Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1941
Status
Published
On the bench
Gerald Mann
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 3.6%

The opinion

26

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

AUSTIN

Honorable C. 8. Clark, Chainan

Stat0 Board of hglrmere

‘n’atsr

Auurtin,Tsxar

Dear Sir! opinion lo. O-3606

other thau

arts or rtatr

rs under the

Annotated

wollr, othm thau

annual reporta with

ooverlug the iuf6flu-

6, y.A.Q.B., unbr a

ed by tie Board pw-

u aaib Board uudar the

7 6 Vemoa’r Annotated C%Vi%Btatuter

rradm asJ?ii$$”

d-G616. iWailed strrtdmmt frrmlclbad

*OR or batore the ilrrt iluy of -oh of eaoh

every person, asroolat,fion o? pereons

27

flonorableC. S. Clark. Chairman, Page e

during any part of the preoedlng oalendar year,

owed or operated any arterlan well for any pur-

pore other than that of domsstlo us., shall fur-

nish, under oath, to the Board oi Hater Englneercl,

upon blanks to be furnl4hed by the Board, a da-

tailed rtateaaat showLn$ the qumatlty of water whlsh

ha. been derived from s\loh~411, and th. 0haraat.r

of use to whloh same has been applied together

with the change in level of water tabi. of aal6

rell, and if used tn Irrigation,the acreage and

yield of eaoh orop, together with suoh additional

data as the Board may reqolre.*

WI are of the oplnlon that your first quertlon

should be lnewered ln the negative. By Its express term.

thle article appllrs only to the owner or operator of an

arterlan well. It oan be given no other Interpretation.

Ye quote from 39 tex. Jut. 186-189 an follows:

Vhe maxle

(the expression

14 raid to be a loglail, senalbl. and 60-d rule of

ooartruetlon;and it ha4 been frlrquently applied

in the oonstraotlonof statute8 as 91411a. In the

lnteroretatlonof oth4r doaumentr. The maxlr rlgnl-

the e x p r erlentloa

Sler th a t 4 or emaeration of one

peroon, thing, oonsequenoeor olarr Is tantamount

to an express lxolurlon of all othrr4. And when It

la appll4abl.,afflrmatlreword0 Imply a negative

a? what Is not afflrms4, negative words lqlr an

affIrmatlreof what is not negatlred; and a pm~l-

rlon llmltlng a thing to be done In a partlaular

form or manner lnpllee that it mh4ll not be done

oth.rwls4.a

In answer to your flrrt qu48tlon. you are rerpeot-

fully adtired that owners of water wells other than artesian

wells are not requlrmd by Artisle ‘7616, Vetaon’r Annotated

Civil Statutes, to file annual reports or rtat4mentswith

the Board of Water Engineers.

.

28

Honorable C. 9. Clark, Chairman, Page S

Aatm 1931, 42nd Legislature.Chapter 261, Sea-

tlons 1 and 6 (codlfledas Artlola 646a, Vernon*8 Penal

Code), read as follows:

*9.0. 1. It is hereby dealared to be the

policy and duty of the Taxa State Roard of Mater

Engineer8 to make and enforoe ntlee and regula-

tion‘ for the aon(1enatlon,protection,prerar-

ration and distributionof all underground, rub-

terrmean aud peroolatlngwater8 of every kind

an& nature whateoerer situated within the limits

of the Stats of Texas.

a +l l

*Sea . 6. The Board of Uater lihglneerr8hall

do all things neoessary for the aonsamatlon, pro-

tection, preernatlon and dtrtrIbutlon of under-

ground, subterraneanand peroolatlngwaters In

this State and rhall make and euforoe appropriate

mleo and regulation8thsrefor and the speolflo

enumerationof rpeoial powerr and but148 herein

8hall not be OonetNod to deny the raid Board

other powers and duties n8oessary to the aarwlng

out of the purposes of this Aot as 8xpreeoed ln

Sootlana 1 and 6 hereof. Failure for a p4riod

of aore than thirty days to omrply vith any order

of raid board Issued ln pursuanoe of the power8

and dutler herein oreated ohall 8ubjeat the par-

8on eo riolatlng said order to the penaltier enu-

g&ted in Seotlon 6 haTeof. (Aah 1931, 42nd

-, p. 432, oh. 261.)

Thus, It Is seen that alnas 1931, It tin 0xpraealJ

bean the pollay and dutl of the State through the Boaxd of

Water Engineers to promulgate Nle8 and regulation8ior the

laon8ervatlon,protaotion, preservation and dlstrlbutlonof

,~subterraneanaad peroolatlngwaters of m

(EIppha8Is ourr) That thin etatute 18

'there aan be no doibt.

We quote from 44 Tex. Jur. 25 as follows:

*In the absence of anjy aldenae to the oon-

trary, It may be presumed that water obtained by

29

Baaomble C.~ 8. Clark, Chairman, Pqe 4

exoavatlng the earth Is ordinarily peroolatlng

water."

The oamc of liourton& T.C.F.y.Co.

t. East, W Tern.

147, fX%9-W. 279, ertabllrheothe aostmonlaw rule of thr

right of oaptum am to undergroundraters In thlt state.

