Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1960
Status
Published
On the bench
Will Wilson
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 3.5%

The opinion

THEATTORNEY GENERAL

OF TEXAS

Awsm 11. TEXAS

WI& WILSON

AlTORNEY GENE- June 27, 1960

Honorable Joe Resweber Opinion NO. W-869

County Attorney

Harris County Re: What political subdi-

Harris County Courthouse vision or agency of the

Houston 2, Texas State Is liable for the

cost of an election on

the question of the cre-

ation of a Junior College

District, and related

Dear Mr. Resweber: questions.

Your recent request for an opinion from this office

reads as follows:

"The Commissioners Court of Harris County,

in accordance with the rovlsions of Sets. 17,

18, 19 and 20 of Art. 2t; 15h of Vernon's Ann.

Clv. Statutes, has ordered an election to be

held throughout the area of five Independent

School Districts on May 31, 1960, to determine

whether or not there shall be created a Union

Junior College District; the election of a

Board of Seven Trustees for such district, and

whether a ax should be levied and collected

for the sup ko .rt PnA maintenance of such Union Jun-

ior College District.. Inasmuch as the provisions

of Art. 2dlbh cited above contain no specific

directive as to who shall bear the expense of

the election, we have been requested to secure

the opinion of the Attorney General, as soon

as possible on the following questions:

"1. What political subdivision or agency

of the State Is liable for the costs of such

election?

"2. What Is the effect of an election

petition for a Union Junior College District

presented to and passed on by only the County

Board of Education of Harris County when a

part of one of the school districts encompass-

ed by the proposed Union Junior College lies

Honorable Joe Resweber, page 2 (W-869)

outside Harris County and within the bound-

aries of another county?"

Section 17, Article 2815h, Vernon's Civil Statutes, pro-

vides in part as follows:

"Sec. 17. Two or more contiguous lnde-

pendent school districts or two or more con-

tiguous common school districts, or a combi-

nation composed of one or more Independent

school districts, with one or more common

school districts of contiguous territory, hav-

ing a combined taxable wealth of not less than

$9,500,000.00 and having a scholastic popu-

lation of not less than 7,000 the next preced-

ing school year, and not less than 400 students

In the last four years in the classified high

schools of said district, may, by vote of the

qualified voters of the said territory, estab-

lish and maintain a Union Junior College. . . .)l

School Districts are quasi-public or municipal cor-

porations that derive their powers by delegation from

the State. Independent School District of City of El

Paso v. Central Education Agency, 247 S W 2d 597 The

Legislature, by providing that two or more school'dls-

tricts may by vote establish a Union Junior College. was

not just outlining certain areas that mightform Junior

College Districts. It was granting these "state entities"

the authority and the right to establish them for the

benefit of the school districts and thelr school systems.

Section 18, Article 2815h, Vernon's Civil Statutes,

provides in essence, that whenever it is proposed to es-

tablish a Union Junior College, a petition praying for an

election must be presented, signed by ten percent of the

qualified taxpaying voters of each of the school districts

within the proposed territory. This contemplates that each

such district, as a district, Is required to take specific

steps, not by the existing school boards, but by the quali-

fled taxpaylng voters of each of the districts within the

territory of the proposed Union Junior College.

In Attorney General's Opinion No. 0-7187 (1946), it

was held that the expense of a special election to determine

. .

Honorable Joe Resweber, page 3 (w-869)

whether or not a school district shall be annexed to a

Junior College District should be paid by the district

In which the election Is held. The opinion seemsto in-

dicate that this Is an e~lectlonin connection with or ln-

cidental to a school district election and should be paid

by the district in accordance with Article 2746b, Vernon's

Civil Statutes. This Article provides:

"All expenses Incurred in connection with

or Incidental to any school district election

in connected with the public school within such

school district shall be paid out of the avall-

able maintenance fund belonging to such district

for the fiscal year during which such election

is held, or out of funds accruing to said dls-

trlct for the next ensuing fiscal year; pro-

vided, however, that the payment of any such ex-

penses out of the funds accrued or to accrue to

such school district for the fiscal year after

the year In which such election Is held shall be

authorized by the county superintendent prior to

the holding of such election. Acts 1935, 44th

Leg., P. 135, ch. 55, 8 3."

We think the same reasoning would analy to the elec-

tion here Involved, even though the method of calling the

election may differ. In annexation to Junior College

Districts, the County Board of Education or the Commls-

sioners Court calls the election after a petition signed

by five percent of the property taxpaying voters has been

presented to them. (Article 281511,Sec. 21). In the elec-

tion here involved, the Commissioners Court calls the elec-

tion.

