Opinion

Little, Deborah v. Sweet T’s

  • 2015 TN WC 3
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Jan 13, 2015
Status
Published
On the bench
Joshua Davis Baker
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 12.4%

The opinion

FlLED

.January 13. 2015

WORKERS• CO).lPE~SATlO~

CL~I\1~

Time: 7:15 .\\1

COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

DIVISION OF,¥0RKERS• COMPENSATION

EMPLOYEE: Deborah Little DOCKET#: 2014-06-0021

STATE FILE#: 70979-2014

EMPLOYER: Sweet T' sand DATE OF INJURY: August 17,2014

Andy Patel

CARRIER: Indemnity Insurance of

N o11h America

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge upon the

Request for Expedited Heruing filed on October 30, 2014, by Deborah Little (Employee) against

Sweet T's and Andy Patel (Employer). The Request for Expedited Heru·ing was filed pursuant

to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d) to consider whether Employee is entitled to

temporruy disability and medical benefits.

The undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge conducted a heru-ing via teleconference

on December 4 2014. Employee acted prose. Employer did not apperu·. After considering the

arguments, the applicable law, the testimony and all the evidence introduced at the Expedited

Hearing, the Court finds that Employee is entitled to medical benefits.

ANALYSIS

Issue

1. Whether Employer shall be required to provide Employee temporru·y disability benefits,

and, if so, the amount of those benefits and the pe1iod of time for which they are owed.

2. Whether Employer shall be required to provide medical benefits to Employee.

Evidence Submitted

Employee was the only party that attended the hearing. In addition to her testimony,

Employee entered the following exhibits into evidence:

Ex. 1 -Medical Bills

Ex. 2 -Medical Records

Ex. 3 -USPS Tracking Information

After the conclusion of the hearing, Employee submitted the following proof with leave of the

Court:

Ex. 4 - Statement of Jennifer Davis

Any other documents submitted to the clerk prior to the hearing that were not introduced as an

exhibit during the hearing were not considered.

History of Claim

At the time of the events giving rise to this claim, Employer operated two restaurants in

Tennessee. Employee worked as a server at Employer's Westmoreland location. She earned

$320 per week at the time of her injury.

On August 17, 2014, Employee entered the kitchen during her shift and slipped on some

water that had pooled on the floor in the area around the dishwashing station. Employee does

not remember the fall but her co-worker, Jennifer Davis, witnessed the accident and provided a

notarized statement. In that statement, Ms. Davis said she saw Employee slip in the area around

the dishwashing station. Employee's head bounced twice and she lost consciousness.

After Employee regained consciousness, one of her co-employees called an ambulance.

She was transported to Sumner Regional Medical Center (Sumner Regional) and stayed

overnight. Employee underwent a CT scan of her head and neck which revealed no acute

fractures. Employee also had stitches and suffered significant bruising of her face and left eye.

Employee was released from Sumner Regional on August 18, 2014. The providers at

Sumner Regional did not impose any work place restrictions on Employee. Employee owes

$2,676.58 for medical treatment associated with the accident. Employer told Employee that it

had workers' compensation insurance. However, the insurer refused to pay the Employee's

hospital bills.

Employee returned to work for Employer approximately two (2) weeks after she was

released from the hospital. Employer, however, closed its Westmoreland location shortly after

Employee returned to work so Employee no longer works for Employer.

2

Employee's Contentions

Employee alleges that she slipped in water that had pooled on the floor in the area around

the dishwashing station in the restaurant kitchen. Employee claims that she could not work for

two (2) weeks following the incident, and that she still suffers from headaches. Beyond the

emergency treatment she received immediately after the accident, Employee has not received

any medical care.

Employee requests that the Court order Employer to pay the medical expenses associated

with the accident. Employee also requests that the Court order Employer to pay her for the

wages she lost during the two (2) weeks Employee was unable to work.

