Opinion

Jay Cohen v. Tour Partners, LTD., Dennis J. Wilkerson, and Eighteen Investments, Inc.

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Dec 8, 2015
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

ACCEPTED

01-15-00705-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

12/8/2015 2:09:36 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

No. 01-15-00705-CV

In the Court of Appeals FILED IN

1st COURT OF APPEALS

For the First Judicial District of Texas HOUSTON, TEXAS

Houston, Texas 12/8/2015 2:09:36 PM

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

Clerk

Jay H. Cohen,

Appellant

v.

Tour Partners, Ltd.; Dennis J. Wilkerson; and Eighteen Investments, Inc.,

Appellees

On Appeal from Cause No. 2013-68181

In The 55th District Court of Harris County, Texas

The Honorable Judge Shadwick, Presiding

Appellees’ Response to Appellant’s Motion for Extension

Hawash Meade Gaston

Neese & Cicack LLP

Walter J. Cicack

Texas Bar No. 04250535

Samuel B. Haren

Texas Bar No. 24059899

2118 Smith Street

Houston, Texas 77002

713-658-9001 (phone)

713-658-9011 (fax)

wcicack@hmgnc.com

sharen@hmgnc.com

Attorneys for Appellees

and Cross Appellant

Appellant Jay H. Cohen’s opening brief was due on November 13, 2015. He

did not file one until December 8, 2015. His excuses for his tardiness are vague and

self-contradictory, and the Court should not permit him to file his late brief.

Background

Cohen and Cross-Appellee Tour Partners, Ltd. (“Tour Partners”) were

involved in related lawsuits before the 55th and 269th District Courts of Harris

County, Texas (the “55th Case” and “269th Case,” respectively). The 55th Case led

to the instant appeal. Cohen’s appeal of the 269th Case was docketed in the

Fourteenth Court of Appeals as Cause Number 14-15-00392-CV. Cohen requested

and received three extensions of his briefing deadline, but he never filed his opening

brief—or even a fourth request for extension—in that appeal. See Exhibit 1, 14th

Court Motion to Dismiss (detailing Cohen’s history of extensions). The Fourteenth

Court dismissed Cohen’s appeal of the 269th Case on November 10, 2015. See

Exhibit 2, 14th Court Memorandum Opinion.

Cohen’s opening brief was due in the instant appeal on November 13, 2015.

Cohen did not meet that deadline. Tour Partners filed a Motion to Dismiss on

November 23, 2015, which is incorporated herein. On November 24, 2015, the Court

issued a Notice of Late Brief which warned Cohen that his appeal could be dismissed

unless he filed a brief and motion for extension by December 4, 2015. That notice

further stated that an untimely brief would only be accepted if Cohen could

“reasonably explain [his] failure to timely file [his] brief” and if Tour Partners “is

not significantly injured” by Cohen’s failure to comply with his briefing deadline.

Cohen missed that deadline as well.

On December 8, 2015, Cohen filed his brief and motion for extension (the

“Motion”). But his Motion does not offer a reasonable explanation for his failure to

meet his briefing deadline.

Discussion

I. Cohen’s explanations for his untimely brief are vague and contradictory.

According to Cohen, he should be excused from his briefing deadline because

(1) he was too sick to file a timely motion for extension and (2) he has been too busy

to timely file a motion for extension. That is, Cohen says he was unable to draft a

two-page motion for extension despite having the time and ability to try a case,

prepare for three other trials, attend two mediations, participate in a tax protest

hearing, prepare for and conduct an involved shareholder meeting, respond to

discovery, and perform “[v]arious other time-sensitive matters for clients.” See

Motion at 3–4. Apparently, filing a motion to extend a briefing deadline in this Court

was not one of those a “time-sensitive matters” Cohen’s attorney—or his partner—

chose to perform.

