Opinion

Iuzhakov v. Flatcher

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Jan 31, 2019
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

ALEKSANDR IUZHAKOV, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-02034 (KBJ)

)

JOHN FLATCHER, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 13, 2018, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, or in the alternative,

for summary judgment (see Mot., ECF No. 9.) The Court advised the pro se plaintiff of his

obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to

respond to the motion, and specifically warned him that if he did not respond to motion by

October 31, 2018, the Court may treat the motion as conceded. (See ECF No. 10.) To date,

Plaintiff has neither filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion nor has he requested

additional time to do so. Therefore, the Court will GRANT Defendants’ motion to dismiss

as conceded and DISMISS Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice. Defendants’ alternative

request for summary judgment will DENIED as moot.

A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

DATE: January 31, 2019 Ketanji Brown Jackson

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.