Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1952
Status
Published
On the bench
Price Daniel
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 44.0%

The opinion

PRICE DANIEL

Auen~~~.'iIkxas

ATT..Rh-RY

~~iS~z*..x.

August 8, 1952

Hon. Coke R. Stevenson, Jr.

Administrator

Texas Liquor Control Board

Austin, Texas Opinion po. v-1500

Re: Application of Saction 37

of Article 666-17; Ver-

non's Penal Code, to the

sale of confiscated alco-

holic beverages by the

Dear Mr. Stevenson: Texas Liquor Control Board.

Your request for the opinion of this office reads

in part as follows:

"We desire your valued opinion on each of

the following questions relating to the action

of this Department in advertising for, accept-

ing or rejecting sealed bids for the purchase

of confiscated alcoholic beverages from this

Department.

"(1) Whether or not this Department has

the authority to reject a high bid received

from a Package Store Permittee whose name IS

carried on the Board's Delinquent Account List

at the time the bids are opened.

"(2) Whether or not the Board has the au-

thority in advertising for the sale of confis-

cated alcoholic beverages, to also publish

notice that bids will not be accepted from any

permlttee whose name appears on the Board's

Delinquent Account List at the time the sealed

bids are opened."

Article 666-30, Vernon's Penal Code, provides,

In part, a8 follows:

"(a) All alcoholic beverages and the con-

tainers thereof, and any device in which the

alcoholic beverage Is packaged, equipment, and

other property forfeited to the State, unless

Hon. Coke R. Stevenson, Jr., page 2, (V-1500)

otherwise herein provided, and all illicit

beverages and the containers thereof, and

any device in which the alcoholic beverage

Is packaged Is forfeited to the State, shall

be turned over to the Board for public or

private sale In such place and manner as It

may deem best: provided, that the Board

shall exercise diligent effort to obtain the

best available price for anything thus sold:

provided, further, that any bill of sale

executed by the Board or Administrator shall

convev a nood and valid title to the nur-

chaser as-to any such property sold. *The

Board shall sell alcoholic beverages only to

the holders of qualified permits or licenses."

(Emphasis added.)

Sectlon 37 of Article 666-17, Vernon's Penal

Code,provides:

"It shall be unlawful for any Whole-

saler, Class B Wholesaler, Class A Winery

or Wine Bottler to sell any alcoholic bev-

erage, nor shall any Package Store Per-

mittee, Wine Only Package Store Permittee,

or other retailer purchase any alcoholic

beverage, except for cash or on terms re-

quiring payment by the purchaser as follows:

On purchases made from the first to fif-

teenth day inclusive of each calendar month,

payment must be made on or before the twenty-

fifth day of the same calendar month: and,

on purchases made from the sixteenth to the

last day inclusive of each calendar month,

payment must be made on or before the tenth

day of the succeeding calendar month. Every

delivery of alcoholic beverage must be ac-

companied by an invoice of sale giving the

date of purchase of such alcoholic beverage.

In the event any Package Store Permittee,

Wine Only Package Store Permittee, or other

retail dealer becomes delinquent in the pay-

ment of any account due for alcoholic bev-

erages purchased, (that is, if he fails to

make full payment on or before the date here-

inbefore provided) then it shall be the duty

of the Wholesaler, Class B Wholesaler, Class

A Winery or Wine Bottler to report the fact

immediately to the Board or Administrator Ln

Eon. Coke R. Stevenson, Jr., page 3, (V-1500)

writing. Any Packsge Store Permittee, Wine

Only Package Store permittee, or other re-

tail dealer who becomes delinquent shall not

be permitted to purchase alcoholic beverages

from any Wholesaler, Class B Wholesaler,

Class A Winery or Wine Bottler until said de-

linquent account is paid in full, and the

delinquent account shall be cleared from the

records of the Board before any Wholesaler,

Class B Wholesaler, Class A Winery or Wine

Bottler will be permitted to sell alcoholic

beverages to him. Any Wholesaler, Class B

Wholesaler, Class A Winery or Wine Bottler

who accepts postdated checks, notes or memo-

randa or who participates in any scheme,

trick or deViC8 to assist any Package Store

Permittee, Wine Only Package Store Permittee

or other retail dealer In the violation of

this Section shall likewise be guilty of a

violation of this Section. The Board shall

have the power and it shall be its duty to

adopt rules and regulations Riving full

Porte and effect to this section.,”(Emphasis

added. )

In Texas Liquor Control Board v. Floyd, 117 S.W.

