The opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE
Assigned on Briefs October 4, 2016
BRYAN R. HANLEY v. TURNEY CENTER DISCIPLINARY BOARD,
ET AL.
Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hickman County
No. 15-CV-5637 Joseph Woodruff, Chancellor
___________________________________
No. M2016-01223-COA-R3-CV – Filed November 30, 2016
___________________________________
RICHARD H. DINKINS, J., dissenting.
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding. As the majority notes, a charge
against an inmate be proven by a preponderance of the evidence, defined at TDOC Policy
No. 502.01(IV)(I) as “[t]he degree of proof which best accords with reason and
probability and is more probable than not.” As the majority also notes, the evidence upon
which Mr. Hanley’s conviction rested consisted of the two knives and Corporal Story’s
statement, the salient portion of which is quoted in the majority opinion. Corporal Story
did not testify and the only live witnesses were Mr. Hanley, who denied that the knives
were his, and Duane Brooks, an inmate who testified in support of Mr. Hanley’s
contention that the knives were left by a previous occupant of the cell.
Because I believe that the proof falls short of the standard mandated by the TDOC
policy, I would grant Mr. Hanley relief.
_________________________________
RICHARD H. DINKINS, JUDGE