Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1969
Status
Published
On the bench
Crawford Martin
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 3.5%

The opinion

June 18, 1969

Honorable Graves Landrum Opinion No. M-420

Vice-Chancellor for Administration

The University of Texas System Re: Whether rights of an em-

Austin, Texas ployee, participating in

the Optional Retirement

Act, vest after one year's

participation in the

Optional. Retirement'Pro-

Dear Mr. Landrum: gram, and related questions.

You have requested that this office answer the following

questions:

"1. Do rlghts~ of the employee particl-

patlng in the Optional Retirement Act vest

after one year's participation in the Optional

EEtFement Program?

"2. If answer ,to question 1 is yes, then

do the rights of the employee vest on his first

day of employment after one year's participation

in the O.R.P.?

"3. Is it mandatory that the participation

requirements in the 0.R.P'. be completed at one

institution, or may the participation require-

ments be completed 'In more than one state-supported

institution of higher education, including junior

colleges, to insure vesting after dne year of

participation?

“4. Does the employee have a vested in-

terest after one year's participation even

though the participation might be with more

than one instiance company?

Article 2922-11, Vernon's Civil Statutes, provides for

the Optional Retirement Program for. teachers and administrative

-2099-

..

Ron. Craves Landrum, page 2 (~-420,

personnel employed by state-supported institutions of higher

education and reads, In part, as follows:

“Section 1. The Legislature finds that

higher education Is vitally important to the

welfare, If not the survival, of Texas and

the United States at this stage. In history

and that the quality of higher education Is

dependent upon the quality of college and

unlverelty faculties. The Legislature finds,

therefore, that moneys spent on recognized

means for producing an excellent system of

public higher education Is money spent to

serve a public purpose of great importance.

The Legislature finds further that a sound

faculty retirement program that provides

full and complete retirement benefits to

teachers and administrators who have given

faithful service to state -supported lnstltu-

tlons of higher education Is a well-recognized

means for Improving a state’s program of pub-

lic higher education. The Legislature’s pur-

pose in establlshlng the retirement program

provided for by this Act Is to improve further

the higher education available to the youth at

the state-suonorted ‘colleges and universities

and to estabiish this retirement program as

part of the plan of compensation for the faculty

of these colleges and universities.

“Sec. 2. As used in this Act, unless the

context otherwise requires:

,I

. . .

“(c) ‘Institution of higher education’

means an lnstltutlon of higher education as

defined under the provisions of Chapter 12, Acts,

Regular Session, 59th Legislature (1965), and

lncludlng James Connally Technical Institute,

except the Rodent and Predatory Animal Control

Service.

“(d) ‘Faculty member’ means a person em-

ployed by an institution of higher education

on a full time basls as a member of the faculty

or staff and whose duties Include teaching,

-.2100 -

Hon. Graves Landrum, page 3 (~.420~

research, administration, Including profes-

sional librarians, or the performance of pro-

fessional services but does not mean a person

employed in a position which Is In the lnstltu-

tlon’s classified personnel system or a person

employed In a similar type of position if the

Institution does not have a classified personnel

system.

“(e) ‘Governing Board ’ means the body

charged with policy direction of any institution

of higher education.

“(f) ‘Optional Retirement Program’ means

the optional retirement program created by this

Act to provide fixed or variable retirement an-

nuities, Including retirement unit annuity

certificates of participation for faculty

members.

“Sec. 3(a) There Is hereby established

an Optional Retirement Program. Participation

in the Optional Retirement Program Is In lieu

of active membership in the Retirement System,

The Qoverning Boards for all Institutions of

higher education shall make available to all

faculty members In their component Institution’s,

agencies and units the Optional Retirement Pro-

“(b) All faculty members are eligible to

participate in the Optional Retirement Program,

subject to such rules as may be prescribed by

the Qoverning Board of the institution of higher

education at which they are employed.

“Sec. 4. In administering the Optional Re-

tirement Program a Qovernlng Board may provide

for the purchase of annuity contracts from any

insurance or annuity company o.uallfled and admitted

to do business in this state. Any life Insurance or

annuity company qualified and admitted to do

business In this state shall be exempt from the

payment of al: franchise or premium taxes as to

all annuity or group Insurance contracts made

pursuant to a benefit program authorized by the

governing board of an Institution of higher ed-

ucation, or by any private non-profit educational

- 2101-

Hon. Graves Landrum, page 4 (M-420)

Institution of higher learning, which benefit

program is paid for in whole or in part from

the funds of such institution. Where a Governing

Board has more than one component Institution,

agency or unit under Its jurisdiction, it may

provide a separate Optional Retirement Program

for each component Institution, agency or unit

or place two or mbre component institutions,

agencies or units under a single program.

n

* . . ” (Emphasis added. )

The answers to your first two questions are found In

the provisions set out In Section 3(a) of Article 2922-11, as

above quoted. The glaln and unambiguous language of this sec-

tion sets out that the Optional Retirement Program shall ro-

vlde for vesting of benefits after one year of parti&

We therefore hold that your first question Is answered 1 th e

affirmative. Accord, Attorney Genera’l’s Opinion No. ~-1G6

(1968).

