Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1939
Status
Published
On the bench
Gerald Mann
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 3.6%

The opinion

_ -._ ._

Honorable A. E. Hickerson

County Auditor, Montgomery County

Conroe, Texas

Dear Mr. Hickerson;

Opinion No. O-926

Re: Whether or not the County

Rospi,talBoard of Managers

is authorized to issue and

sell monthly hospitalisa-

tion service policies.

With further reference to your letter of June 2,

kindly be advised that your request f~oran opinion as con-

tained therein has received the attention of this depart-

ment. The questions asked by you are as follows:

Vi. Would the enclosed agreement if put

in effect by the Montgomery County Hospital

(I will say, which is owned and operated by

Montgomery County) and sold only to residents

of Montgomery County, comply with any statute

which may exist.

"2. If so, is there any statute covering

the amount of expense which the Montgomery

County Hospital may expend in selling these

agreements and overhead in general caused the

hospital by virtue of inaugurating the plan.

"3. Based upon information by hospitals

using;such plan, we understand that it Is not

necessary to secure a charter, that so long as

Montgomery County Hospital issues the agreement

only to citizens of Montgomery County, that this

is all that is necessary. Is this correct?"

Hon. A. E. Hickerson, page 2 o-926

We observe from your letter that the Mont-

gomery County Hospital is owned and operated exclusively

hy Montgomery County, and we necessarily presume that

s'amewas constructed and established under the rovi-

sions of Chapter 5, Title 71, Articles 4478 to c4 98 in-

clusive, Revised Civil Statutes of 1925 and amendments

thereto.

Anticle 44.78provides:

"The commissioners count of any county

shall-have power to establish a county hospital

and to enlarge any existing hospitals for the

care and treatment of persons suffering from any

illness, disease or injury, subject to-the pro-.

visions of this chapter. At intervals of not'

less than twelv.8 .months. ten uer cent of the

quald$*d -.-tax ~aying'voters of a county

may petit.ionsuch court to provide for the es-

tablishing or enlarging of a county hospital, in

which event said court within the time designated

in such petition shall submit to such voters at a

special or regular election the proposition of

issuing bonds in such aggregate amount as may be

designated in said petition for the establishdng

or enlarging of such hospital. Whenever any such

proposition shall rece1ve.a majority of the votes of

the qualified property taxpayers voting at such

election, said commissioners court shall establish

and maintain such hospital and shall have the

following powers:

"1. To purchase and lease real property

therefor, or acquire such real property, and

easement6 therein, by condemnation proceedings.

"2. To purchase or srect all necessary

buildings, make all necessary improvements and

repairs and alter any existing buildings, for

the use of said hospital, The plans for such

erection, alteration, or repair shall first be

approved by the State *ealth Officer, if his ap-

proval is requested by the said commissioners

court.

“3. To cause to be assessed, levied and

collected, such taxes upon the real and personal

property owned in the county as it shall deem

Hon. A. E.B&ckerson, Page 3 o-926

necess&ry to provide the funds for the main-

tenance thereof, and for all other necessary

expenditures therefor.

“4. To ;issue county bonds to provide

funds-for the establishing, enlarging and ~_

equipping of said hospital and for all other

necessary permanent improvements in connection'

therewith; to do all other things that may be

required by law in order to render said bond3

valid.

"5. To appoint a board of managers for said

hospital.

"6. To accept and hold in trust for the

county, any grant or devise of land, or any

gift or bequest of money or other personal pro-

perty or any donation to,be applied, principal

or income or both, for the benefit of said

hospital, and apply the ssme in accordancs with

the terms of the gift. (Acts 1913, p. 711."

Article 4479, as amended by the Acts of the 40th

Legislature 1927, pertaining to the board of managers for

said hospital, provides that the term of office for 8Wh

member of said Board shall be two years, except that in

making the first appointments after this Act takes effect

three members shall be appointed for one year and three

m8mberS for two years 30 that thereafter three members

of said board till be appointed every two years. The

managers shall receive no compensation for their services

but the Act provides that they shall be allowed their

actual and necessary traveling and other expenses within

this state to be audited and paid by the commissioners

court in the same manner as other expenses of the hospital.

This Article further provides that any manager after being

cited may at any time for cause be removed from office

by said court.

Article l&80, pertaining to the powers of the

Board of Managers, provides in part that the Board shall

have the general management end control of the said

hospital, grounds, buildings, officers and anployees

thereof; of the inmates therein and of all matters rel ting

to the government, discipline, contracts and fiscal coe -

terns thereof; and make such r~11es and regulations asmay

. .

Hon. Aa E. Hickerson, page 4 o-926

seem to them necessary for carrying out the purposes

of such hospital.

Your attention is further.called to .the other

pnovisions of Chapter 3 pertaining to the admission of

patients, and that no discrimination shall be made in the

accommodations, care or treatment of any patients because

of the fact that the patient or his relatives contribute

to the cost of his maintenance, in whole or in part, and

that where a patient is able to pay for his maintenance

the hospital shall not charge any greater sum than the aver-

age per capita cost of maintaining such patlent including

a reasonable allowance for the interest on the cost of the

hospital.

