Opinion

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court
United States Court of Federal Claims
Filed
Apr 9, 2018
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Nora Beth Dorsey
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17-0303V

Filed: January 17, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

LORA BELLE BROWN,

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Petitioner, Damages Decision Based on Proffer;

v. Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Administration (SIRVA)

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for

petitioner.

Lara Ann Englund, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On March 3, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine

Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of a Prevnar 13 pneumococcal conjugate vaccine

administered to her on September 3, 2015. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the

Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters

On October 2, 2017, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled

to compensation for her SIRVA. On January 16, 2018, respondent filed a proffer on

award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $97,500.00.

Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa (2012).

proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner

is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards

petitioner a lump sum payment of $97,500.00 in the form of a check payable to

petitioner, Lora Belle Brown. This amount represents compensation for all damages

that would be available under § 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this

decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

LORA BELLE BROWN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) No. 17-303V

) Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey

SECRETARY OF )

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, )

)

Respondent. )

)

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On October 2, 2017, respondent filed a Vaccine Rule 4(c) report concluding that

petitioner suffered an injury that is compensable under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury

Act of 1986, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§300aa-10 to -34. Accordingly, on October 2, 2017, the

Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement.

I. Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items

Respondent proffers that, based on the evidence of record, petitioner should be awarded

$97,500.00. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be

entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made as a

lump sum payment of $97,500.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 1 Petitioner is a

competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. This amount accounts

1

Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, respondent would oppose any award for future

medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering, and the parties reserve the

right to move the Court for appropriate relief.

for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner would be

entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

CHAD A. READLER

Acting Assistant Attorney General

C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO

Acting Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division

CATHARINE E. REEVES

Deputy Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division

ALEXIS B. BABCOCK

Assistant Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division

s/ LARA A. ENGLUND

LARA A. ENGLUND

Trial Attorney

Torts Branch, Civil Division

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station

Washington D.C. 20044-0146

Tel: (202) 307-3013

E-mail: lara.a.englund@usdoj.gov

Dated: January 16, 2018

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.