Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1941
Status
Published
On the bench
Gerald Mann
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Hon. T. M, Trimble Opinion No* O-3453

First Assistant Re: Method of signing vouchers

State Superintendentof adopted by Poteet Independ-

Public Instruction ent School District.

Austin, Texas

Dear Sir:

In your letter of April 23, 1941, you advised us

of the following facts:

“The Board of Trustees of the Poteet Independ-

ent School District were duly organized following

the trustee electionsthe first Saturday in April

according to the Public School Laws of Texas.

“The minutes and order of the Board reveal the

following proceedings:

“‘The Board proceeded to reorganize for the

following year. R. S, Guynes was elected president

of the Board; J, H. Mangum was elected vice presi-

dent; Joe V. Davidson was elected secretary;M. D.

Stroble was elected financial secretary of the Board

and was authorizedto make purchases,keep records

of accounts, countersignvouchers drawn by the presi-

dent upon order of the Board, and to perform any

duties as directed by the Board.’

“R. S, Guynes is a member of the Board, Joe

V, Davidson is a member of the Board, and M. D.

Stroble is not a member of the Board.

I’M, D. Stroble has performed such duties for

the Board of Trustees as outlined in order of his

election and employmentby the Board, Joe V. David-

son who is a membar of the Board has performed such

perhunctory duties as signing minutes of the proceed-

ings of the Board, orders for election, teachers

contracts,etc.”

And you request our opinion in responce to these two questions:

. - i-

-

Hon. T. M. Trimble, page 2 (O-3453)

"Does the above organizationcomply with

the law?"

"Is the fact that Joe V. Davidson signs per-

functory papers and records as secretaryand M.D.

Stroble signs vouchers when duly drawn by the

president upon order of the Board of Trustees, a

violation of the law?"

The Poteet IndependentSchool District was created

by Special Act of the Legislature in 1913. H.B. No. 523, Ch,

23, p. 80 Special Laws 33rd Legislature,Regular Session.

By House k.11 No. 508, &h. 60, p.,223, Special Laws, 38th Leg-

islature,Regular Session, Sec. 3 of the Act creating said

district was amended so as to read as follows:

"The management and control of the public

free schools within said district is hereby vested

in a board of trustees, which board shall be com-

posed of seven persons to be elected in accordance

with Chapter 18, Title 48 Revised Civil Statutes

of Texas, which said boarb of trustees shall main-

tain and control the public free schoolswithin

said district to the exclusion of every other au-

thority except in so far as the State Superintend-

ent of Public Instructionand the State Board of

Education may be vested by law with supervisory

authority to instruct said board."

Chapter 18, Title 48 Revised Civil Statutes of Texas,

at the time of the enactment oh said House Bill 508 in 1923

embraced what is now Articles 2774 to 2783 Revised Civil &at-

utes of 192 (but it will be noted not in&ding Articles 2774a,

2777a, 27772 and 2783a, Vernon's AnnotatedCivil Statutes).

Article 2832, Revised Civil Statutes, authorizes the

district to select its own depository, as it contains more than

150 scholastics.

The quoted provision from House Bill 508, 38th Legis-

lature is broad enough to sustain the action of the Board of

Trustees in appointing as financial secretary one who is not

a member of the Board. If Article 2779 is applicable,a point

which we do not deem it necessary to decide it does not forbid

such appointment. In our Opinion Ho. O-211& we held that the

Board of Trustees of an independentschool district created un-

der general laws is authorizedby Article 2779 to appoint was

secretary a person who is not a member of the Board of Trustees.

Hence we conclude that Mr. Stroble'snot being a trustee is not

a material factor.

Hon. 11,Me Trimble, page 3 (0-3453)

Since the,Board of Trustees is the governing author-

ity of the district disbursementsof the district'sfunds may

be made only by the Board or under its direction or order.

No statute undertakes to set out just how such authority must

be manifest or just what procedure must be followed in making

withdrawals or disbursementsof money from the depository.The

Board must act as such and its action should be made to appear

in the official minutes. The depository is entitled to be sat-

isfied of Board action and authority before honoring a voucher

and it goes without saying that it is best for all parties con-

cerned that the depository should not release funds unless it

be made to appear clearly that the Board of Trustees has author-

ized the same. However there is nothing in our laws which for-

bids the procedurewhich has been adopted end we:therefore an-

swer your first question in the affirmativeand the second in

the negative,

Yours very truly

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF T&AS

By /s/ Glenn R. Lewis

Glenn R. Lewis, Assistant

APPROVEB MAY 7 1941

/s/ Grover SalII

ers

FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL

APPROVED8OPINION COMMITTEE

BY: BWB, CHAIRMAN

GRL:db:wb

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.