Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1984
Status
Published
On the bench
Jim Mattox
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 3.5%

The opinion

The Attorney General of Texas

JIM MATTOX

June 21, 1984

Attorney General

Supreme Court Building Honorable Romeo Flares Opinion No. JM-174

P. 0. BOX 12546

Austin, TX. 76711. 2546

County Attorney

5121475.2501 Jim Wells County Courthouse Re: Whether a justice precinct

Telex 910/674-1367 200 North Almond which contains a city of 8.000

Telecopier 51214750266 P. 0. Drawer 2080 or more must elect two justices

Alice, Texas 78333 of the peace

714 Jackson, suite 700

Dallas, TX. 75202.4506 Dear Mr. Flores:

2141742.6944

You have requested our opinion regarding the effect of article

2375, V.T.C.S., which provides:

4624 Alberta Ave., Suite 160

El Paso, TX. 79905.2793

915/533-3464 Where there is a city of eight thousand

inhabitants or more in a justice precinct, two

justices of the peace shall be elected.

-1 Texas, Suite 700

Mon. TX. 77002-3111

You have asked whether this provision is mandatory.

7131223.5666

The determination of the number of justice precincts in a county

606 Broadway, Suite 312 is made pursuant to article V, section 18 of the Texas Constitution as

Lubbock. TX. 79401-3479 amended in 1983. Obviously. this constitutional nrovision sunersedes

6061747-5236

any contrary statutory pr&i.sions. Section 18 provides in pertinent

part as follows:

4309 N. Tenth, Suite B

McAllen, TX. 76501-1665 Each county in the State with a population of

5121662.4547

30,000 or more, according to the most recent

federal census, from time to time, for the

200 Main Plaza, Suite 400 convenience of the people, shall be divided into

San Antonio, TX. 76205-2797 not less than four and not more than eight

51212254191 precincts. Each county in the State with a

population of 18,000 or more but less than 30,000,

An Equal Opportunity/

according to the most recent federal census, from

Affirmative Action Employer time to time, for the convenience of the people,

shall be divided into not less than two and not

more than five precincts. Each county in the

State with a population of less than 18,000,

according to the most recent federal census, from

time to time, for the convenience of the people,

shall be designated as a single precinct or, if

the Commissioners Court determines that the county

needs more than one precinct, shall be divided

into not more than four precincts. The division

or designation shall be made by the Commissioners

p. 765

Honorable Romeo Flores - Page 2 (JM-174)

Court provided for by this Constitution. In each

such precinct there shall be elected one Justice

of the Peace and one Constable, each of whom shall

hold his office for four years and until his

successor shall be elected and qualified; provided

that in any precinct in which there may be a city

of 18,000 or more inhabitants, there shall be

elected two Justices of the Peace. (Emphasis

added).

The 1980 census population of Jim Wells County is 36,498. The

underlined portion of section 18 above had, before the amendment,

provided for two justices of the peace in any precinct containing a

city of 8,000 or more. Article 2375, V.T.C.S., wss not amended by the

legislature in 1983 and to the extent that it requires a different

number of justice precincts than that required by the Texas

Constitution, it is invalid. We believe that your question becomes,

therefore, whether the constitution requires or only permits the

election of two justices of the peace, place one and plsce two, in a

precinct containing a city of 18,000 population.

The Texas Supreme Court in Williams v. Castleman, 247 S.W. 263

(Tex. 1922), held that under article V, section 18, the commissioners

court had discretion to determine and enter a finding that a city

contained a population of more than 8,000. In that case the

commissioners court had consulted the city postmaster and the local

chamber of commerce to determine the population of the city' of

Breckenridge. and it found that the city had a population of more than

8,000 and thereupon created a justice of the peace place two in that

precinct. This finding of a city's population or the failure to do so

is subject to a charge of abuse of discretion, fraud, or

arbitrariness. The commissioners court is not limited to the federal

census in determining the population of a city for the purposes of

article V, section 18. In the absence of fraud, abuse of discretion,

or capriciousness, a commissioners court finding whether a city

contains a population of 8,000 or more cannot be attacked. The court

held that the complaining party in the case, the justice of the peace

place one, did not show that the commissioners court finding that the

city of Breckenridge contained the population of more than 8,000 was

an abuse of discretion and that he was therefore not entitled to

relief.

The implication of the Williams case is that, if a city within a

justice precinct clearly contains a population of more than 8,000 (now

18,000) it would be an abuse of discretion for the commissioners court

to find otherwise. In this sense, the provision of article 18

requiring two justices of the peace in a precinct containing such a

city is mandatory, although the operative facts -- that is the

population of the city -- is a matter for determination by the

commissioners court. We believe that the language of section 18 is

p. 766

Honorable Romeo Flores - Page 3 (JM-174)

clear that there "shall" be elected two justices of the peace in a

precinct containing a city of more than 18,000 population.

