Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1944
Status
Published
On the bench
Grover Sellers
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

;-

-. 609

OFFICE OF THE All-ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

AUSTIN

GROVERSELLERS

~TTQRNEI

GENERAL

Board or Begents

State Teachers Colleges of Texas

Box 756

Austin, Texas

Dear Slrt

bit, and on which I am

al infcirnatlon;. I return

h with the following

090 1s Jaakeonvllle, Texas,

lnted a mabar of the Board of Regents

State Teachers Colleges, and duly~

.

e annual meeting of the Board of Regents

was held in Austin Kay 15, 16, 194.4, and Mr. Kerr

.-~-P~?~WWU (ru um mnt- ir at all possible, it

being the ocoasion of the annual meeting at whioh

matters of great Importance oovering the a&ng

year and biennium are disposed of. fIe oame and

lnaurred the expenses as ahown in the attached

aooount .

-

mrd or Regents, page 2

The question our bae.rd wishes answered

16 whether said account can be paid 5n full,

and If not, what portion of en.“- may be paid

NT-Y.

*We will appraaiata your findings in the

6atter.e

Mr. Kerr’s expense acoount contains an Item ror

tranrrportatlon expenses from ?:asnlngton to Austin an4 return,

together with addltkonal iteine ror meals, hotel aad par diem.

Under the deaislons of our Supreme Court l.n the cases

of Carpenter vs. .She pard, 145 S. iy. (28) 562, end Cramer vs.

Sheppard, 167 S. 2. P26) 147, a civil officer or this Stste does

notvacate or rorralt hi6 civil orrice by joining any branch of

our armed rorces other than the regular army, navy or marine

oorps; We understand that Mr. Kerr is In the naval reserve

rather t&min~ the re@ar navy; ,.oonsequegtly,, the fact that

he 16 in aervlce does not prevent the payment of suoh exp~enses ---

a6 he may actually and neceasarilp lnour in discharging the

duties of his civil 0rri06.

571th respeat to such expenses, Sect&tin 6 of ArtloLe

2647, i. A. C. S., provides:

*The board shall meet each year at Austin, on

the first sonday in By, or as soon thereafter as

praotlcable, for the transeation of business per-

teinlng to the affairs of the State norm1 schoola,

and at 6uch other tlaes and places as a majority

of the menbers of the board deem necessary .for the

relraro or said colleges. “%ch and every nesber of

said board sbal~l receive five dollers per day for

the the spent attending the meetings provided for

ln this law, and in addition. thereto the aloount of

their traveling expenses, said compensation to be

paid to the several ne.mbcrsof the board out of the

appropriation for the support end nointenance of the

said State Teaoners’ College6 as the bosrd nay direct.”

.. ,’

..-._

639_

Board of Regente, page 3

::

3iotIon l!, o?‘Artiole 16 OS the.Texas ,ConstItutIon

-sea& ,+ $ollowa t

. .”

.

,?All 01~11 orfioers~ shaii’ reside withio the

,. ‘,,. S&hta; and all district or oounty offlcora within

~’their .dI:.trIots or counties, and shall keep their

~.‘,ofPIoes at such places as, ssy be required by law!

and ~faIlure to’coqnlg-.wIth this ooniition shall

vsoate the office ao held.*

.,..

Opinion H6. o-3456 by this department reads; in

part, as~followsr.

*In Our opinion, however, the expenses Incurred

by Hr. Eartin in coming to his dIst$Iot from Brown-

wood, where hla military oWica requires him to be

stationed, In orders to parform the duties oi? hla

civil oifioe, and the expenses Incident to the return

trip to Brownwood may not be paid. The expsnaea of

these t$I.ps are not suoh a8 are neoesaarlly Incurred

In dIsohar&ng the duties of the civil offioe of

Dlatrlot Attorney. On the oontrary, the necessity ior

these expenditures. arises out of the holding of the

military Off$C8. The altuatlon, to o,ur mind, Is muoh

the aeme as If’ the Dlstrlot Attorney were compelled,

for personni rsaaons, to make a trip outside of his

dlatrlot, In which event wa think It olear that, though

It would be neoesaary for hI.m to return to hIa diatriot

In order to diecharge the duties of hIa o1~11 office,

he oou1.d not have his expenses inourred in making the

return trip paid by the State any more than he would

be entitled to have the expensea of the going trip

paid by the State. In other words, In neither Instanoe,

ha8 the presenoe of the distriot attorney at the point

outside. of his district been oooasioned by the neoesaity

of dIsoharf$ng a duty inoident to his civil otl’ioa 83

DIatrIot Attorney, and it la only such traveling ex-

penses as ore necesaarI.ly Inrurrcd in diaoharglng the

dutfea of the civil oittda of Diatriot Attorney whlah

map be paid to the oifioer as District Attornay.*

In view of the foregoing authoritIes,It Is the opinl~a

of this department that Hr. .5srr Is only entftled to receive

Board or Kegants~, page. I;

floe dollars per day for the time spent attsndlnp, iiha mestinga

of the Board of Fegsnts of the State l’eaohera Collqas, and In

addition thereto, the amount of his travollng axpcnses f’rom

~nokaonville, Texas, hfs legal residence, to Austin, Texas,and

?he return trip from Austin to Jaoksonville.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.