Opinion

Fletcher v. Sprool

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Dec 4, 2017
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Rudolph Contreras
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 4.1%

The opinion

mm~mmm.wm.»..¢m » . v. 1 4,. . <\ ,M.W... w ~Ww

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED

DEBORAH D. FLETCHER )

) mm uDEC 4 2017

Plaintiff, ) Cou -S. Dlstrlct

mw &Bankru

) the Dlstrlct of co,u:'tb'a

v. ) Civil Action No. 17-2283 (UNA)

)

EDIE SPROOL, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the Court upon review of plaintiffs application for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The application Will be granted but the

complaint Will be dismissed

The Court has reviewed plaintiff s complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by

pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted

by lawyers See Haines v. Kerner, 4()4 U.S. 5l9, 520 (l972). Even pro se litigants, however,

must comply With the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 23 7, 239

(D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint

contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon Which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a

short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand

for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. S(a). The purpose of the minimum

standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claims being asserted, sufficient

to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine Whether the

doctrine of res judicata applies Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

*~…¢M~H .. ., . . m \.. … ~, »» , _ W-<M~`,w M,…¢./ ,

Plaintiff purportedly brings “Assault, Libet [sic] & Slander” claims. Compl. at l.

Missing from the complaint, which appears to be grounded in tort law, are factual allegations

showing plaintiffs entitlement to relief and a statement regarding this Court’s federal

jurisdiction As drafted, plaintiff’ s complaint does not meet the minimal pleading requirements

set forth in Rule S(a). The Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice.

An Order is issued separately.

/W/H?

United Sv¢[ltes District Judge

DATE: November 30 , 2017

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.