to Appeal:

Tennessee Law allows any party who disagrees with this Expedited Hearing Order

to appeal the decision to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. To file a Notice of

Appeal, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: "Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal."

5

2. File the completed form with the Court Clerk within seven business days of the

date the Workers' Compensation Judge entered the Expedited Hearing Order.

3. Serve a copy of the Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal upon the opposing party.

4. The appealing party is responsible for payment of a filing fee in the amount of

$75.00. Within ten calendar days after the filing of a notice of appeal, payment

must be received by check, money order, or credit card payment. Payments can be

made in person at any Bureau office or by United States mail, hand-delivery, or

other delivery service. In the alternative, the appealing party may file an Affidavit

of Indigency, on a form prescribed by the Bureau, seeking a waiver of the filing

fee. The Affidavit of lndigency may be filed contemporaneously with the Notice

of Appeal or must be filed within ten calendar days thereafter. The Appeals Board

will consider the Affidavit of Indigency and issue an Order granting or denying

the request for a waiver of the filing fee as soon thereafter as is

practicable. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of

Indigency in accordance with this section shall result in dismissal of the

appeal.

5. The parties, having the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal,

may request, from the Court Clerk, the audio recording of the hearing for the

purpose of having a transcript prepared by a licensed court reporter and filing it

with the Court Clerk within ten calendar days of the filing of the Expedited

Hearing Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, the parties may file a joint statement of

the evidence within ten calendar days of the filing of the Expedited Hearing

Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and

accurate account of what transpired in the Court of Workers' Compensation

Claims and must be approved by the workers' compensation judge before the

record is submitted to the Clerk of the Appeals Board.

6. If the appellant elects to file a position statement in support of the interlocutory

appeal, the appellant shall file such position statement with the Court Clerk within

three business days of the expiration of the time to file a transcript or statement of

the evidence, specifying the issues presented for review and including any

argument in support thereof. A party opposing the appeal shall file a response, if

any, with the Court Clerk within three business days of the filing of the appellant's

position statement. All position statements pertaining to an appeal of an

interlocutory order should include: (1) a statement summarizing the facts of the

case from the evidence admitted during the expedited hearing; (2) a statement

summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of the expedited hearing; (3) a

statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an argument, citing

appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

6

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Affidavit of Gregory Williams;

2. Form C-31 Medical Waiver and Consent;

3. Form C-20 Employer's First Report of Work Injury or Illness;

4. Form C-23 Notice ofDenial of Claim for Compensation;

5. Form C-41 Wage Statement;

6. Correspondence dated July 29, 2015, from Dr. Gina Hanissian at Hanissian Health

Care;

7. Medical record from Concentra Medical Centers, dated April 17, 2015;

8. Medical records from OrthoMemphis, dated March 27, April 17, April 22, and

May 5, 2015;

9. Affidavit of Kranise Hawthorne; and

10. OrthoMemphis report dated May 5, 2015. 4

Technical record: 5

1. Petition for Benefit Determination

2. Dispute Certification Notice

3. Request for Expedited Hearing

4. NewEgg, Inc.'s position statement of September 10, 2015

4

The Court did not admit Exhibit 10 into evidence but marked it for identification only.

5

The Court did not consider attachments to Technical Record filings unless admitted into evidence during the

Expedited Hearing. The Court considered factual statements in these filings, or any attachments to them, as

allegations unless established by the evidence.

7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was

sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service on this the 5th day of

November, 2015.

Name Certified Via Via Service sent to:

Mail Fax Email

David A. E. Lumb, X dl@darrellcastle.com

Employee's Counsel

Adrienne Fazio, X afazio@manierherod.com

Employer's Counsel

1

Penny SbrJm, Clerk of Court

Court of Workers' Compensation Claims

WC.Cou.-tCierk@tn.gov

8

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.