Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1951
Status
Published
On the bench
Price Daniel
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

August 17, 1951

Hon. Larry 0. Cox

Executive Director

Board for Texas State Hospitals

and Special Schools

Austin, Texas Opinion No. V-1240

Re: Necessity for advance quar-

terly budget approval by the

Legislative Budget Board

prior to expenditures from

the State Hospitals and Special

Dear Sir: Schools Building Fund.

Your request for an opinion reads, in part, as follows:

* . . . it has become necessary to request the

opinion of your Department as to whether or not this

Board is required by law to obtain quarterly budget

approval from the Legislative Budget Board prior to

obligating or expending any of those funds credited

to the State Hospitals and Special Schools Building

Fund and appropriated to this Board by the provisions

of Section 26, Article II, House Bill No. 426, Regular

Session, Fifty-second Legislature.

“These provisions read in part as follows:

” ‘Sec. 26. (a) There is hereby appropriated to

the Board for Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools

Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) for each fiscal year

of the biennium ending August 31, 1953. Such funds are

to be credited to the State Hospitals and Special Schools

Building Fund which is the same hospital building fund

as provided for in House Bill No. 2, First Called Ses-

sion, Fifty-first Legislature.

“6 . . .

.

Hon. Larry 0. Cox, Page 2 (V-1240)

* ‘(b) All funds credited to the State Hospitals

and Special Schools Building Fund under this Arti-

cle are hereby appropriated to the Board for Texas

State Hospitals and Special Schools for the purpose

of architectural and engineering plans, construct-

ing, repairing, and equipping such buildings as in

the opinion of the Board are necessary to the proper

care of those committed or to be committed to such

hospitals and special schools according to law. Pro-

vided, however, the fees paid to an architect shall not

exceed six per cent (6%) for the plans, specifications

and. supervision of construction of said buildings and

all construction contracts made for, and the final ac-

ceptance in connection with such construction, other

than the plans and specifications, shall be subject to

the review and approval of the Board of Control. The

Board may contract for, and pay for plans and speci-

fications for any contemplated construction, even

though the contract for such plans and specifications

may be made in one (1) year and the contract for con-

struction is entered into the following year.’

“Section 14, Article II, House Bill No. 426, Regu-

lar Session, Fifty-second Legislature, is entitled

‘Quarterly Budgets’ and provides that:

” ‘The Legislative Budget Board shall require

quarterly budget approval prior to the obligation or

expenditure of any of the funds appropriated to the

Board institutions and the Central Office in this Arti-

cle. No moneys herein appropriated shall be expended

until such budget approval shall have been secured.’

[Emphasis added.]

“It is the opinion of this Board that the provisions

of Section 26 of this Article are in no way affected by

the budgetary requirements set forth in Section 14 of

the Article in that Section 14 relates to ordinary oper-

ating expenditures of the central office and the several

institutions under the Board’s control and management,

and not to construction expenditures to be made by the

Board itself out of the State Hospitals and Special

Schools Building Fund. Restated, it is the Board’s

. .

Hon. Larry 0. Cox, Page 3 (V-1240)

opinion that these latter expenditures are to be gov-

erned solely by the provisions of Section 26 of Arti-

cle II.”

Section 1, Article II of House Bill No. 426 contains

specific appropriations for the support and maintenance of each

hospital and special school named therein and the Central Office

of the Board for Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools for

each fiscal year of the biennium beginning September 1, 1951.

No part of any of these appropriations is payable out of the ap-

propriations to the Board contained in Section 26 of Article II.

Section 14 of Article II reads as follows:

“The Legislative Budget Board shall require

quarterly budget approval prior to the obligation or

expenditure of any of the funds appropriated to the

Board institutions and the Central Office in this Arti-

cle. No moneys herein appropriated shall be expended

until such budget approval shall have been secured.”

Section 26 of Article II contains an appropriation to the

Board for Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools of $S.OOO,-

000 out of the State Hospitals and Special Schools Building Fund

created by the Legislature in 1950 (H.B. 2, Acts Slst Leg., 1st

C.S., ch. 1, p.1) for each fiscal year of the biennium beginning

September 1, 1951 “for the purpose of architectural and engi-

neering plans, constructing, repairing, and equipping such build-

ings as in the opinion of the Board are necessary to the proper

care of those committed or to be committed to such hospitals

and special schools according to law.”

