Opinion

Hooks v. State

  • 2013 Ark. App. 500
Court
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Filed
Sep 18, 2013
Status
Published
On the bench
Brandon J. Harrison
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 64.1%

The opinion

Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 500

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

Susan Williams

2019.01.02 DIVISION III

No.CR-12-900

15:21:47 -06'00'

Opinion Delivered September 18, 2013

PAMELA HOOKS

APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIRST

V. DIVISION

[NO. CR-2010-4212]

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE HONORABLE LEON JOHNSON,

JUDGE

REBRIEFING ORDERED

BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge

A Pulaski County jury found Pamela Hooks guilty of second-degree murder. Ark.

Code Ann. § 5-10-103 (Repl. 2006). She was then sentenced to 720 months’

imprisonment. Hooks argues on appeal that the circuit court erred in denying her motion

for a directed verdict because the State failed to sufficiently prove its case against her. We

cannot decide the merits of Hooks’s appeal at this point because she has failed to abstract

material parts of the trial testimony.

Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(5) (2013) provides:

(5) Abstract. The appellant shall create an abstract of the material parts of all

the transcripts (stenographically reported material) in the record.

Information in a transcript is material if the information is essential for the

appellate court to confirm its jurisdiction, to understand the case, and to

decide the issues on appeal.

1

Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 500

In her brief, Hooks challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support her conviction

(on the element that she intended John Davis’s death), but her abstract omits her own trial

testimony. Hooks’s trial testimony is essential to understand the issues and decide this

case’s merits. Spears v. State, 82 Ark. App. 376, 109 S.W.3d 139 (2003). We therefore

direct Hooks to correct this deficiency by filing a substituted brief within fifteen days of

this order’s date. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3) (2013). After service of her substituted brief,

the State may file a responsive brief in the time prescribed by the supreme court clerk, or

it may choose to rely on the appellee’s brief it previously filed. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3).

We encourage Hooks’s counsel to review our rules and her current abstract and

addendum to ensure that no additional deficiencies are present.

Rebriefing ordered.

BROWN and WHITEAKER, JJ., agree.

James Phillips and Elizabeth Borders, Deputy Public Defenders, by: Clint Miller,

Deputy Public Defender, for appellant.

Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Vada Berger, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.