Article 23, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, defines year to

mean a calendar year. It 1s well established both at common

law and by statute, that, unless otherwise expressed the word

“year” when used is a contract, judicial proceeding or statute,

or constitution, ordinarily 1s understood to mean a calendar

year, regardless of whether It be leap year or otherwlse.’

Douglas v. Acacia Mu 118 S.W.2d 643 (Tex.

Civ.App. 1938, error r v. National Life and

Accident Ins. Co., 63 ex.Clv.App. 1933 , error

ref.) th e Court set means “at the end of”

“as soon as” and In computation of time the word “after”

&erally understod In the sense of excluding the day or date

mentioned, Words In a statute must be given their enerally

accepted meaning. Calvert v. Audio Center Inc., 34% S.W.2d

420 (Tex.Clv.App. 1961 , error ref. n.r.e.). Applying the above

stated definitions to the words “vesting after one year of par-

tlclpatlon”, we hold that the rights of an employee vest on ~hls

first day of employment, after one year’s participation in the

Optional Retlrement Program, and your second question is answered

In the affirmative.

To arrive at the Intention of the Legislature In regard

to your third question we must look at the full Act. Having the

power to set up the Optional Retirement Frcgram, the Legislature

had the power to spell out Its requirezer,ts. This it has done

by delegating the duty to the governing board of each institution

--2102 -

Hon. Graves LandNm, page 5 (M- 420)

of higher education to make an Optlonal Retirement Program

available for the faculty of its institution. Section 3

specifically gives the governing board of each lnstltutlon

of higher education the authority to make the rules governing

the program for that lnstltutlon, and to provide in those

rules that there be a vesting of benefits after one year of

participation. Section 4 provides that the governing board

may provide for the purchase of annuity contracts from any

Insurance or annuity company qualified and admitted to do

business in Texas. The act clearly sets out, In all of Its

provisions and requirements, the duty and responsibility for

the Optional Retirement Program to be with the governing board

of each institution of higher education.

We therefore hold that It is mandatory that the faculty

member must have participated in the Optional Retirement Program

at one Institution of higher education for at least one calendar

year to be eligible for vesting of benefit rights under the Op-

tional Retirement Program.

Where the governing board of a system composed of more

than one component institution, such as the University of Texas

system, has adopted a program placing all Institutions within

the system under one program, It Is our opinion that an employee

may meet the one year vestlng.requlrement by participating in

such program In any one or more Institutions within the system

within the same calendar year.

For purposes of anawerlng your fourth question we

have searched the statute for provisions providing for the

vesting of benefit rights by participating ln more than one

Insurance program. Section 4 provides that the governing board

may have a program with more than one Insurance company for its

faculty members. Therefore, It 1s our opinion that an employee

may have a vested Interest after one year's participation In

the program of that lnstltutlon even though It may be with more

.,than one Insurance company that was approved by the governing

board of that Institution.

SUUMARY

Article 2922-11, V.C.S., requires that

Optional Retirement Programs provide for

vesting of benefit rights after one year of

participation in the program by an emplcyee.

Said vesting Is to be effective on his first

day of employment after one year’s participation

- 2103-

Hon. Graves Landrum, page 6 (~-420~

In the program prescribed by the governing board

of the inetitution. It Is mandatory that the

partlclpatlon requirements be completed at one

Institution. Where the governing board of a

system composed of more than one component

Institution, such as the University of Texas

system, has adopted a program placing all ln-

stltutlons within the system under one program,

It Is our opinion that an employee may meet

the one year vesting requirement by participating

In such program In any one or more lnst%tutlons

within the system within the same calendar year.

The participation may be with more than one ap-

proved Insurance company.

General of Texas

Prepared by William J. Craig

Assistant Attorney General

APPROVED:

OPINION'COMMITTEE

Kerns Taylor, Chairman

George Kelton, Vice-Chairman

Joseph Sharpleg

Sam McDaniel

Houghton Brownlee

Jlm Swearingen

W. V. Geppert

Staff Legal Assistant

Hawthorne Phillips

Executive Assistant

- 2104-

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.