The opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
444444444444
NO. 17-1048
444444444444
OSCAR ORTIZ, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE FARM LLOYDS, RESPONDENT
4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT, joined by JUSTICE BROWN and JUSTICE BLACKLOCK, concurring in
part and dissenting in part.
I join Parts I, II, III-A, III-B, and III-C of the Court’s opinion. For the reasons I explain today
in dissent from the Court’s opinion in Barbara Technologies Corp. v. State Farm Lloyds,1 I dissent
from Part III-D and from the Court’s judgment insofar as it does not affirm the court of appeals’
judgment in full.
Nathan L. Hecht
Chief Justice
Opinion delivered: June 28, 2019
1
___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. 2019).