Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1947
Status
Published
On the bench
Price Daniel
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

I'RICEDANIEL

ATTORNEYGENERA,.

October 1, 1947

Hon. Geo. H. Sheppard opinion Ho. v-394

Comptrollerof ?ublic Accouuts

Austin, Texas Re: Legality

_. of

^ the- in- ;

cumxon or mea18

ana lodgings in

Austin on the ex-

pense accounts of

members of the

State Board of Eair-

dressers ana Cosme-

tologists.

Reference is made to your recent request for

an opinion of this Department which reads as follows:

“Senate Blll No. 131, of the Fiftieth

Legislatureprovides Par the members oP the

state Board of Hairdressersaad cosnetolo-

gists to receive $3,600 per gear paya.blein

even monthly installmentstogether with

actual expenses incurred in the performance

of their officia~lduties.

"Please advise iP the members of’ this

Board can be reimbursea for meals and lodg-

ings, in the city of Austin, in which Is

located the Boara of Hairdressersand Cosne-

tologists."

Senate Bill No. 131 of the 50th Legislature,

1947, amended Section 7 of Article 73&b, V.P.C., to read

as follows:

'The members of the Boara shall each

receive a salary of Three Thousand Six

Hundred ($3,600.00)Ddllars per year, pay-

able in equal monthly pagrents, together

with aotual expenses incurred in the per-

formance of their official duties, pro-

viding such expenses shall be allowea if

and when waited, approved and allowed by

. .

Ron ; Geo. H. Sheppard - Page 2 (V-394)

the State Comptroller. Such salary ef the

Board members ana the Executive Setiretarg

as well as all other expenses incidental

to the discharge of their duties, shall be

allowed, includingreasonable expenses in

attending schools for the purpose of taking

post graduate coumes in beauty culture

only and attending conventionsof beauty

culturists,both state and national;'pro-

viding in no eveht shall such expenses for

shy 0ne Board member exaeed the sum of One

Hundred ($100.00)Dollars for any one con-

vention or post graduate course attended

within the State nox more than Two Hundred

($200.00)Dollars for any 0ne conventionor

post graduate course attended out of the

state; provided that no more than one mem-

ber of the Board shall be absent Prom hia

regular auties wasa BOara meviberat any

time PIP the ,gurpose,oftaking such post

graduate work only 'andthat no Board member

shall attend (or take) ~0~4 than ones(1)

such post graduate c0ume duping any one

(1) calendar ear extenaihg over not more

than a two (23 weeks period. All salaries

and expenses shall be paid out of the,Ptuu¶

in the State Treasury to the credit of the

Texas Board of Cosmetologyon requisition

signed by the President and Semetary,of

;;;l;;.r$ and a warrant of the State Comp-

.

In Item 18 under title State Board of Halr-

dressers ana Cosmetologistsof the general appropriation,

there is an appropriationof $6,000.00 for Board members'

travel expense.

Under the general provisions of the Approprl-

ation Dill OP the 50th Legislature,1947, Subsection "b"

of Section 11, we find the following:

"The Comptrollershall not pay, and no

State officer 0~ employee of any of the depart-

ments or other agencies oP the government shall

include in his traveling expense account any

amounts for reals and/or lodging incurred with-

in the oity OP town where such,offioer or such

employee is stationedsSuch enployees as are

stationedaway from their main 0?'fi0eoF

Eon. Geo. H. Sheppard - Page.3 (V-394)

headquarterswho are not allowed traveling

expenses where so stationed shall be allowed

such expenses when called to their main of-

fice.'

In your letter you do not state whether the

Board members are residing in the City of Austin or not.

But inasmuch as the Board of Cosmetologyhas located

the office in Austin, we assume that all the Board mem-

bers reside in Austin. On January 27, 1917, this De-

partment rendered an opinion to the Chief Deputy Game,

Fish and Oyster Commissioner,who was living in the City

of Austin, which stated as Pollows:

"In our opinion the items in the

various appropriationbills providing for

the payment OP traveling expenses relate

only to the expense of any officer or em-

ployee while on the road traveling on busi-

ness of the State away from the office of

such department and from his place of abode

where such department is located, and there

is no authority in law for allowance of any

living expense account of any officer or

employee while he is in the city OP Austin

under the guise of a traveling expense ac-

count." (A. G. Op. No. 1700, Bk. 40, p. 442)

Since the Board members are now on a salary

basis and in view of the foregoing, it is the opinion of

this Department that the members of the Board of Cosme-

tology cannot be reimbursedfor meals ana lodgings in

the City OP Austin.

SUMMARY

Members of the State Board of Rair-

dressers and Cosmetologistsliving in Austin

cannot be reimbursed Por meals and lodgings

in the City of Austin, their office being

located in that city.

APPROVED: Very truly yours

ATTORREY GERERAL OF TEXAS

FI ST ASSISTANT

AT ORREY GERERAL

"h7""$"" "4SeF

Assistant

BA:djrn

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.