Opinions from this office and Texas courts, however, have

confused the issue as to whether or not section 18 is mandatory.

Attorney General Opinion O-2847 (1940) concluded that section 18 was

mandatory. That opinion reflects that the 1940 federal census

population of the city of Lufkin, located within a justice of the

peace precinct, was 9,500 inhabitants. The opinion stated that the

commissioners court is not bound by the federal census in determining

the population of a city and may find that the population has

decreased since the last census. The appeals court in Grant v.

Ammerman. 451 S.W.2d 777 (Tex. Civ. App. - Texarkana 1970, writ ref'd

n.r.e.), also held that section 18 was mandatory as to the appointment

of a second justice. The court held that the commissioners court did

not have the authority to abolish one of the two justice positions in

a justice of the peace precinct containing the city of Marshall, which

had a population of over 8,000. The opinion did not discuss the

Williams case nor did it conclude that the commissioners court had

abused its discretion. It simply held that the word "shall" is

mandatory and requires two justices of the peace to be elected in a

precinct containing a city of 8.000 inhabitants. We believe,

nevertheless, that this case was correctly decided.

The appeals court in Meredith v. Sharp, 256 S.W.2d 870 (Tex. Civ.

APP. - Texarkana), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curia*, 259 S.W.2d 172 (Tex.

1953). held that the provisions of section 18 regarding two justices

of the peace in a precinct containing a city of 8,000 was not

mandatory, but rather that it was within the discretion of the

commissioners court to allow two justices of the peace to be elected

in a single precinct if "for the convenience of the people." We

believe that this decision was in error and, in any event, the supreme

court in refusing a writ of error stated that the case should have

been dismissed by the trial court. &, 259 S.W.2d 172 (Tex. 1953).

The appeals court in Meredith apparently was confused by the language

in section 18 which provides that the number of justice of the peace

precincts and their boundaries are to be determined by the

commissioners court "for the convenience of the people" upon a

relevant finding of population -- a finding involving some discretion.

We believe that this phrase is not applicable to the requirement that

two justices of the peace be elected in a precinct containing a city

of, now, 18,000, because the population has been determined and there

is no longer any discretion to be exercised. In that pre-1983 case a

taxpayer of Gregg County sued the commissioners court to compel it to

create a place two for a justice of the peace precinct containing the

city of Longview which without dispute contained more than 8,000

inhabitants.

The Meredith court found that the creation of an additional

justice of the peace position was a discretionary act on the part of

the commissioners court which was permitted if found to be for the

p. 767

Honorable Romeo Flores - Page 4 (JM-174)

convenience of the people. The opinion relied on the Williams v.

Castleman case for the proposition that the commissioners court has

discretion in establishing justice of the peace precincts and their

lines. We believe, as we indicated before, that this proposition was

based on a misreading of Williams because the discretion discussed in

the Williams case pertained to the finding that a city has the

requisite population. Attorney General Opinion WW-1251 (1962)

followed the Meredith case and concluded that the Gray County

Commissioners Court could abolish one of the two justice of the peace

positions in a precinct containing~the city of Pampa with a population

of more than 24,000. This opinion was wrongly decided and is hereby

overruled.

Attorney General Opinion C-566 (1965) concerned the election to

justice of the peace precinct one, place two in Hale County, which

wholly contained the city of Plainview, with a population of more than

18,000 under the federal census. The commissioners court of Hale

County had never entered an order declaring the population of

Plainview to be more than 8,000 in creating a place two position. The

attorney general found that, unless and until the cotmaissionerscourt

declares a city to be over 8,000 (now 18,000 population) and orders

the creation of a place two position, candidates may not file for such

a non-existent office. This opinion is correct to the extent that it

requires some action on the part of the commissioners court before a

place two position is created. To the extent, however, that the

opinion held that the place two position must be determined by the

commissioners court to be "for the convenience of the people," it is

overruled. As we have stated above, the only discretion that a

commissioners court has is in determining the population of a city.

Once that population is determined to be in excess of 18,000

population, it does not have discretion to find that the convenience

of the people does not require a place two position.

SUMMARY

Article V, section 18 of the Texas Constitution

requires the election of two justices of the peace

in a precinct if it is determined by the

commissioners court that the precinct contains a

city of more than 18,000 inhabitants.

Attorney General of Texas

TOM GREEN

First Assistant Attorney General

p. 768

Honorable Romeo Flores - Page 5 (JM-174)

P

DAVID R. RICHARDS

Executive Assistant Attorney General

Prepared by David Brooks

Assistant Attorney General

APPROVED:

OPINION COMMITTEE

Rick Gilpin, Chairman

David Brooks

Colin Carl

Susan Garrison

Jim Moellinger

Nancy Sutton

p. 769

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.