Cohen’s Motion does not list all of the relevant “other matters” on which his

attorney worked. For example, Cohen’s counsel was not so ill as to prevent him from

2

filing a motion to extend in his case against Tour Partners in the Fourteenth Court

on September 9, 2015, nor was he too busy to file a new lawsuit on behalf of Cohen

on October 22, 2015. See Exhibit 3, Third Motion for Extension; Exhibit 4, Cohen’s

District Court Petition. Moreover, Cohen’s attorney further fails to explain how his

illness and family matters prevented him from filing a timely motion for extension

or contacting Tour Partners regarding his predicament but did not prevent him from

completing the tasks described in his Motion as well as the “[v]arious other time-

sensitive matters for clients.” In short, Cohen has failed to provide a “reasonable

explanation” for his delay.

II. Tour Partners would be injured if Court accepts Cohen’s untimely brief.

Tour Partners has filed a cross appeal in this case.1 That appeal would provide

an alternative basis to uphold the trial court’s ruling in the event Cohen would

otherwise succeed in the instant appeal. If Cohen does not succeed in his appeal,

Tour Partner’s cross appeal will be moot. Because Cohen’s other appeal was

dismissed by the Fourteenth Court, Tour Partners asked Cohen on November 16,

2015 whether he intended to file a brief in this appeal. See Exhibit 8,

1

Tour Partners won both the 55th and 269th Cases on summary judgment. See Exhibit 5, 269th

Summary Judgment Order; Exhibit 6, 55th First Summary Judgment Order. After the 269th Court

issued a final judgment, Tour Partners filed a supplemental motion for summary judgment in the

55th Case based on res judicata. Because Tour Partners had already defeated Cohen’s claims, the

55th Court denied that supplemental motion as moot. See Exhibit 7, 55th Second Summary

Judgment Order.

3

Correspondence. Cohen did not respond to that email, nor did he (1) explain his

difficulties in filing a brief nor (2) ask Tour Partners to agree to an extension.2 Had

he done so in a timely manner, Tour Partners would have certainly considered

agreeing to an extension based on the health of Cohen’s attorney. Tour Partners

agreed to Cohen’s first request for an extension in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals,

demonstrating its reasonableness in these matters. See Exhibit 9, Cohen’s First

Motion for Extension.

Due to the Fourteenth Court’s dismissal of Cohen’s other appeal and Cohen’s

lack of any indication that he intended to file a brief or seek an extension in this

appeal, Tour Partners correctly surmised that Cohen did not intend to file a timely

brief in this case. As a result, Tour Partners did not undertake the time and expense

of drafting an unnecessary brief. If Cohen is allowed to file his untimely brief, Tour

Partners will not be able to present its cross appeal unless the Court grants it leave

to do so.

Conclusion

Cohen did not file his brief or Motion until well after the deadline. As detailed

in Tour Partners’ previously-filed Motion to Dismiss, Cohen is a serial-offender in

this regard. Cohen has not provided a cogent or reasonable explanation for his

2

Cohen’s certificate of conference notwithstanding, he has not communicated with Tour Partners

at all regarding his briefing in this case, let alone conferred on his request for an extension of his

briefing deadline.

4

failure, and allowing Cohen to file an untimely brief would harm Tour Partners. Tour

Partners prays that the Court dismiss Cohen’s appeal, issue a final judgment, and

grant Tour Partners all other relief to which it is entitled.

In the event the Court accepts Cohen’s untimely brief, Tour Partners asks for

fourteen (14) days to file its opening brief on its cross appeal.

Respectfully submitted,

Hawash Meade Gaston

Neese & Cicack LLP

/s/ Walter J. Cicack

Walter J. Cicack

Texas Bar No. 04250535

Samuel B. Haren

Texas Bar No. 24059899

2118 Smith Street

Houston, Texas 77002

713-658-9001 (phone)

713-658-9011 (fax)

wcicack@hmgnc.com

sharen@hmgnc.com

Attorneys for Appellees and

Cross-Appellant

5

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on

the following via Electronic Service, on December 8, 2015:

George F. May

Twomey | May, PLLC

2 Riverway, 15th Floor

Houston, Texas 77056

george@twomeymay.com

Attorney for Appellant

Jay H. Cohen

/s/ Samuel B. Haren

Samuel B. Haren

6

ACCEPTED

14-15-00392-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

10/19/2015 2:51:00 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

No. 14-15-00392-CV

In the Court of Appeals

For the Fourteenth Judicial District of Texas

Houston, Texas

Jay H. Cohen,

Appellant

v.

