Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1947
Status
Published
On the bench
Price Daniel
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

XAS

Aucvrrnr II:TEXAS

PRICE DANIEL

ATTORNEY GENERAL

.

,llaroh~ 26, 1947

Hon. W. Riley Wyatt, Chairman

State Prison Board

San Antonio, Texas Opinion Ro. V-105

Be: Authority OS ?risoa

Board to direct gen-

eral manager to permit

the use of inmate labor

on sewage project with

Dear Mr. Wyatt: the City of Huntsville.

Your request for aa opinion on the above cap-

.tioned subjeot reads as follows:

‘The Texas State Board of Health has

-pract lcally condemned the exist Lag sewage

disposal plant in Huntsville as Inadequate.

“The Clt of tiuntsvllle has always

handled the dI sposal of sewage from the prl-

son sjrstem in Huntsville since the prison

has no sewage disposal plant of its own.

At present, it is estimated the aewage

flow iron the prison syetea coast’itutes

one-third of the estimated total normal

flow to the sewage treatment plant.

“The City of H~tsvllle has never im-

posed a sewer service charge on the prison

-. system because of, a contract entered into

between the city aad the prison system,

which provides that the prison sgstea will

pay its’ prorata share of the coat of any im-

provements dr e#ienaions at the oity’8 aewer

disposal plant.

“In view of the foregoing hazards, the

Texas State Board of Health has directed

the Cit,y of Huntsville to take steps inane-

diatelg to correct the condition existing,

and pith, referenoe to this sewage the City

of Huntsville has called upoh the prlaon

.- ._

ElOIl. M. Riley Wyatt, Page 2, V-105

board to furnish Inmate labor in the con-

struction of this sewer extension program.

“In view of the contract heretofore

entered into (aopy of which is herewith en-

cloeed), and further in view of the benefits

to accrue to the prison board, can the prl-

son board authorize the general manager to

permit the use of Inmate labor on’ this pro-

ject?”

Article 6166a, of Vernon’s Civil Statutes,

reads In part as follows:

’ * * * All persons shall be worked

within the prison walls and upon farms owned

or leased by the State; and in no event shall

the labor of a prisoner be sold to any con-

tractor or lessee to work on farms or else-

where, nor shall any prisoner be worked on

any farm or otherwise upon shares except

such farms be owned or leased by the State

of Texas. ”

In Opinion No. O-4322, addressed to Mr. S.,M.

Lister, dated April 15, 1942, thi.s Department held that

the Texas Prison Board does not have authority under Ar-

ticle 6166a, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, to permit the use

of trusty prisoners by State offi,cials, members of the

Prison Board, and employees of the prison system. In

Opinion No. O-4727, dated July 3l, 1942, this Department

held that while Article ,61660 authorizes the Prison

Board to lease real estate for agricultural or grazing

purposes, it was of the opinion that this does not auth-

orize the contracting of convict labor under the cloak

of a lease of real estate, and that Article 61660 must

be construed together with Article 6166a, in that the

employment of convicts as guards in the operation of

the prison system is so obviously opposed to the gener-

al principles and the statutory policies hereinabove .

mentioned and discussed, that the power will not be im-

plied as incident to the general power of the manage,r

to control the prison system; that authority was not

vested to use convicts as guards to replace employed

guards.

The Iegislat ure , in its regular biennial ap-

propriation, provides for the various employees and

I&Q&I.

M. RUey Wyatt, Pag&3, V-105

operation of the Texas Prison System. It was the evi-

dent intention of the Legisinture to prohibit the use

of convict labor In the performance of work pertaining

to the prison system, when such work is to be performed

outside the prison walls, and not on the farms owned or

leased by the prison system.

The manifest intention of Article 6166a com-

pels us to answer that convict labor may not be tised

outside the prison walls and off of State property for

construction of sewerage lines in the City of Hunts-

vllle.

SUMMAFiY

Texas Prison Board is not authorized

to direct the general manager to permit the

use of inmate labor on sewage project out-

side walls or off of farms of Texas Penlten-

tiary. (Article 6166a, V. C. 3.)

Yours very truly,

ATTORNEY

GEI’iFXAL

OF TEXAS

BY

Assistant

APPROVED

NAR. 26, 1947

A3:JMc:mrj A&d&

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.