The above statutes are called to your attention

for the purpose of showing the Legislature has treated the

subject of erecting, establishing, operating and maintain-

ing such hospital with considerable detail.

The commissd,onerscourt is given the authority

to acquire real property for such purpose; to erect all ne-

cessary buildings, and to levy and collect taxes for the

maintenance thereof. We do not construe such contracts

as-authorized to be made'by the county board of managers

as granting to said board any greater power or authority

,tomake and enter into contract for the maintenance of

said hospital than would be authorized to be made by the

commissioners court in the absence of a board of managerL.

We deem it unnecessary to go into the provisions of the

policy form aspresented~along with your request in view

of the authorities hereinafter cited.

"'The commissioners court is a creature of

the state constitution and its powers are limited

and controlled by the constitution end the laws

as passed by the legislaturel. Article 5, Section

18 of the Constitution of Texas; Baldwin v. Travis

County, 40 Tex. Civ. App. 199, 88 SW 480; Seward

V. Falls County (Tex. Civ. App. ) 2 6 SW 728;

Bland v. Orr, 90 Tex. 492, 39 SW 55!bI(--

Commissioners Court v. Wallace, 15 9. W. (2d) 535.

Hon. A. E. E:ckerson, page 5 O-926

It is a well settled principle of law that the

commissioners court does not have any authority except

that which is expressly or impliedly -conferredupon it

by law. Edwards County v. Jennings, 33 S W 385; 15 Cor.

Jur. 457, Sec. 103; 15 Car.-Jur. p. 537, Sec. 221.

"Where a power is granted and the method

of its exeroise is prescribed, the prescribed

method excludes all others, and must be follow-

ed." Lewis' Sutherland Statutory Construction,

Vol. 2, par. 572, 527, 828, 631.,

We quote from 15 Corpus Juris p. 537 as follows:

"In ac&ordance with .the ,generalrule here-

tofore stated, that county boards or county

courts have.knopowers other than those conferred

expressly or by necessary implication, such courts

or boards have no power to rent or lease property

or franchises owned bythe county, in the ab-

sence of statutory authority so to d."

We quote from the case of Edwards County v. Jennings,

33 SW p. 585, as follows:

"Counties are political or civil divisions

of the state, created for the purpo~seof bring-

ing government home to the people and supplying

the necessary means for executing the wishes~bf

the people, end bringing'into exercisesthe ma-

chinery necessary to the enforcement of local

government. Counties, being component parts of

the state, have no powers or duties except those

clearly set forth and defined in the constitution

and statutes. 1 Dill. Mun. Corp. (par. 25). The

statutes of Texas have clearly defined the powers,

prescribed the duties, and imposed the liabilities

of the commissioners court, the ~medium through.

which the different counties act, and from those

statutes must oome all the authority vested in

the counties. It is provided in the constitution

that the county commissioners so chosen, with the

county judge, as presiding officer, shall compose

the county commissioners court, which shall exer-

cise such powers and jurisdictions over all county

Hon. b. E. Kickerson, page.6 o-926

buslneaep as is conferred by this constitution

and the laws of this state, or as m&y be here-,

after prescribed. Constitution, Article 5, par.

8, sec. 18. Looking to the powers granted by

the Legislature by virtue of the above cohstitu-

tional provisions, we find that no authority is

given the commissioners court to enter into such

contract8 as the one sued on in this case. Revised

Statutes, Art. 1514. It is clear that the attempted

contract was beyong the power and authority donfided

in the county commissioners."

We find that in 1927 Honorable H. Grady Chandler,

Assistant Attorney General of Texas, wrote a conference opin-

ion rendered to Era E. P.!Watts, then County Auditor, of

Wichita County, Wichita Falls, T&as, in which this depart-

ment held that the commissioners court of Wichita County

did not have authority to lease the county hospital. This

ruling, we think, lends support to our view that such

authority, expressed or implied, for raising tinds for main-

taining a county hospital by means of selling policies of

insurance is not round in the laws of tMs state.

In view of the above authorities, you are, there-

fore, respectfully advised thatit as the opinion of this

epartment that the.~l~ontgomery

County Hospital Board of

iisnagers doesnot hav,eauthority to sell policies of lnsur-

ante for hospital service under a membership plan as a meens

of financing the county hospital affairs.

Our answer to your question No. 1 renders it un-

necessary for us to answer questions two and three of your

letter.

Yours very truly

ATTORNEY GEEERAL OF TEXAS

BY Wm. J. R. Ring

Assistant

WmlCrBT--pam

APPROVED JUL lh 1939

W. F. MOORE

FIRST ASSISTANT

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

APPROVED OPINION COMMITTEE

BY WRK, CHAIREAR

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.