Tour Partners, Ltd.,

Appellee

On Appeal from Cause No. 2013-41051

In The 269th District Court of Harris County, Texas

The Honorable Judge Hinde, Presiding

Tour Partners’ Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution

Hawash Meade Gaston

Neese & Cicack LLP

Walter J. Cicack

Texas Bar No. 04250535

Samuel B. Haren

Texas Bar No. 24032854

2118 Smith Street

Houston, Texas 77002

713-658-9001 (phone)

713-658-9011 (fax)

wcicack@hmgnc.com

sharen@hmgnc.com

Attorneys for Appellee

Tour Partners, Ltd.

Exhibit 1

Appellant Jay H. Cohen (“Cohen”) has received three extensions of his

briefing deadline. Despite these extensions, Cohen still has not filed his brief. As

demonstrated below, the Court should dismiss Cohen’s appeal for want of

prosecution.

Background

The initial clerk’s record was filed on June 10. Cohen’s opening brief was

initially due on July 10. Cohen has requested three extensions of his briefing

deadline:

 First Extension: Two days before his initial deadline, Cohen sought a

thirty-one day extension based on his attorney’s busy schedule. Appellee

Tour Partners, Ltd. (“Tour Partners”) did not oppose this request. The

Court granted the thirty-one day extension.

 Second Extension: The day of the second deadline, Cohen sought a thirty-

day extension based on his dissatisfaction with the contents of the Clerk’s

Record. Tour Partners did not oppose this request. The Court granted the

thirty-day extension.

 Third Extension: The day of the third deadline, Cohen sought another

extension based on his dissatisfaction with the Contents of the Clerk’s

Record. Because Cohen’s own inattention to the file caused the lateness of

the Clerk’s Record, Tour Partners opposed this request. The Court

(1) granted a thirty-six day extension and (2) warned that “no further

extensions will be granted absent exceptional circumstances . . . .”

Order Granting Third Motion to Extend (emphasis in original).

Cohen’s final deadline to file his brief was Thursday, October 15. As of the

afternoon of Monday, October 19, Cohen still has not filed his brief.

Discussion

“If an appellant fails to timely file a brief,” Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

38.8(a)(1) allows the Court to “dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless

the appellant reasonably explains the failure . . . .” Despite three extensions, Cohen

has failed to timely file a brief.

According to Cohen, this failure was caused by Cohen’s confusion over the

contents of his own record:

In reviewing the brief as drafted last week, I realized that it had been

drafted assuming that no summary judgment evidence was excluded.

The order granting in part some of your objections had not made it into

the record. I immediately emailed Sam [Haren, attorney for Tour

Partners,] and you to ask permission to include the order as a tab to the

brief, which Sam indicated was not opposed.1 To not mislead the Court,

I then attempted to re-draft the brief to ensure that there was no error as

to the summary judgment evidence admitted, and I also had to address

the exclusions. The re-write was too significant (as you can imagine) to

complete in time. I have redrafted the brief and will be filing it

tomorrow with a motion to extend time to the filing date. Unless you

tell me otherwise, I will assume you are opposed to the extension.

Exhibit 1, Email from May to Cicack at 1 (emphasis added). That is, Cohen failed

to meet his fourth briefing deadline because he once again did not thoroughly

examine the Clerk’s Record until the evening his brief was due.2

1

The request referenced by Cohen was sent at 5:24 p.m. on the October 15 briefing deadline. See

Exhibit 1, Email from May to Cicack at 2. Tour Partners’ counsel agreed to this request. Id.

