Opinion

Peeples, Ernest v. Baptist Memorial Hospital

  • 2015 TN WC 155
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Nov 5, 2015
Status
Published
On the bench
Amber E. Luttrell
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 12.4%

The opinion

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MEMPHIS

ERNEST PEEPLES ) Docket No.: 2015-08-0268

Employee, )

v. ) State File No.: 31748-2015

)

BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ) Judge Amber E. Luttrell

MEMPHIS )

Employer, )

And )

)

BRENTWOOD SERVICES ADMIN. )

TPA. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING MEDICAL AND TEMPORARY

DISABILITY BENEFITS

(RECORD REVIEW ONLY)

THIS CAUSE came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge upon

the Request for Expedited Hearing (REH) filed by the employee, Ernest Peeples,

pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239 (20 14). Mr. Peeples seeks

medical and temporary disability benefits. Mr. Peeples requested the Court render its

decision based upon a review of the case file without an evidentiary hearing. Baptist

Memorial Hospital did not object to this request. 1

Upon review of the file, the Court finds that no affidavit accompanied Mr.

Peeples' REH as required by Tennessee Compilation Rules and Regulations 0800-02-21-

.14(l)(a) (2015). Thus, the Court must deny Mr. Peeples' REH at this time. Even if Mr.

Peeples' REH complied with the procedural affidavit requirement, the Court further finds

the record is insufficient at this time to prove Mr. Peeples is likely to prevail at a hearing

on the merits on the issue of compensability.

1

By making an on-the-record determination, the Court makes no decision as to the admissibility of the information

submitted in the case file absent an objection from a party. The Court notes in this case the parties did not raise any

objection to admissibility of any information in the file; therefore, the Court reviewed and considered the entire case

file in making its determination.

History of Claim

Mr. Peeples is a fifty-seven-year-old resident of Shelby County, Tennessee. (T.R.

1.) He worked as a floor finisher for Baptist Memorial Hospital-Memphis. !d. Mr.

Peeples alleged a work injury to his right knee. !d. Mr. Peeples stated in a recorded

statement taken by the workers' compensation carrier that on the date of injury he was

waiting on the floor to dry when his right leg just gave out. (Ex. 7 at 3.) Baptist denied

the claim stating, "Claim does not appear to be compensable. Not specific cause of

Ernest's right knee giving out." (Ex. 4.)

Mr. Peeples filed a Petition for Benefit Determination (PBD)(T.R. 1.) Mr. Peeples

described the alleged injury in the PBD by stating, "Over years in the position as a floor

care employee the condition of my injury knee is in relationship of the job at Baptist

Hospital." !d. The parties did not resolve the disputed issues through mediation, and the

Mediation Specialist filed a DCN on August 13, 2015. (T.R. 2.)

Mr. Peeples filed an REH on September 18, 2015. (T.R. 3.) In its response to Mr.

Peeples' REH, Baptist raised the issue that Mr. Peeples did not file the required

supporting affidavit in compliance with Tennessee Compilation Rules and Regulations

0800-02-21-.14(l)(a) (2015). (T.R. 4.) Baptist further contended that Mr. Peeples failed

to meet his burden of proving a compensable work injury to his knee in the course and

scope of his employment with Baptist. !d.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

The Workers' Compensation Law shall not be remedially or liberally construed in

favor of either party but shall be construed fairly, impartially and in accordance with

basic principles of statutory construction favoring neither the employee nor employer.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-116 (2014). The employee in a workers' compensation claim

has the burden of proof on all essential elements of a claim. Tindall v. Waring Park

Ass'n, 725 S.W.2d 935, 937 (Tenn. 1987); Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, No. 2015-

01-0055, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App.

Bd. Aug. 18, 20 15). An employee need not prove every element of his or her claim by a

preponderance of the evidence in order to obtain relief at an expedited hearing. McCord

v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015). At an expedited

hearing, an employee has the burden to come forward with sufficient evidence from

which the trial court can determine that the employee is likely to prevail at a hearing on

the merits. !d.

In Hadzic v. Averitt Express, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

specifically addressed the need for supporting affidavits to an REH. Hadzic v. Averitt

Express, No. 2014-02-0664, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 14, at *7-8 (Tenn.

2

Workers' Comp. App. Bd. May 18, 2015). The Board cited Tennessee Compilation Rules

and Regulations 0800-02-21-.14(1) (a) (2015) as follows:

( 1) After a case is placed on the docket, if there is a dispute over temporary

disability or medical benefits, either party may request an expediting [sic]

hearing of the issue of temporary disability or medical benefits by

indicating its desire for an expedited hearing on the request for hearing

form or by a [sic] filing a separate motion. The indication of the desire for

an expedited hearing on the request for hearing form shall serve as the

motion for expedited hearing.

(a) All motions for expedited hearing must be accompanied by affidavits

and any other information demonstrating that the employee is entitled to

temporary disability or medical benefits.

(Emphasis added.) !d. The Board held that the words "all" and "must" in the rule require

that an affidavit accompany every REH, without exception, for it to be valid. !d. at *10.

The Board further determined the rule is more than a "mere technicality," but "is

intended to provide for the efficient and expedient resolution of disputed issues." !d.

(citing Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0800-02-21-.01 (2015)). The Board held the regulation

was designed to encourage "litigants to be proactive from the outset in obtaining and

organizing evidence supporting the claim," as well as notifYing the other party of facts

being asserted, so they may "prepare for the hearing or otherwise respond as they are

expected to do." !d. at * 11.

