The opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the
internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-2872-17T4
ERIKA LEVIN,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF REVIEW,
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and
CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP
BOARD OF EDUCATION T/A
CHERRY HILL HIGH SCHOOL
EAST,
Respondents-Respondents.
Submitted December 17, 2018 – Decided January 4, 2019
Before Judges Gooden Brown and Rose.
On appeal from the Board of Review, Department of
Labor, Docket No. 107,654.
Erika Levin, appellant pro se.
Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General, attorney for
respondent Board of Review (Melissa H. Raksa,
Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Jessica M.
Saxon, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).
Respondent Cherry Hill Township Board of Education
T/A Cherry Hill High School East has not filed a brief.
PER CURIAM
Claimant Erika Levin appeals from a February 23, 2018 final decision of
the Board of Review (Board) denying her claim for unemployment benefits from
her employer, Cherry Hill Township Board of Education t/a Cherry Hill High
School East (Cherry Hill) 1 because she left work "without good cause
attributable to such work." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a).
Pertinent to this appeal, the Board determined Cherry Hill had filed a
timely appeal. Before us, the Board acknowledges Cherry Hill's appeal was
untimely and, accordingly, seeks a remand to reexamine its determination. In
its brief, the Board represents claimant consented to that request. 2 Claimant
does not contend otherwise. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to reconsider
the timeliness of Cherry Hill's appeal from the Appeal Tribunal's decision
awarding claimant benefits, and her eligibility for such benefits.
1
Cherry Hill did not file a responding brief on appeal.
2
According to the Board, claimant consented to a remand during a telephone
conversation on August 17, 2018.
A-2872-17T4
2
Vacated and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this
opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction.
A-2872-17T4
3