2

In assessing this inattention, the Court should note that Cohen’s current appellate counsel also

represented him at the time of the evidentiary ruling in question.

2

Prayer

Cohen has had three chances to file his brief on time. Tour Partners

respectfully submits that the Court should not indulge Cohen’s continued lack of

diligence by granting him a strike four. Tour Partners prays that the Court dismiss

Cohen’s appeal for want of prosecution and grant Tour Partners all other relief to

which it is entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

Hawash Meade Gaston

Neese & Cicack LLP

/s/ Walter J. Cicack

Walter J. Cicack

Texas Bar No. 04250535

Samuel B. Haren

Texas Bar No. 24032854

2118 Smith Street

Houston, Texas 77002

713-658-9001 (phone)

713-658-9011 (fax)

wcicack@hmgnc.com

sharen@hmgnc.com

Attorneys for Appellee

Tour Partners, Ltd.

3

Certificate of Conference

I hereby certify that I have conferred with opposing counsel concerning the

relief requested herein. Opposing counsel is opposed.

/s/ Samuel B. Haren

Samuel B. Haren

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on

the following via Electronic Service, on October 19, 2015:

George F. May

Twomey | May, PLLC

2 Riverway, 15th Floor

Houston, Texas 77056

george@twomeymay.com

Attorney for Appellant

Jay H. Cohen

/s/ Samuel B. Haren

Samuel B. Haren

4

From: George May <george@twomeymay.com>

Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 12:32 PM

To: Walter Cicack; Sam Haren

Subject: RE: Cohen v. Preston, Tour Partners

Walter,

I am preparing for a shareholders' meeting for a corporate client today.

In reviewing the brief as drafted last week, I realized that it had been drafted assuming that no summary judgment

evidence was excluded. The order granting in part some of your objections had not made it into the record. I immediately

emailed Sam and you to ask permission to include the order as a tab to the brief, which Sam indicated was not opposed.

To not mislead the Court, I then attempted to re-draft the brief to ensure that there was no error as to the summary

judgment evidence admitted, and I also had to address the exclusions. The re-write was too significant (as you can

imagine) to complete in time. I have redrafted the brief and will be filing it tomorrow with a motion to extend time to the

filing date. Unless you tell me otherwise, I will assume you are opposed to the extension.

Should you wish to file a motion to dismiss, which I of course would oppose, please note the above for the Court. I am

tied up today but available in the morning tomorrow if you wish to talk.

George F. May, BS, JD

Twomey | May, PLLC

2 Riverway, 15th Floor

Houston, Texas 77056

(713) 659-0000

(832) 201-8485 – Facsimile

george@twomeymay.com

NOTICE: This transmission may be: (1) subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege, (2) an attorney work product, or (3)

strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate

this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message.

Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. This communication does not reflect an

intention by the sender or the sender's client or principal to conduct a transaction or make any agreement by electronic

means. Nothing contained in this message or in any attachment shall satisfy the requirements for a writing, and nothing

contained herein shall constitute a contract or electronic signature under the Electronic Signatures in Global and National

Commerce Act, any version of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act or any other statute governing electronic

transactions.

-----Original Message-----

From: Walter Cicack [mailto:wcicack@hmgnc.com]

Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 11:59 AM

To: George May; Sam Haren

Subject: RE: Cohen v. Preston, Tour Partners

George, I just left you a message. I just want to make sure we did not miss something. If you filed something in the appeal

of the Cohen case I did not get it. Assuming you did not file something, we will file a motion to dismiss and I wanted to see

if you opposed. Please get back to me. Thanks

Walter Cicack

(713) 658-9003 (direct)

-----Original Message-----

From: Walter Cicack

Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 4:35 PM

To: 'George May' <george@twomeymay.com>; Sam Haren <sharen@hmgnc.com>

1

Exhibit 1

Subject: RE: Cohen v. Preston, Tour Partners

George, did you file something? We did not receive anything.