Employer's Contentions

Employer did not appear at the hearing.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Standard Applied

When determining whether to award or deny benefits, a workers' compensation judge

must decide whether, based on the evidence introduced at the expedited hearing, the moving

party is likely to succeed on the merits at the compensation hearing. See generally. McCall v.

Nat"l Health Care Corp., 100 S.W. 3d 209, 214 (Tenn. 2003). In a workers' compensation

action, Employee shall bear the burden of proving each and every element of the claim by a

preponderance of the evidence. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6). Employee must show that

the injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment. Tenn. Code Ann. §

50-6-102(13).

Expedited hearings are governed by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)

which provides the following in pertinent part:

(1) Upon motion of either party made at any time after a dispute

certification notice has been issued by a workers' compensation

mediator, a workers' compensation judge may, at the judge's

discretion, hear disputes over issues provided in the dispute

certification notice concerning the provision of temporary

disability or medical benefits on an expedited basis and enter an

interlocutory order upon determining that the injured employee

would likely prevail at a hearing on the merits.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(l), (4). In addition, the "Mediation and Hearing Procedures"

governing practice in the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims provides the following:

3

After a case is placed on the docket, if there is a dispute over

temporary disability or medical benefits, either party may request

an expediting hearing of the issue of temporary disability or

medical benefits by indicating its desire for an expedited hearing

on the request for hearing form or by a filing a separate motion.

The indication of the desire for an expedited hearing on the request

for hearing form shall serve as the motion for expedited hearing.

Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs., 0800-02-21-.14(1).

Dispositive Factual Finding

The Court finds that Employee slipped and fell in standing water in the kitchen at work.

Employee hit her head on the floor when she fell. As a result of the fall, Employee lost

consciousness and suffered a cut to her head. Employee was transported to the hospital and

stayed there overnight. The physician treating Employee did not order that she be taken off from

work or impose any workplace restrictions. Employee incurred significant medical expenses for

treatment related to her injury. Employer's alleged workers' compensation insurance carrier did

not cover the cost of her treatment and the bills remain unpaid. Employer closed its restaurant in

Westmoreland. Employee no longer works for Employer. Employee still suffers from

headaches as a result of the accident.

Application ofLaw to Facts

Under the Tennessee Workers' Compensation law, an "injury" or "personal injury" by

accident is compensable whenever "the injury is caused by a specific incident, or set of incidents,

arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment." Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-

102(13) (2014). "An injury arises primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment

only if it has been shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the employment contributed

more than fifty percent (50%) in causing the injury, considering all causes[.]" Jd. (internal

quotations omitted).

Employee has alleged that she slipped and fell in some standing water at work.

Employee suffered a laceration to her head and was hospitalized overnight for treatment and

observation. The Court finds that Employee has alleged a prima facie case for a compensable

workers' compensation injury and is likely to prevail at trial. The Court, therefore, finds that

Employee is entitled to recover temporary workers' compensation benefits. Tennessee Code

Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(l) requires an employer to provide an injured employee

reasonable and necessary medical care for treatment of a compensable injury. Employee

presented evidence showing that she incurred $2,676.58 in medical bills that remain unpaid for

treatment of her injury. The Court orders Employer to cover the costs of Employee's treatment.

Employee shall furnish copies of the bills to Employer for payment.

Employee claims that she still suffers from headaches as a result of the accident. The

Court finds that Employee is entitled to continued care for her headaches and any other injuries

related to the workplace accident. Employer is hereby ordered to provide Employee a panel of

4

three physicians pracbcmg in Employee's community from which Employee shall select an

authorized treating physician. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(i). Employee shall pay

the costs of all reasonable and necessary care provided by the authorized treating physician.

