Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1961
Status
Published
On the bench
Will Wilson
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Avsnrv 11. TEXAS

WILL WIlLSON

AT-rOWNEY oE)NmsR*E

August 21, 1961

Honorable Joseph C. Ternus

County Attorney

San Patricia County

Sinton, Texas Opinion No. WW-1121

Re: Duties of County Auditor

in regard to purchases

Dear Mr. Ternus: by the County.

In your letter of August 3, 1961, you have

requested our opinion on three questions posed by the

County Auditor of San Patricia County. Quoting from

the County Auditor's letter to you, these questions

will be set forth as they are discussed.

"1. Who is the purchasing agent

for San Patricia County, Texas?"

Article 1645a-1 Vernon's Civil Statutes,

purports to authorize the County Auditor to serve as

purchasing agent in counties with a population of not

less than 24,125 nor more than 24,150, counties of not

less than 43,000 nor more than 43,100, certaincouni;ies

of not less than 65,000, and counties of not less than

90,000 nor more than 225,000. Article 1645h, Vernon's

Civil Statutes, purports to provide to the same effect

in counties with a population of not less than 41,680

nor more than 42,000. Without passing on the constitu-

tionality of such population brackets, suffice it to

say that San Patricia County, with a population of

45,021 according to the last federal census, does not

fall within the operative effect of either article.

In counties with a population of 73,000

or more a county purchasing agent may be appointed by

a board composed of the county judge and the district

judge or judges of the county. Acts 56th Leg., R.S.,

1959, p. 913, ch. 418. Again the population of San

Patrlcio County fails to bring It within the statute.

Lacking statutory authority, a county auditor

has no duty to act as purchasing agent for the county.

He need only perform those limited functions of the

Honorable Joseph C. Ternus, page 2 (WW-1121)

purchasing process that are conferred upon him by statute.

Attorney General's Opinion No. O-1338 (1939). We are

led to conclude that there is no "purchasing agent" as

such, for San Patricia County.

"2. Will you please define my

duties connected with the pur-

chasing function? I believe

that Articles 1659 and 1661 of

Ternon 'i3Texas Statutes require

that I am responsible for the

following:

a. Advertise for bids stating

where specifications are

located.

b. Keep a record of competi-

tive bids on file.

c. Furnish Commissioners Court

with copy of bids received.

d. Fleadvertisefor bids when

necessary.

e. Receive a copy of purchase

requisition from officer

desiring the purchase.

"So far as I know, the above duties are

those prescribed for me to perform

connected with the purchasing function.

You are requested to outline my duties

connected with the purchasing function

according to xour interpretation of

the statutes.

Article 1659, Vernon's Civil Statutes, sets

forth the duties of county auditors in regard to county

purchasing in the following language:

The county auditor shall adver-

&e'for a period of two weeks in at

least one daily newspaper, published

and circulated in the county, for such

supplies and material according to

specifications, giving in detail what is

needed. Such advertisements shall

state where the specifications are to

be found, and shall give the tiimeand

place for receiving such bids. All

such competitive bids shall be kept on

file by the county auditor as a part

of the records of his office, and shall

be subject to inspection by any one

Honorable Joseph C. Ternus, page 3 (WW-1121)

desiring to see them. Copies of all

bids received shall be furnished by

the county auditor to the county judge

and to the commissioners court; and

when the bids received are not satis-

factory to the said judge or county

commissioners, the auditor shall reject

said bids and re-advertise for new bids."

This language charges the Cou::tyAuditor with

the following duties in connection with the purchasing

function:

1. Advertising for bids, indicating

therein the time and place for

receiving bids.

2. Keeping on file all bids received.

3. Furnishing copies of all bids received

to the county judge and commissioners

court.

4. Readvertising for bids when those

received in the first instance are

deemed unacceptable by the county

judge or commissioners court.

In addition to these duties, Article 1661,

Vernon's Civil Statutes, requires the County Auditor to

file a copy of all purchase requisitions.

"3. Included among the various

operations connected with the

purchasing function not enumera-

ted above as being the duty of

the County Auditor are the

following:

a. Responsibility for making

decisions.

b. Prepare and explain speci-

fications.

Get out invitations to bid.

:: Decide who to send invita-

tions to bid to.

e. Work out problems concern-

ing bids and merchandise

with salesmen and bidders.

f. Issue purchase requisitions

to party from whom purchase

is to be made.

Honorable Joseph C. Ternus, page 4 (WW-1121)

62. Receive merchandise, and

open and check same against

purchase requisitions.

h. Distribute merchandise.

I. Store merchandise if

necessary.

"You are requested to define who

is responsible for performing the

above items of work connected with

the parchasing function,,forSan

Patricia County, Texas.

(a) While without question the County Auditor

bears the responsibility for making some decisions, we are

not apprised of the nature of the decisions contemplated

by your inquiry.

(b) Preparation and explanation of specifi-

cations is inferentially the duty of the Commissioners

court. Attorney General's Opinion No. O-6606 (1945).

(c,d) Article 1659, supra, requires that

bids be invited by newspaper advertisement. Inviting

bids by means of circular letters is not authorized, and

the County Auditor consequently has no duties in that

regard.

(e) We find no authority imposing upon

County Auditors the duty to negotiate in any manner with

salesmen and bidders.

(f) Article 1661, Vernon's Civil Statutes,

directs that requisitions be approved by the County Judge

'beforethey are submitted to the County Auditor for

his approval. Since requisitions do not originate with

the County Auditor, we find no implication that he has

a duty to supply or issue requisitions forms. Certainly

there is no express authority to that effect.

(g,h,i) Responsibility for receiving, checking,

distributing, and storing merchandise does not rest with

the County Auditor. His office is essentially that of

a fiscal guardian, not that of a storekeeper.

SUMMARY

The County Auditor of San Patricia

County is not the purchasing agent

for that county. His duties in

r

Honorable Joseph C. Ternus, page 5 (WW-1121)

respect to county purchases are

limited to advertising for bids,

re-advertising when necessary,

filing copies of bids and supply-

ing copies to the County Judge

and Commissioners Court, and

approving and filing copies of all

purchase requisitions.

Yours very truly,

WILL WILSON

Attorney General of Texas

GH:lgh

Assistant

APPROVED:

OPINION COMMITTEE

W. V. Geppert, Chairman

Charles Lind

Glenn Brown

Gordon C. Cass

REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

BY: Howard W. Mays

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.