Walter Cicack

(713) 658-9003 (direct)

-----Original Message-----

From: George May [mailto:george@twomeymay.com]

Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 5:24 PM

To: Sam Haren <sharen@hmgnc.com>; Walter Cicack <wcicack@hmgnc.com>

Subject: Cohen v. Preston, Tour Partners

Sam and/or Walter,

Judge Hinde's order on your summary judgment objections did not make it into the record somehow. May I include a copy

as a tab with the appendix?

George May

Twomey May, PLLC

Two Riverway, 15th Floor

Houston, Texas 77056

(713) 659-0000

(281) 201-8485 - fax

george@twomeymay.com

2

Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

November 10, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00392-CV

JAY COHEN, Appellant

V.

TOURS PARTNERS, LTD. AND PRESTON REALTY CORPORATION,

Appellee

On Appeal from the 269th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-41051

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 28, 2015. The clerk’s

record was filed June 10, 2015. No reporter’s record was taken. Appellant’s brief

was due October 15, 2015. No brief was filed.

On October 29, 2015, appellee filed a motion to dismiss for want of

prosecution. See Tex. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellant filed no response. Accordingly,

Exhibit 2

appellee’s motion is granted and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Brown.

2

ACCEPTED

14-15-00392-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

9/9/2015 5:51:38 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

NO: 14-15-00392-CV

IN THE FOURTEENTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

AT HOUSTON, TEXAS

JAY H. COHEN,

Appellant

v.

TOUR PARTNERS, LTD,

Appellee

From the 269th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-41051

APPELLANT’S THIRD MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF TO ALLOW TIME FOR

SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD TO BE FILED

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3, Appellant Jay H.

Cohen files this Motion for Extension of Time to File his Appellant’s Brief,

which motion complies with Rule 10.5(b), and in support thereof would

respectfully show as follows:

1. This is an appeal from a final judgment in Cause No. 2013-41051;

Jay H. Cohen v. Tour Partners, Ltd. and Preston Realty Corporation; in the

269th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas.

2. This is Appellant’s third request for an extension of time.

Exhibit 3

Appellant’s first unopposed request was granted on July 9, 2015 and his second

unopposed request was granted on August 13, 2015.

3. The original clerk’s record was incomplete. The clerk’s record

filed failed to contain all of the summary judgment pleadings upon which the

trial court ruled and a supplemental record was requested on July 29, 2015.

4. Appellant also filed an Unopposed Motion with the Court of

Appeals to permit the filing of the Supplemental Clerk’s Record. The Court of

Appeals granted Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Supplement the Clerk’s

Record on August 13, 2015.

5. Appellee’s counsel has stated that Appellee opposes this request

for an extension to allow time for the requested Supplemental Clerk’s Record to

be filed.

6. The Supplemental Clerk’s Record has not been prepared or filed.

Attached as Exhibit 1 hereto is Appellant’s counsel’s correspondence of even

date to the Harris County District Clerk requesting that the Supplemental

Clerk’s Record be RUSHED.

7. The extended deadline for Appellant to file his initial brief is

today, September 9, 2015.

8. Because the Supplemental Clerk’s Record has yet to be filed,

Appellant is unable to properly or adequately prepare Appellant’s brief and is

2

requesting an extension of time until the earlier of 14-days after the

Supplemental Clerk’s Record is filed or October 15, 2015.

9. Mr. Cohen does not seek this extension for the purposes of delay.

Appellant seeks this extension in the interest of justice; specifically to permit

the incomplete record to be supplemented pursuant to the pending request to the

trial court clerk.

PRAYER

For all these reasons, Appellant Jay H. Cohen respectfully requests a 30-

day extension of time for filing his Appellant’s Brief from today, September 9,

2015 until the earlier of 14-days after the Supplemental Clerk’s Record is filed

with the Court of Appeals or October 15, 2015. Mr. Cohen also seeks all such

other or further relief to which he may be justly entitled.