Employee has also requested reimbursement of wages she lost while off from work

following her injury. Employee testified that she missed two (2) weeks of work because of her

injury. The Tennessee Workers' Compensation law does not provide direct reimbursement for

lost wages. Instead, an injured employee is entitled to receive temporary total disability benefits

pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 50-6-207(1) whenever the employee has suffered a

compensable, work-related injury that has rendered the employee unable to work. See Simpson

v. Satterfield, 564 S.W.2d 953 (Tenn. 1978). Entitlement to temporary total disability benefits

ends whenever an employee is able to return to work or reaches maximum medical improvement

(MMI). See id.; Cleek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 19 S.W.3d 770, 776 (Tenn. 2000).

Employee has not provided an opinion from a physician stating that she could not resume

working following her injury. The medical records provided by Employee show that the hospital

released her from care the day after her injury without imposing any restrictions on her activities.

Because Employee has not, at this time, submitted any medical proof to show that she was totally

disabled from working due to her injury, the Court finds that Employee is not entitled to recover

temporary disability benefits.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Employer shall pay Employee's medical bills in the amount of $2,676.58 associated

with treatment rendered to her to date for the workplace injury;

2. Employer shall provide Employee continuing treatment for her injury to be initiated

by providing Employee a panel of treating physicians, in accordance with the

requirements ofTennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(i), from which

Employee shall select an authorized treating physician;

3. Employer shall pay the cost of all reasonable and necessary medical care provided by

the authorized treating physician for the subject injury; and

4. Employee is not entitled to temporary disability benefits.

5. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance

with this Order must occur no later than seven (7) business days from the date of

entry of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-

239(d)(3). The Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit confirmation of

compliance with this Order to the Division by email

to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh (7th) business day

after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary confirmation within

the pe1iod of compliance may result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance.

5

6. For questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers' Compensation

Compliance Unit via email WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov or by calling (615) 253-

1471 or (615) 532-1309.

Initial Hearing:

An Initial Hearing has been set with Judge Joshua Davis Baker, Court of Workers

Compensation Claims, on March 2, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. Central Standard Time. You must call

615-741-2113 or toll free at 855-874-0474to participate in the Initial Hearing.

Please Note: You must call in on the scheduled date and time to participate. Failure to call in

may result in a determination of the issues without your further participation.

ISSUED AND FILED WITH THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS ON THE 13th DAY OF JANUARY, 2015.

Judge Joshua Davis Baker

Tennessee Court of Workers'

Compensation Claims

220 French Landing Drive

Nashville, TN 37243

6

Right to Appeal:

Tennessee Law allows any party who disagrees with this Expedited Hearing Order to appeal

the decision to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. To file a Notice of Appeal, you

must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: "Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal".

2. File the completed form with the Court Clerk within seven (7) business days of the date

the Expedited Hearing Order was entered by the Workers' Compensation Judge.

3. Serve a copy of the Request for Appeal upon the opposing party.

4. The parties, having the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal, may

request from the Court Clerk the audio recording of the hearing for the purpose of having

a transcript prepared by a licensed court reporter and filing it with the Court Clerk within

ten (10) calendar days of the filing of the Expedited Hearing Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, the parties may file a statement of the evidence within ten (1 0)

calendar days of the filing of the Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must be approved by the Judge before the record is submitted to the Clerk of

the Appeals Board.

5. If the appellant elects to file a position statement in support of the interlocutory appeal,

the appealing party shall file such position statement with the Court Clerk within three (3)

business days of the filing of the Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal, specifying the

issues presented for review and including any argument in support thereof. If the

appellee elects to file a response in opposition to the interlocutory appeal, appellee shall

do so within three (3) business days ofthe filing of the appellant's position statement.

7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby cettify that a true and cotTect copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent to

the following recipients by the following methods of se!Vice on this the 13th day of January,

2015.

Name Certified First Via Fax Via Email Address

Mail Class Fax Number Email

Mail

Deborah Little X Littlechic54@hotmail.com

Sweet T's and X 1555 btterstate Dl'ive, Cookeville,

Andy Patel TN38501

Joshua Davis Baker

Workers' Compensation Judge

8

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.