Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1970
Status
Published
On the bench
Crawford Martin
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

January 29, 1970

Dr. Nelson F. Waldman, Chairman Opinion No. M-565

Texas Optometry,Board

710 Fannin Street Re: Authority of Texas Optometry

Houston, Texas 77002 Board to pay its executive

secretary actual travel ex-

penses when attending Board

meetings or in the perfor-

mance of actual duties away

Dear Dr. Waldman: from home office.

Your request for an opinion asks the following question:

“Our question Is whether or not the Texas

Optometry Board has the authority, based on

the fact situation above presented, to pay to

Its general office manager actual travel ex-

penses when such Individual is attending Beard

meeting or is on Board business, in the per-

formance of her actual duties, or whether

such expense reimbursement must be based on

the prevailing State per diem.”

The Individual involved Is designated in the Appro-

priation Act ftndcarried on the paxroll of the Texas Optometry

Board as its Executive Secretary. The facts concerning the

Individual involved are set out in your request as follows:

I!

e D . She serves as our general office

manager ; she is the finance officer for the

Board, being charged with the responsibility

of the Initial preparation of the budget and

the handling of all finances through the

Board ‘a office; she Is responsible for cor-

respondence addressed to the Board and seeing

that correspondence Is either properly answered

or channeled to the appropriate Board member

in their respective capacities as committee

chairmen, for proper answer.

-2701-

Dr. Nelson F. Waldman, page 2(M-565)

"More vitally important to the instant

question, however, is our absolute need to

have her in attendance at each of our Board

meetings, some of whlct.are held outside of

Austin for various reasons, not the least of

which is that the giving of examinations by the

Board must necessitate the utilization of the

facilities of the college of Optometry at the

University of Houston, in Houston, Harris County,

Texas. Her attendance at these Board meetings

and examination meetings is imperative. Her

responsibility, in addition to the above

mentioned, Include the preparation of the agenda

for the Board, briefing the Board on current

problems which have come Into the Board's of-

fice In Austin during the interim, and apprising

the Board of the day to day operations over

which she has the initial authority. Not only

does she take the minutes of the Board meeting,

but her tasks include making all necessary ar

rangements and preparations for the examinations

of applicants, and Indeed, the multitude of

tasks necessary to assist the Board in the

giving of examinations to such applicants.

'There is sufficient money in the Board'8

approprfated funds for the payment of aztual

travel expenses to this Board employee.

The appropriation to the Optometry Board contained in

House Bill 2 (Acts of the 61st Legislature, 2nd C.S., 1969) for

the biennium ending August 31, 1971, appropriates money for the

compensation of Board members, Executive Secretary and investigator.

Items 5 and 6 read as follows:

'For the Years Ending

August 31, August 31,

1970 1971

"50 Travel, Board Members $ 6,000 $ 6,000

"6. Travel, Executive Sec-

retary and Investigator 4,000 4,000"

Section 14 of Article V of House Bill 2 prescribes the

travel expenses authorized for State employees. Section 1.6 re-

scrfbes an exception to the allowance rates. Subdivision (aP of

Section 16 reads as follows:

-2702-

Dr. Nelson F. Waldman, page 3 (M-565)

"a. Judicial officers authorized by law

and executive heads of State agencies, lnclud-

ing the Executive Director of the Legislative

Council, shall be reimbursed for their actual

meals, lodging and incidental expenses (ex-

clusive of expenses related to automobiles'

for which transportation allowance is paid as

provided by Section 14a. of this Article)

when traveling on official business either

In or out of the State."

'Executive heads of state agencies" as used In Section

16a, quoted above, is the same as "heads of state agencies”, as

defined in Section 2 of Article 6823a, Vernon's Civil Statutes.

See Attorney General's Opinions C-510 (1965) and C-477 (1965).

Section 2 of Article 6823a reads as follows:

"Sec. 2. The provisions of this Act shall

apply to all officers, heads of state agencies,

and state employees. Heads of state agencies

shall mean elected state officials, excluding

members of the Legislature who shall receive

travel reimbursement as provided by the Consti-

tution, appointed state officials, appointed

state officials whose appointment Is subject

to Senate confirmation, directors of legls-

lative interim committees or boards, heads of

state hospitals and special schools, and hEads

of state institutions of higher education.

Under the facts submitted, it Is our opinion that the

Executive Secretary of the Optometry Board is not the executive

head of the Texas Optometry Board and does not therefore fall

within the exception of Section 16 above quoted. You are there-

fore advised that the Executfve Secretary of the Texas Optometry

Board is to be paid travel expenses fn accordance with the rates

of allowance contained in Section 14 of Article V of House Bill

2 (Acts of the 61st Legfslature, 2nd C.S., 1969), since such

employee is not the executive head of the Texas Optometry Board

and does not therefore fall withfn the exception contained in

Section 16 of House Bill 2,

SUMMARY

The Executive Secretary of the Texas

Optometry Board, being an employee of the Texas

Optometry Board, is to be paid travel expenses

In accordance with the rates of allowance con-

tained in Section 14 of Artfcle V of House

-2703-

Dr. Nelson F. Waldman, page 4 (M-565)

Bill 2, Acts of the 61st Legislature, 2nd

C.S., 1969 (current General Approprlatlon

Act), since such employee is not the ex-

ecutive head of the Texas Optometry Board

and does not therefore fall within the ex-

ception contained In Section 16 of House

Bill 2.

General of Texas

Prepared by John Reeves

Assistant Attorney General

APPROVED:

OPINION COMMITTEE

Kerns Taylor, Chairman

Alfred Walker, Co-Chairman

Robert Davis

Bennie Bock

Ed Esqulvel

Llnward Shivers

EEADE F. GRIFFIN

Staff Legal Assistant

NOLA WHITE

First Assistant

-2704-

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.