TWOMEY | MAY, PLLC

/s/ George F. May/

_______________________________

George F. May

TBA No. 24037050

2 Riverway, 15th Floor

Houston, Texas 77056

(713) 659-0000 [Telephone]

(832) 201-8485 [Telecopier]

george@twomeymay.com

Counsel for Appellant, Jay H. Cohen

3

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I certify that on September 9, 2015, I conferred with Sam Haren, co-counsel for

Appellee, via email and counsel stated that Appellee is opposed to this motion.

/s/ George F. May/

_______________________________

George F. May

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

As required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.3 and 9.5(b), (d), (e), I

certify that I have served this document on counsel for Appellee as listed below

on September 9, 2015 as follows:

Walter J. Cicack

wcicack@hmgnc.com

HAWASH MEAD GASTON NEESE & CICACK, LLP

2118 Smith Street

Houston, Texas 77002

Telephone: (713) 658-9001

Facsimile: (713) 658-9011

Attorneys for Appellee Tour Partners, Ltd.

By (check all that apply)

personal delivery

mail

commercial delivery service

X fax, email, or electronic service

/s/ George F. May/

George F. May

Date: September 9, 2015

4

TWOMEY | MAY, P.L.L.C. TWOMEY | MAY, P.L.L.C.

Attorneys at Law 2 Riverway, 15th Floor

George F. May Houston, Texas 77056

george@twomeymay.com (713) 659-0000 – Telephone

(832) 201-8485 – Telecopier

August 9, 2015

Mr. Chris Daniel Via E-File and Hand Delivery

District Clerk, Civil Division

Attn: Ms. Phyllis Washington, Deputy

Post Judgment

P.O. Box 4651

Houston, Texas 77210

RE: Request to Rush Supplemental Clerk’s Record in Appellate Case No. 14-15-00392-CV;

Jay Cohen v. Tour Partners, Ltd. and Preston Realty Corporation; In the Fourteenth

Court of Appeals, Houston, Texas- Trial Court No. 2012-41051

Dear Ms. Washington:

On July 29, 2015, a request to supplement the clerk’s record in the above referenced case was

filed by Appellant Jay Cohen. The request is attached as Exhibit A.

On August 13, 2015, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals granted Mr. Cohen’s motion to

supplement the Clerk’s Record. Notice of the Court of Appeal’s Order is attached as Exhibit B.

The deadline for Mr. Cohen’s Appellant’s brief was set to be today, September 9, 2015. The

supplemental record has not been prepared or filed and Mr. Cohen is requesting that the

preparation and filing of the supplemental clerk’s record be RUSHED and fulfilled on the earliest

possible date.

Please contact me when your office has calculated the estimated cost of the supplemental record

and we will hand-deliver payment the same day.

Thank you for your assistance and cooperation in this urgent matter. Please contact me if you

have any questions.

Very truly yours,

/s/ George F. May/

George F. May

Counsel for Appellant Jay Cohen

Cc: Walter Cicack (via e-mail to wcicack@hmgnc.com)

Sam Haren (via e-mail to sharen@hmgnc.com)

EXHIBIT A

7/29/2015 4:30:28 PM

Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County

Envelope No. 6281005

By: Duane Gilmore

Filed: 7/29/2015 4:30:28 PM

NO. 2013-41051

JAY COHEN, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

Plaintiff §

§

v. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

§

TOUR PARTNERS, LTD., and §

PRESTON REALTY CORPORATION, §

k

Defendants § 269th JUDICIAL DISTRICT

ler

tC

REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL CLERK’S RECORD

ric

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

ist

COMES NOW Plaintiff Jay Cohen pursuant to Rule 34.5 of the Texas Rule of Appellate

lD

nie

Procedure to respectfully request that the clerk prepare a supplement to the record in the appeal

