Opinion

Khoshmood v. Nicholas

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Apr 24, 2018
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Emmet G. Sullivan
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 4.4%

The opinion

UNITED sTATEs DISTRICT CoURT

FoR THE DISTRICT oF CoLUMBIA APR 2 ft 2018

Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy

Gourts for the Dlstrict ot Co\umt)la

)

MOHSEN KHOSHMOOD, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 18-0504 (UNA)

)

LAUCKLAND A. NICHOLAS, )

)

Defendant. )

)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court has reviewed plaintiff s complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by

pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted

by lawyers See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however,

must comply With the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz`sch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239

(D.D.C. l987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint

contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon Which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a

short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand

for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum

standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to

prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine Whether the

doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977).

The plaintiff appears to bring this action against the attorney who represented him in a

criminal matter. The complaint discusses legal ethics and the protections offered under the

Fourth and Eighth Amendments to the United States Constitution, but does not articulate a legal

claim against the defendant As drafted, however, the complaint fails to comply with Rule 8(a).

lt fails to set forth a basis for this Court’s jurisdiction or any factual allegations showing that the

plaintiff is entitled to relief.

The Court will grant plaintiff’ s application to procee ' uperz`s, and will dismiss

the complaint and this civil action without Per ud¢/rder consis nt with this

Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

DATE: or ,

/ §// 3 United States District ridge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.