2d 53C (Tex. civ. App. 1938)) the court said:

“The Texas Liquor Control Board Is by

virtue of the law an administrative branch

of the State government, to wNch has been

delegated, by law, certain functions, among

which are determining in the first place to

whom and when shall certain privileges be

extended to persons to sell liquors, and

second, whether or not such persons so fa-

vored have breached the conditions under

which the privilege has been granted.

” . . . It has been held that the Act

under consideration must be liberally con-

strued by the courts so as to make it ef-

fective) according to the expressed and im-

plied intention of the Legislature.”

The purpose of Section 37 of Article 666-17 Is

discussed In Attorney General Opinion V-1126 (1950). As

pointed out in that opinion, the provision is one for the

purpose of maintaining the independence of the wholesale

and retail levels of the liquor Industry in Texas.

Hon. Coke R. Stevenson, Jr., page 4, (V-1500)

In order to make the provisions against affilia-

tion between retailer and wholesaler effective, the Legis-

lature has prohibited the extension of credit by the lat-

ter to the former beyond the time stipulated. To make the

prohibition against excessive extension of credit effec-

tive, the Legislature has provided, in effect, that upon

violation of the provisions, the retailer Is prohibited

from purchasing liquor from the wholesalers and the latter

are also prohibited from selling to him. The sanction

against the retailer Is, in practical effect, a suspension

of the privilege of purchasing liquor for resale until the

account Is paid and the payment reported in the due course

of the operation of the reporting machinery set up by the

Board under the act.

Under Article 666-30, in making provision for

disposition,of confiscated liquor the Board Is authorized

to sell such liquor, but only to "qualified" licensees

and permittees. The question here Is whether a retailer

in such delinquency status i8 a "qualified" licensee or

permittee at the time of the sale.

It is our opinion that only a permittee or li-

censee who is "qualified" to purchase liquor for resale

is "qualified" to purchase confiscated liquor from the

Board. There is no specific statutory definition of

"quallfledn permittees or licensees,.and itisnecessazyto

look to the purpose and scheme of the statute in this

respect to determine who the Legislature Intended should

be qualified to purchase confiscated liquor. It is not

reasonable to assume'that one who is disqualified from

purchasing liquor at wholesale generally is to be con-

sidered qualified to purchase confiscated liquor, and

certainly not one whose general~dlsqualiflcatlon arises

from a violation of the statute.

As a matter of fact, Only a r8latiV8ly few

classes of permittees are expressly authorized to pur-

chase liquor for resale to either dealers or consumers,

and fewer still are authorized to purchase the finished

and packaged product. See Article 666-15, Vernon's

Penal Code. Therefore, a "qualified" licensee or per-

mittee must not only hold a license which authorizes

generally the purchase of the type of liquor put up for

sale by the Board, but in our opinion, his privilege of

purchasing liquors under such license or permit must be

currently In effect.

Hon. Coke R. Stevenson, Jr., page 5, (V-1500)

It is our opinion that the Board, in advertls-

lng for the sale of confiscated alcoholic beverages, may

state the conditions on which bids will be accepted.

Since the Board must reject bids received from delinquent

permittees, It may publish a notice that such bids will

not be accepted.

SUMMARY

The Liquor Control Board is not author-

ized to sell confiscated alcoholic beverages

to retailers who are delinquent in their whole-

sale purchase accounts, Under the provisions

of Section 37 of Article 666-17, Vernon’s Penal

Code. The Board must reject bids by such re-

tailers and may state such disqualification in

advertising for bids on such liquor.

Yours very truly,

PRICE DANIEL

APPROVED: Attorney General

Red McDaniel

State Affairs Mvision

Mary E. Wall

Reviewing Assistant

Charles S. Mathews

First Assistant

JD/rt/ec

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.