Da

from the above numbered and styled case. The supplemental record should be certified and

is

delivered to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Appeal Case 14-15-00392-CV.

hr

C

Mr. Cohen requests that the following be included in the supplemental record:

of

Image No. 65211494 Plaintiff Jay Cohens Notice of Appeal - filed on 04/28/2015; 2 pages

e

Image No. 64452951 Plaintiff's Motion for New Trial - filed on 02/27/2015; 8 pages

ffic

Image No. 64023492 ORDER SIGNED GRANTING ENTRY OF TEMPORARY ORDERS -

filed on 01/28/2015; 5 pages

yO

Image No. 63171721 Plaintiff Jay Cohen's motion for default judgment against defendant Preston

Realty Corporation - filed on 11/13/2014; 5 pages

Image No. 63171722 Exhibit A - filed on 11/13/2014; 2 pages

op

Image No. 63171723 Exhibit B - filed on 11/13/2014; 2 pages

C

Image No. 63171724 Exhibit C - filed on 11/13/2014; 3 pages

Image No. 63171725 Exhibit C-1 - filed on 11/13/2014; 3 pages

ial

Image No. 63171726 Exhibit C-2 - filed on 11/13/2014; 4 pages

fic

Image No. 63093159 Tour Partner's motion to strike and special exceptions - filed on

11/07/2014; 4 pages

of

Image No. 63171651 Proposed Order - filed on 11/13/2014; 1 page

Un

Image No. 63102481 Notice of submission - filed on 11/07/2014; 1 page

Image No. 63084911 Tour Partner's reply in support of its traditional and no evidence motion for

summary judgment and objections to Cohen's summary judgment evidence - filed on 11/06/2014;

17 pages

Image No. 63084913 Exhibit 20 - filed on 11/06/2014; 12 pages

Image No. 63084914 Exhibit 21 - filed on 11/06/2014; 19 pages

Image No. 63084915 Exhibit 22 - filed on 11/06/2014; 7 pages

Image No. 63030179 Plaintiff's objection and response to defendant's traditional and No-

evidence motion for summary judgment - filed on 11/03/2014; 27 pages

Image No. 63030198 Ex. 16 - filed on 11/03/2014; 8 pages

Image No. 63030180 Exhibit A - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages

Image No. 63037684 Exhibit A - filed on 11/03/2014; 2 pages

Image No. 63030181 Exhibit A-1 - filed on 11/03/2014; 15 pages

Image No. 63030192 Exhibit A-10 - filed on 11/03/2014; 22 pages

Image No. 63030193 Exhibit A-11 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages

Image No. 63030194 Exhibit A-12 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages

Image No. 63030195 Exhibit A-13 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages

Image No. 63030196 Exhibit A-14 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages

Image No. 63030197 Exhibit A-15 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages

k

ler

Image No. 63030199 Exhibit A-16a - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages

Image No. 63030200 Exhibit A-17 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages

tC

Image No. 63030201 Exhibit A-18 - filed on 11/03/2014; 9 pages

Image No. 63030202 Exhibit A-19 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages

ric

Image No. 63030182 Exhibit A-2 - filed on 11/03/2014; 15 pages

Image No. 63030203 Exhibit A-20 - filed on 11/03/2014; 32 pages

ist

Image No. 63030204 Exhibit A-21 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages

lD

Image No. 63030205 Exhibit A-22 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages

Image No. 63030206 Exhibit A-23 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages

nie

Image No. 63030207 Exhibit A-24 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages

Image No. 63030208 Exhibit A-25 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages

Da

Image No. 63030209 Exhibit A-26 - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages

Image No. 63030210 Exhibit A-27 - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages

is

Image No. 63030211 Exhibit A-28 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages

hr

Image No. 63030183 Exhibit A-3 - filed on 11/03/2014; 2 pages

Image No. 63037683 EXHIBIT A-4 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages

C

Image No. 63030185 Exhibit A-5 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages

of

e

Image No. 63030186 Exhibit A-6 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages

