Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1943
Status
Published
On the bench
Gerald Mann
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

~THEATTORNEY GENERAL

OF-TEXAS

Aun-rriw ~LTEXAR

GFiRAIDC. MANN

Honorable Geo. H. Sheppard

Comptroller of Public Accounts

Austin, Texas

Dear Mr. Sheppard : Opinion No. O-5333

Re: Whether or not the Board

‘of Control may delegate to

another the authorltg to

approve a voucher claim for

the issuance of a warrant.

Your request for an opinion from this department is as follows:

“This department is In receipt of Fur-

chase Voucher to The Cooper Company, Inc.,

301 South 4th Street, Waco, ,Texas,against

an appropriation made to the Gatesville

School For Boys, Gatesville, Texas.

“The voucher carries the approval of

the Institution Head and appears to,have

been regularly requisitioned through the

Board of Control. It is approved by Mr.

G.B. Carlisle for the Board of Control.

“This department respectfully requests

your opinion as to whether it is authorized

to issue warrant in payment of this voucher

claim that carries the approval of the

Board of Control by G. B. Carlisle. It is

the information of this department that G.B.

Carlisle is Chief, Claims Division, of the

State Board of Control."

The statute (Title 20) defining the powers and duties

of the Board of Control specifically provides for certain divi-

sions; thus, there is a Division of Public'Printing (Art. 607),

Division of Purchasing, (Art. 631), Division of Public Build-

ings and Grounds (Art. 665), Division of Design and Appropri-

(Art 688) Division of Eleemosyn;;;aj"stitutions (Art.

z$r%d Division Af Child Welfare (Art. .

,Article 604 declares that "the Board may from time to

time create such other dlvlsions of its work as may be necessary,

Honorable Gee, H. Sheppard - page 2 O-5333

and appoint chiefs of such divisions, . . . . .'

We are advised by the Chairman of the Board that

there has been no formal creation by the Board of a Claims

D'ivision,but that Mr. Carlisle is an employee of the de-

partment filling the position of Claims Division Chief list-

ed as'Item 16 of~'galaries-- ~Main Office in the current

General Appropriation for that department.

There is no general statute creating the office of

Chiefof the Claims Division nor indeed is there one creating

such a division.

Texas Jurisprudence, Vol. 34, p. 459, Sec. 79, in

compendium style declares:

"It is a general rule'that public

duties must be performed and government-

al powers exercised by the officer or

party designated by law -- that they

can not be delegated to others. This

IS particularly true of duties which

are judicial in their nature, or which

call for the exercise of reasonable dls-

cretion, and which are regarded as a

part of the public trust assumed."

The rule there announced is In keeping with the gen-

eral rule throughout the country'.

In 46 C.J., (p. 1062, Sec. 381) the rule is epitomized

as follows:

"Where, however, provision is made by

statute for the postlon of deputy, such

deputy is regarded as a public officer.'

Whether such alter-ego officer be denominated deputy

or chief, the rule would of course be the same. As said in

Pfeffer v. Mahnke, 260 S,W. 1033:

"The chief clerks are public officers in

the same sense and created by the same legal

authority as other statutory officers of state."

They, of course, exercise their office under precisely the same

authority as the head officer, department or board, as the case

may be -- that is, the statu,teitself.

Where, therefore, the approve1 of the Board of Control

is required, that approval must be the act of the Board es such,

Honorable Gee, H. Sheppard - Page 3 o-5333

or of a statutory deputy, assistant, or other alternate clothed

with such power,

Under the statutes there is no precise method pre-

scribed for evidencing the Board's approval of an Invoice.

There is nothing in your letter, nor otherwise known to us,

to show whether or not the Board has approved the invoice.

You should therefore require satisfactory evidence that it

has done so.

Very truly yours

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

By s/Ocie Speer

Ocie Speer

Assistant

OS-&R-WC

APPROVH) JUN 7, 1943

s/Grover Sellers

FIRST ASSISTANT

ATTORNEY GENERAL

Approved Opinion Committee by s/BR% Chairman

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.