Subsection (c) of Section 26 of Article II reads as fol-

lows :

“It is hereby declared the intent and policy of

the Fifty-second Legislature that the Board shall use

such moneys from the State Hospitals and Special

Schools Building Fund as may be required to repair

and rehabilitate existing buildings and facilities. n

Subsection (f) of Section 10 of Article II provides:

“The Board is authorized to employ such ad-

ditional laborers, skilled laborers, and mechanics

as may be necessary to carry out such major re-

pair and rehabilitation projects which may be fi-

nanced from moneys of the State Hospitals and Spe-

Hon. Larry 0. Cox, Page 4 (V-1240)

cial Schools Building Fund, in accordance with the

provisions of Section 26 (c) of this Article. Salaries

for such employees shall not exceed the prevailing

wage scale in the locality where the work is done.”

We have found no other provisions in Article 11 which

pertain to your question. It is from this Article, the above

mentioned provisions thereof, and the Act creating the Building

Fund that we must determine whether the Legislature intended

for the provisions of Section 14 to apply to the appropriations

to the Board contained in Section 26.

The Legislative Budget Board was created in 1949.

Acts Slst Leg., R.S., ch. 487, p. 908. The act creating the State

Hospitals and Special Schools Building Fund was passed in 1’950.

Acts 51st Leg., 1st C.S., ch. 1, p. 1. This Act increased the tax-

es on cigarettes until August 31, 1957, and provided that a cer-

tain per cent of the net revenue derived from each of the two

classes of cigarettes defined therein shall be credited to the

Building Fund. It also provided that an amount not to exceed

$S,OOO,OOO shall be credited to such fund for the biennium end-

ing August 31, 1951, and an amount not to exceed $S,OOO,OOg

shall be deposited to the credit of such fund for each fiscal year

thereafter.

The Act contained an appropriation to the Board which

read as follows:

“All funds credited to the State Hospitals and

Special Schools Building Fund under this Act are

hereby appropriated to the Board for Texas State

Hospitals and Special Schools for the purpose of

constructing, repairing and equipping such buildings

as in the opinion of the Board are necessary to the

proper care of those committed or to be committed

to such hospitals and special schools according to

law. Provided, however, the fees paid to an archi-

tect shall not exceed six per cent (6%) for the plans,

specifications and supervisions of said buildings

and all contracts made for and the final acceptance

in connection with such construction other than the

plans and specifications, shall be subject to the re-

view and approval of the Board of Control.”

The Act did not further restrict or restrain the Board

. .

Hon. Larry 0. Cox, Page 5 (V-1240)

in the expenditure of the, appropriations for constructing, re-

pairing, and equipping such buildings as in its opinion are nec-

essary for the proper care of inmates. It contains no reference

whatever to the Legislative Budget Board, which had been prev-

iously created.

There is no material difference in the language found

in that appropriation and the language used by the Legislature

in Section 26 of Article II to make the appropriations contained

therein to the -Board.

The only appropriations contained in Section 1 of Arti-

cle II are “to the Board institutions and the Central 0ffice”of

the Board. The requirement of quarterly budget approval prior

to the obligation or expenditures of any of the funds appropriated

to such institutions or Central Office by the Legislative Budget

Board as provided in the first sentence of Section 14 is applica-

ble only to such appropriations. Since the money appropriated

in Section 26 is to the Board and not to any particular institution

or institutions, it necessarily follows that such appropriations

do not come within the purview of Section 14, unless the conclud-

ing sentence in that Section is applicable to them. That sentence

reads as follows:

‘No moneys herein appropriated shall be expended

until such budget approval shall have been obtained.”

This sentence must be read and considered with the

sentence which precedes it. In other words, all the provisions

of Section 14 must be read and considered together for the pur-

pose of ascertaining the legislative intent. When so read and

considered in connection with all other pertinent facts and cir-

cumstances heretofore noted, we have concluded that the Legis-

lature intended for this sentence to apply only to the appropria-

tions contained in Section 1 of Article II “to the Board institu-

tions and Central Office” specifically mentioned in the first sen-

tence of Section 14.

Consequently, you are advised that we concur in the

opinion of your Board that the provisions of Section 14, Article

II of House Bill No. 426, Acts 52nd Leg., 1951. do not apply to

the appropriations to the Board for Texas State Hospitals and

Special Schools contained in Section 26 of Article II. In answer-

ing this question we have not passed upon or considered the

Hon. Larry 0. Cox. Page 6 (V-1240)

constitutionality of Section 14, Article II of House Bill No. 426,

supra.

SUMMARY

The provisions of Section 14, Article II of House

Bill No. 426, Acts 52nd Leg., R.S., 1951, do not apply

to the app~ropriations to the Board for Texas State

Hospitals and Special Schools contained in Section 26

of Article II of House Bill No. 426 for the purpose of

constructing and repairing buildings.

APPROVED: Yours very, truly,

C. K. Richards PRICE DANIEL

Trial & Appellate Division Attorney General

Everett Hutchinson

Executive Assistant

Charles D. Mathews Bruce W. Bryant

First Assistant Assistant

BWB:wb:mf

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.