Past Attorneys General Opinions seem to Indicate that

It does not matter who calls the election. If It Involves

a school district, they must bear the expense even though

it is a special election. Opinions numbered O-6683 (1945),

0-718 (Ig46), O-4919 (1942), 0-1323 (1939) and 0-623

(19397 hold that even though the County Judge calls the elec-

tion, the school districts involved must bear the expense

according to Article 2746b, Vernon's Civil Statutes.

We are therefore of the opinion that in answer to your

first questlon, the Independent School Districts of

. *

Honorable Joe Resweber, page 4 (w-869)

Channelview, Deer Park, Galena Park, LaPorte and Pasadena

must pay the expense of such election In accordance with

Article 274613of Vernon's Civil Statutes.

We are cognizant of Opinion No. O-4170 (1941), which

holds that Bexar County must pay the expense 'of holding

the election to determine whether a Junior College Dls-

trict of Bexar County shall be created. This opinion

involved Bexar County as a whole. It Is reasoned that

this was a called special election, therefore, the county

should pay the expenses under Article 2943 (now Article

3.08, Election Code) and Article 2996 (now Article 7.12

Election Code). There were no school districts Involved.

This holding was correct and does not conflict with the

result reached here.

Your second question again stated is:

"2. What Is the effect of an election

petition for a Union Junior College District

presented to and passed on by only the County

Board of Education of Harris County when a

part of one of the school districts encompas-

sed by the proposed Union Junior College lies

outside Harris County and within the boundaries

of another county?

Section 18, Article 2815h, Vernon's Civil Statutes pro-

vides:

In case of a Union Junior College

Dlstrlct'the petition shall be signed by not

fewer than ten percent of the qualified tax-

paying voters of each of the school districts

within the territory of the proposed Union

Junior College District and shall be present-

ed to the County Board of Education or 3oards

of Education of their respective counties if

the territory encompasses more than one county.

In case there is no County Board of Education,

the petition shall be presented to the Commis-

sioners Court or Commissioners Courts of the

county or counties Involved. . . . It shall

thereupon become the duty of the Board or

Boards, or the Commissioners Court or Courts

Honorable Joe Resweber, page 5 (w-869)

80 oetitloned to pass upon the legality of

the p:titlon and the enulneness of the same.

. . . (Emphasis ours7 .

The Independent School Districts of Channelview,

Deer Park, Galena Park, LaPorte and Pasadena have oetl-

tloned the County Board of Education of Harris County

for the establishment of a Union Junior College. The

Board passed upon the legality and genuineness of same

and forwarded the petition to the State Board of Educa-

tion in accordance with the statutes.

Your questlon, in effect, concerns the legal suffi-

ciency of the petition inasmuch as part of the LaPorte

School District lies In Chambers County and no petition

was filed In said county.

We are of the opinion that the presentation of the

petition only to the Board of Education in Harris County

was sufficient. There are approximately 5,250 acres of

submerged land in Galveston Bay that are In Chambers

County and the school district of LaPorbe. All of this

acreage in Chambers County is covered with water except

for an Island near the ship channel. This Island was

built by dredging the channel and the entire area is un-

inhabited. The school district does not tax any property

in Chambers County. Even though the island is above the

surface, there Is no property on the island that is taxed

and no real estate on the Island that Is taxed.

The LaPorte School District is now and has always

been under the supervision and control of the Harris

County Board of Education. Chambers County has never ex-

ercised any authority over this school district.

The situation here is unique. Although the statute

clearly states that If the territory encompasses more than

one county, the petition shall be presented to each county

board, we feel that this Is unnecessary in the situation

here. There will be no election held in Chambers County.

There Is no property in Chambers County that is taxed by

the school district and there are no citizens of Chambers

County attending the public schools of LaPorte. Because

of this, Chambers County will not be affected at this time.

Honorable Joe Resweber, page 6 (W-869)

This county would be uninterested and would lack the in-

formation necessary to determine the legality and genulne-

ness of the petition if it were presented to it. The law

does not contemplate doing a useless thing.

For these reasons, the petition presented only to the

Board of Education in Harris County will suffice.

SUMMARY

In an election by school districts to

determine whether a Union Junior College

shall be established, the expense of

such election shall be paid by the school

districts in accordance with Article 2746b,

Vernon's Civil Statutes.

Under the facts as herein set forth, a

petition to form a Union Junior College

District presented only to the Harris

County Board of Education is sufficient,

even though part of one of the forming

school districts is within another county.

Yours very truly,

WILL WILSON

Attorney General of Texas

JMF:ms

APPROVED:

OPINION COMMITTEE

W. V. Geppert, Chairman

John Reeves

Mary K. Wall

B. OH. Tlmmins, Jr.

REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

BY: Leonard Passmore

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.