“Petitioner cannot evade the time requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(c) by filing successive motions addressed to the same issue.”
How later courts described this case
- “Petitioner cannot evade the time requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(c) by filing successive motions addressed to the same issue.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D19-0217
_____________________________
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF FLORIDA
A & M UNIVERSITY, a public
body corporate,
Petitioner,
v.
ANN L. WEAD KIMBROUGH,
Respondent.
_____________________________
Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.
April 29, 2019
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Bensonhurst Drywall, Inc. v. Ledesma, 583 So.
2d 1094 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (“Petitioner cannot evade the time
requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(c) by
filing successive motions addressed to the same issue.”)
LEWIS, WETHERELL, and JAY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Maria A. Santoro of Dennis Jackson Martin & Fontela, P.A.,
Tallahassee, for Petitioner.
Marie A. Mattox of Marie A. Mattox, P.A., Tallahassee, for
Respondent.
2