Had Mr. Peeples satisfied the procedural affidavit requirement, he still did not

submit any medical records or evidence in support of his claim from which the Court

could conclude that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits on the issue of

compensability. The only documents submitted by Mr. Peeples were work status notes

from OrthoMemphis, a Baptist leave of absence request form and Aetna Insurance

Company explanation of benefits forms. While potentially relevant to the issue of

entitlement to temporary disability benefits, those documents do not support Mr. Peeples'

claim that he sustained a compensable work injury to his knee arising out of and in the

course and scope of his employment.

In sum, the Court finds Mr. Peeples did not file the required affidavit or otherwise

come forward with medical proof or any evidence in support of his claim for medical and

temporary disability benefits. Accordingly, Mr. Peeples' request for medical and

temporary disability benefits is denied.

3

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Mr. Peeples' request for medical and temporary disability benefits is denied at this

time.

2. This matter is set for an Initial (Scheduling) Hearing on January 4, 2016 at 10 a.m.

(CDT).

ENTERED this the 5th day oa:ber, 2015.

lhlk£~

J udge Amber E. Luttrell

Court of Workers' Compensation Claims

lnitial (Scheduling) Hearing:

An Initial (Scheduling) Hearing has been set with Judge Amber E. Luttrell,

Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. You must call 901-543-2668 or toll-free at

855-543-5046 to participate.

Please Note: You must call in on the scheduled date/time to

participate. Failure to call in may result in a determination of the issues without

your further participation. All conferences are set using Central Time (CT).

Right to Appeal:

Tennessee Law allows any party who disagrees with this Expedited Hearing Order

to appeal the decision to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. To file a Notice of

Appeal, you must:

l. Complete the enclosed form entitled: "Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal."

2. File the completed form with the Court Clerk within seven business days of the

date the Workers' Compensation Judge entered the Expedited Hearing Order.

3. Serve a copy of the Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal upon the opposing party.

4. The appealing party is responsible for payment of a fiJing fee in the amount of

$75.00. Within ten calendar days after the filing of a notice of appeal, payment

must be received by check, money order, or credit card payment. Payments can be

4

made in person at any Bureau office or by United States mail, hand-delivery, or

other delivery service. In the alternative, the appealing party may file an Affidavit

of Indigency, on a form prescribed by the Bureau, seeking a waiver of the filing

fee. The Affidavit of Indigency may be filed contemporaneously with the Notice

of Appeal or must be filed within ten calendar days thereafter. The Appeals Board

will consider the Affidavit of Indigency and issue an Order granting or denying

the request for a waiver of the filing fee as soon thereafter as is

practicable. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of

Indigency in accordance with this section shall result in dismissal of the

appeal.

5. The parties, having the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal,

may request, from the Court Clerk, the audio recording of the hearing for the

purpose of having a transcript prepared by a licensed court reporter and filing it

with the Court Clerk within ten calendar days of the filing of the Expedited

Hearing Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, the parties may file a joint statement of

the evidence within ten calendar days of the filing of the Expedited Hearing

Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and

accurate account of what transpired in the Court of Workers' Compensation

Claims and must be approved by the workers' compensation judge before the

record is submitted to the Clerk of the Appeals Board.

6. If the appellant elects to file a position statement in support of the interlocutory

appeal, the appellant shall file such position statement with the Court Clerk within

three business days of the expiration of the time to file a transcript or statement of

the evidence, specifYing the issues presented for review and including any

argument in support thereof. A party opposing the appeal shall file a response, if

any, with the Court Clerk within three business days of the filing of the appellant's

position statement. All position statements pertaining to an appeal of an

interlocutory order should include: (1) a statement summarizing the facts of the

case from the evidence admitted during the expedited hearing; (2) a statement

summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of the expedited hearing; (3) a

statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an argument, citing

appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

5

APPENDIX

The Court reviewed the following documents and designates these documents as the

Technical Record?

1. Petition for Benefit Determination (PBD), filed July 15, 2015

2. Dispute Certification Notice (DCN), filed August 13, 2015

3. Request for Expedited Hearing (REH), filed September 18, 2015

4. Employer's Response to REH

5. Employer's Position Statement in Response to PBD

The Court reviewed the following documents in reaching its decision and designates the

documents as Exhibits solely for ease of reference by the Court:

1. OrthoMemphis work status notes, Baptist leave of absence request form, and

Aetna Insurance Company Explanation ofBenefits forms (collective exhibit)

2. C20 Employer First Report of Work Injury

3. Baptist Employee Occurrence Report

4. C23 Notice of Denial, dated March 13, 2015

5. C41 Wage Statement

6. Job Description of Floor Finisher

7. Recorded statement transcript of Mr. Peeples, dated March 12, 2015

2

The Court did not consider attachments to Technical Record filings unless admitted into evidence during the

Expedited Hearing. The Court considered factual statements in these filings or any attachments to them as

allegations unless established by the evidence.

6

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Expedited Hearing Order

Denying Medical Benefits was sent to the following recipients by the following methods

of service on this the _th

5 day ofNovember, 2015.

Name Certified Via Via Service sent to :

Mail Fax Email

Ernest Peeples, X X Emestgeeglesl @gmail.com;

Employee 1983 East Gladney Drive

Memphis, Tennessee 3 8114

J. Matthew Kirby, Esq., X mkirb:y(a).harrisshelton.com

Counsel for Employer

Penny Shrum, Clerk of Court

Court of Workers' Compensation Claims

WC.CourtCierk@tn.gov

7

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.