Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1941
Status
Published
On the bench
Gerald Mann
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Honorable Melvin Combs

County Attorney

Jefferson County

Beaumont, Texas

Dear Sir: Opinion NO, 0-3860

Re: Authority of fresh water supply

distrLct, created undeFArt. XVI;

See, 59, Constitution, and Ch. 4,

Title 128, R.C.S., to incur ln-

debtedness,

We have your letter of August 7, submitting for our

opinion eight questIons that will be taken up in the order in

which .theyare propounded:

First --

"Can a fresh water supply district, created

und.erArticles1.6, Sec. 59 of the Constitution

ant3Chapter 4, Title 128, R,C.S, of Texas, in-

cu:~"

indebtedness by first procuring authority to

do so by propel"election in the district?"

We refer you to Article 7922, Revised Civil Statutes,

which reads as follows:

"In the accomplishment of the proposes enumer-

ated in the fourth p??ecedingarticle, such dls-

trlcts may or may not issue bonds and may OP may

not incur indebtedness. No bonds by OP on behalf

of such distrfcts shall be issued nor shall any

indebtedness against the same be Incupped unless

the proposition to issue such bonds or to incur

such indebtedness shall be first submitted to the

qualified property taxpayfng voters of such dis-

trict, and the proposition adopted by a majority

vote at an election held to determine such ques-

t ion a"

We think the foregoing quoted article cleaply authorizes

the district to incur debt upon a vote of the people having the

qualifications there provided.

Honorable Melvin Combs, page #2 O-3860

Your second question is:

"If you have answered Question 1 in the

negative, then state in what manner a fresh

water,,nupplydistrict can create an indebted-

ness?

Inasmuch as Question Number 1 has been answered in the

affirmative, it is unnecessary to answer Question Number 2.

Question Number 3:

"Can a fresh water supply district Issue

revenue bonds to secure an indebtedness?"

It is well established law that polltical subdivisions

of the State have only such powers as are conferred by law or

such incidental powers as are necessary to carry out the ex-

press powers granted. We find no authority in Title 128 author-

lzing fresh water supply districts to issue bonds to be secured

by revenues obtained from the operation of the improvements con-

structed by such district. You are advised that in the absence

of an c?xpressauthority to issue such bonds the district d,oes

not have the right and, therefore, no revenue bonds can be is-

sued.

Your Question Number 4 is as follows:

'Bees such a fresh water supply district have

authority to create an indebtedness, duly author-

fzed by proper election, for the purposes set out

in Article 7918, and issue notes OP warrants evi-

de,ncingsame?"

Article 7918 reads as follows:

"All districts shall have full power and.

authority to build, construct, complete, carry

out, maintain, and in case of necessity, add

to and rebuild all works and improvements with-

in and without such district necessary to ac-

complish any plan of conservation, transporta-

tion and distribution of fresh water adopted for

or on behalf of such district, and may make all

necessary and proper contracts and employ all

persons and means necessary to that end; and such

districts are authorized, if the governing bodies

thereof shall deem it necessary, to take over In

whole or in part by purchase or otherwise any

water plants or systems within such districts".

Honorable Melvin Combs, page 83 0 -3860

It will be noted that this article confers both power

and authority upon such district to construct and otherwise

Improve f'acilitiesfor the purpose of accomplishing a plan of

conservation, transportation and distribution of fresh.water,

such as may have been adopted by such district, and states

expressly that it shall have the authority to make all neces-

sary and proper contracts and pursue any means necessary to

attain that end. Therefore, we are of the opinion that fol-

lowing the authorization to Incur an indebtedness, as provided

by Article 7922, that the district would have the authority to

issue notes or warrants for the purpose of evidencing such in-

debtedness.

Your Question Number 5 reads as follows:

"Can such a fresh water supply district dis-

charge its lawful indebtedness from the revenues

of the district derived from the sale of water,

after the operating expenses and upkeep of the

district have first been paid?"

In answer to this question we refer you to Article 7910

of the Revised Civil Statutes which expressly provides for the

use of excess funds. This article reads as follows:

"The Board shall prescribe the manner and

terms upon which water shall be furnished and

shall be authorized to fix the rate to be charg-

ed users of water from such district and shall

promulgate rules and regulations governing the

distribution and use of water; and shall apply

th.erevenue from the sale of such water to oper-

ating expenses and the upkeep of the system of

improvements installed in said district, and any

surplus that may be left after paying such ex-

penses shall be from year to year applied to the

paying ofinterest on the bonds or other indebt-

edness that may be incurred by the district and

if there be more than enough to pay operating and

upkeep expenses and the interest on the indebt-

edness of the district, then such surplus shall

be passed to the sinking fund."

We not only think that the district has the authority

to use the excess funds for such purpose but under the word-

ing of the above quoted,article, it appears mandatory that

such excess as may accrue shall be used in such manner.

Your Question Number 6 reads as follows:

Honorable Melvin Combs, page #4

“Can the net revenues (revenues remaining, if

any, after operating expenses and upkeep of the

district have first been paid) of such type of

district be pledged io secuzean indebtedness, duly

authorized and evidenced by a series of notes

or warrants, each note or warrant to be paid from

the current net revenues procured during the per-

iod of time for which said note or warrants was

given?"

It will be noted that no express authority has been con-

ferred to pledge such revenues to ,thepayment of indebtedness

that may be authorized under Article 7922, and, further, that

the language of the above quoted article clearly states that

only in the event a surplus exis'tsafter the payment of oper-

ating expenses and upkeep of the imprPovementsthat such funds

shall be used for the retirement of such indebtedness as may

have been incurred. Such pledge as the district might make

toward securing an indebtedness will, of course, be confined

to such funds as would accrue over and above the cost of oper-

ating and maintaining the distrfct; however, we see no inhibi-

tion in the statutes that would prevent the district under-

taking to secure Its indebtedness by a pledge of such surplus

If, as and when accumulated. It appears that the district has

the ge:neralpower necessary to manage its affairs in a manner

designed to accomplish the purposes for which the district was

established, and we think the distric'twould have the power to

arrange for the paying and securing of indebtedness in a man-

ner not Inconsistent with law, by authority of Article 7917,

which reads, in part, as follows:

"No enumeration of specific powers herein shall

be held a limitation upon the general powers con-

ferred by this chapter unless distinctly so expressed."

Your Question Number 7 reads as follows:

'Does a fpesh water supply district have author-

lty to borrow funds from the Federal Government,

or an agency thereof, fop t'hepurpose of construct-

lng a fresh water distribution system, and secuI"e

such loan in some manner other than by the issuance

of bonds (secured by taxes!?”

In out opinion the district would have the authority to

borrow funds from the Federal Government or any agency thepe-

of, to be evidenced by the issuance of notes or warrants which

may be secured by the levy of a tax authorized at the time the

proposition for?incurring the indebtedness is submitted to the

qualified property taxpaying voters of such district, pursuant

to the provisions of Article 7922.

- ..-.. .

Honorable Melvin Combs, page #5 0 -3860

Question Number 8 reads as follows:

"If you have answered Questlon 7 In the affirm-

ati,vethen state in detail how such loan can be

secured?"

We think the answer stated to Question Number 7 fully

answers.this question.

Trusting that the foregoing fully answers your Inquiry,

we are

Yours very truly

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

By s/Clarence E. Crowe

Clarence E. Crowe

Assistant

CEC-s-wc

APPROVED AUG 21, 1941

s/Gerald C. Mann

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

Approved Opinion Committee By CEC Chairman

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.