Opinion

Sadler, C. v. WCAB, of: Phila. Coca-Cola Co.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jan 28, 2020
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

CARL SADLER : No. 413 EAL 2019

:

:

v. : Petition for Allowance of Appeal

: from the Order of the

: Commonwealth Court

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL :

BOARD :

:

:

PETITION OF: PHILADELPHIA COCA- :

COLA COMPANY :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:

(1) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in reversing the appeal

board’s affirmance of the WCJ’s grant of [Petitioner’s] suspension

petition for a 75 week period which allowed [Petitioner] to assert a

credit against [Respondent’s] future compensation for money paid to

[Respondent] during his incarceration as the grant of a suspension

was consistent with the Act and the applicable case law?

(2) Whether the Commonwealth Court’s interpretation that [Petitioner] is

precluded from suspending benefits under the circumstances of this

case, creates an unequal application of the law for similarly situated

claimants, and similarly-situated employers in violation of the Equal

Protection guarantees of the Constitutions of the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania and the United States of America?

Petitioner’s Application for Supersedeas is DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.