Under thle niLe even though a well drains all the water from

another well on adjaasnt property, the owner of the moon6

well hm@ no re0oTery; it Is "damnum lbrqus 1nJurIa.a See

also Judklmre1. Miller, 960 S.V. 690; Terns Co. T. (Plddlngr,

148 S.W. 1149.

Is the right of aapturr of undergrounduaterm rub

Jeot to rcaronableregulation by the State when In the Interest

of ooncervatlon,preservation,etc., apoh regulation Ir neaeg-

sarr? Ye am of the oplalon that It Is.

A olear analogr to the regulationo? rlghhtoin under-

ground waters la found In the regulation of rlghte In oil and

gas. The rule of oapture 10 equally applloable to 011 and

gas flowing beneath the eurfaoe. Olllette T. Wltehell et al,

214 6.x. 619; Prairie 011 & Gas Co. at al T. X16-Kaaeatl Oil

& Gas Co., I?64B.U. 260; Texas PaCllle Coal b 011 Co. T.

Comanahe Duke 011 Co., 2?4 6.U. 193, 296 6.W. 664. P*terson

at al T. OnTee 011 Co. et al, ~87S.V. (2dQ)S67 66 S.Y. (86)

781; Brown et al (1. Humble 011 0 Refining Co., is6S.W. (6d)

966* General Wade Oil Co. 6% al T. Iiarrlret ux 101 S.Y.

(24 109dT Thespaon et al v. Coa8olId8ted6as Otilltiea Cor-

poration, Jo0 U.S. 66, 81 L.Ed. 610. It Is settled br the

drolrlons of the oourlof Texas that the right of oapture,

aa applied to oil and ga8, 18 eubbjeotto reasonable reg&UtIon.

Ue quote from the aaee of Paterson et al T. Grayoe

Oil Co. et xl, 67 S.Y. 6d 667 (Af?Ined 98 6.W. Bd 761) as

follow‘:

a * * l

*Won though It aould be eald that prior to

the adoption of the statater resting in the Railroad

Commlrslon the powers therein enumeratedand the

adoption of Rule 40 bg the eommlselon,the oommoa-

law rule am announoed In flouston& T.C.Ry.Go. 1.

honorable C. 9. Clark, Chairun, Page 5

East, 98 Tex. 140, 81 S.W. 279, 66 L.R.A. 738, 107

Am. St. Rep. 620, 4 Ann. Cae. 827, would be appll-

Gable to the production of oil by a leaseholderto

the same extent as the produotlon of vater from a

well drilled which would exhaust the eupply OS an

adJoinIng property owner, yet we believe that th

lnaotment of those statutse and the adoption of

Rule 40 by the RaIlroad Co~mlrelonwould hare the

effeot to ohange that oommon-lawrule aa applloable

to the proauatlon of 011 and gae anb that the same

are valid, In that thelr &feet la mwoly to pro-

trot the right of blfferent lease or tltls holderr

in the enJovment OS thelr ooequal rights to aoquln

oil from a common reaenolr.

The Suprere.Courtin the oaae of Brows et al '1.

Humble 011 L Refln¶.w Oo., 83 S.W. (26) 938, had the Sollow-

lag tfauyr

*Owlag to the peoullar oharao~terlrtioe of oil

and gas, the foregoing rule of ownership of 011 an6

pslln plaoe rhould be oonslderebIn oonneotlonwith

the law of aaptlrre. This rule gives the rlght ts

produoe all of the oil and gas that ~111 flov out

of the veil on one'8 land; and this lr a propcrrtJ

right . And It ir limited only b7 the phJmlaal poe-

rlbi2itr of the abjolnlag landowner dlmlnlshlngthe

oil and gas under one's land br the exerolre of the

same right of oapture, The following deoleione dlr-

OUBB the lau of aapture aa applied in this state:

StephennsCounty v. #Id-Kansas 011 & (PaaGo., 113 Tax.

160, 254 S.Y. 2Q0, 29 A.L.R. 668; If.&T.C.Ry.Co. 1.

Eart, 98 Tax. 146, 81 S.Y. 279, 66 L.&A. 738, 107

Am. St. Rep. 620, 4 AM. Car. 827; Pralrir 011 & Qar

Co. Y. Stats (T'er. Corn. App.) 2Sl S.U. 1088, 1089.

Both ruler are subjsot to remlrtlon under the oollaq

power of a state. (!Smphasir ours)

lib. c*

-.

::a

Honorable C. 9. Clark, Chairman, Page 6

You will notloe that among the authorltlee cited

by the court appears the Fast aase whlah 18 the prlnolpal

case defining v&tar rights In thle State In thin conneotlon.

Upon the bnhlo of the authorltles heretofore olted,

It ie the opinion of this department that the Ttate nay lm-

pose reauonable regulations for the prerervatlon and conser-

vation of underground, subterranean, and peroolatlng water8

within this State.

In anewer to your uecond question, therefore, you

are respectfully advl*e& that under Aote 1931, 42nd Leglnla-

ture, Chapter 261, the Soar& of Water Engineers rnw raqulre

of ovnercr of uater vella, other than artesian, annual reports

covering the same information requlre4 by Article 7615, V.A.C.S.,

of owner8 of arteelan wells, If In the exercise of sound dis-

oretlon the Board deteralnee that nuch report6 are ensentlal

for the *aonservatlon, protection, precervatlon an8 bie-

trlbutlon* of the underground, eubterranean, and percolating

watsre of this State.

Very truly your8

ATTORNEYG!ZXER4LOF TEXAS

Jamer P. Hart

Assletant

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.