Opinion

Michael Webb v. William Newman

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Apr 16, 2020
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.5%

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2420

MICHAEL D. WEBB, d/b/a Major Mike Webb for U.S. Congress (VA8), d/b/a

Friends for Webb, a/k/a Major Mike Webb,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM NEWMAN, in his official and individual capacities; NOLAN

DAWKINS, in his official and individual capacities; MARK SCHWARTZ, in his

official and individual capacities; COUNTY OF ARLINGTON; MARK B. JINKS,

in his official and individual capacities; CITY OF ALEXANDRIA; PATRICK

MURPHY, in his official and individual capacities; LINDA ERDOS, in her official

and individual capacities; REID GOLDSTEIN, in his official and individual

capacities; BARBARA KANNINEN, in her official and individual capacities;

MONIQUE O’GRADY, in her official and individual capacities; ARLINGTON

PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARD; DONALD BEYER, in his official and individual

capacities; MICHAEL BROWN, in his official and individual capacities; MARK

ROBBINS, in his individual and official capacities; MURRAY “JAY” FARR, in his

individual and official capacities; ARLINGTON COUNTY POLICE

DEPARTMENT; BRYAN PORTER, in his official and individual capacities; THE

COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF

ALEXANDRIA; THEO STAMOS, in his official and individual capacities; THE

COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF

ARLINGTON; LOWELL FELD, in his official and individual capacities; BLUE

VIRGINIA; REESE BROOME, P.C.; BLANKENSHIP & KEITH P. C.; JOSEPH

WALTERS; JRW & ASSOCIATES; MARK HERRING, in his official and

individual capacities; OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; TIMOTHY

MICHAEL KAINE; MARK R. WARNER, in his official and individual capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00822-LO-TDB)

Submitted: April 14, 2020 Decided: April 16, 2020

Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael David Webb, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:

Michael D. Webb appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint

and denying his motions for temporary restraining orders. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, for the reasons stated by the district court, we

affirm the dismissal of Webb’s complaint. Webb v. Newman, No. 1:19-cv-00822-LO-TCB

(E.D. Va. filed Oct. 31, 2019 & entered Nov. 4, 2019). To the extent Webb appeals the

denial of his motions for temporary restraining orders, we lack jurisdiction to review the

order. See Office of Pers. Mgmt. v. Am. Fed’n of Gov’t Emps., 473 U.S. 1301, 1303-06

(1985). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART,

DISMISSED IN PART

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.