Opinion

LARRY PRICE VS. BHADO AND BHADO DEVELOPMENT, LLC(L-3854-15, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

Court
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Filed
Jul 11, 2017
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court."

Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the

parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-2504-15T2

LARRY PRICE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BHADO and BHADO DEVELOPMENT, LLC

and UNION CITY ZONING BOARD OF

ADJUSTMENT,

Defendants-Respondents.

________________________________

Argued June 6, 2017 — Decided July 11, 2017

Before Judges Koblitz and Sumners.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey,

Law Division, Hudson County, Docket No. L-

3854-15.

Larry Price, appellant, argued the cause pro

se.

Gregory F. Kotchick argued the cause for

respondent Union City Zoning Board of

Adjustment (Durkin and Durkin LLP, attorneys;

Mr. Kotchick, of counsel and on the brief).

Alonso and Navarrete, LLC, attorneys for

respondent Bhado and Bhado Development, LLC,

join in the brief of respondent Union City

Zoning Board of Adjustment.

PER CURIAM

The parties to the appeal have settled the issues between

them. In accordance with their consent order of dismissal, the

appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

2 A-2504-15T2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.