Image No. 63030187 Exhibit A-7 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages

ffic

Image No. 63030188 Exhibit A-8 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages

yO

Image No. 63030189 Exhibit A-9 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages

Image No. 63030190 Exhibit A-9a - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages

Image No. 63030191 Exhibit A-9b - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages

op

Image No. 63030212 Exhibit B - filed on 11/03/2014; 2 pages

C

Image No. 63030213 Exhibit B-1 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages

Image No. 63030214 Exhibit B-2 - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages

ial

Image No. 63030215 Exhibit C - filed on 11/03/2014; -145 pages

fic

Image No. 63093155 Proposed Order - filed on 11/07/2014; 2 pages

Image No. 63030217 Plaintiff's objection and response to defendant's traditional and No-

of

evidence motion for summary judgment - filed on 11/03/2014; 27 pages

Un

Image No. 63030236 Exhibit 16 - filed on 11/03/2014; 8 pages

Image No. 63030218 Exhibit A - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages

Image No. 63030219 Exhibit A-1 - filed on 11/03/2014; 15 pages

Image No. 63030230 Exhibit A-10 - filed on 11/03/2014; 22 pages

Image No. 63030231 Exhibit A-11 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages

Image No. 63030232 Exhibit A-12 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages

Image No. 63030233 Exhibit A-13 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages

Image No. 63030234 Exhibit A-14 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages

Image No. 63030235 Exhibit A-15 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages

Image No. 63030237 Exhibit A-16a - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages

2

Image No. 63030238 Exhibit A-17 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages

Image No. 63030239 Exhibit A-18 - filed on 11/03/2014; 9 pages

Image No. 63030240 Exhibit A-19 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages

Image No. 63030220 Exhibit A-2 - filed on 11/03/2014; 15 pages

Image No. 63030241 Exhibit A-20 - filed on 11/03/2014; 32 pages

Image No. 63030242 Exhibit A-21 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages

Image No. 63030243 Exhibit A-22 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages

Image No. 63030244 Exhibit A-23 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages

Image No. 63030245 Exhibit A-24 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages

Image No. 63030246 Exhibit A-25 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages

k

ler

Image No. 63030247 Exhibit A-26 - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages

Image No. 63030248 Exhibit A-27 - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages

tC

Image No. 63030249 Exhibit A-28 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages

Image No. 63030221 Exhibit A-3 - filed on 11/03/2014; 2 pages

ric

Image No. 63030222 Exhibit A-4 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages

Image No. 63030223 Exhibit A-5 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages

ist

Image No. 63030224 Exhibit A-6 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages

lD

Image No. 63030225 Exhibit A-7 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages

Image No. 63030226 Exhibit A-8 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages

nie

Image No. 63030227 Exhibit A-9 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages

Image No. 63030228 Exhibit A-9a - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages

Da

Image No. 63030229 Exhibit A-9b - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages

Image No. 63030250 Exhibit B - filed on 11/03/2014; 2 pages

is

Image No. 63030251 Exhibit B-1 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages

hr

Image No. 63030252 Exhibit B-2 - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages

Image No. 63030253 Exhibit C - filed on 11/03/2014; 145 pages

C

Image No. 62928870 Tour Partners Response to Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Substitute

of

Counsel - filed on 10/27/2014; 2 pages

e

Image No. 62861852 Plaintiff Jay Cohen's unopposed Motion to Substitute counsel - filed on

10/22/2014; 4 pages

ffic

Image No. 62861853 proposed order granting motion to substitute counsel - filed on 10/22/2014;

yO

2 pages

Image No. 62821118 Tour Partners' Traditional and No-Evidence Motion for Summary

Judgment - filed on 10/17/2014; 36 pages

op

Image No. 62821121 Exhibit 1 - filed on 10/17/2014; 76 pages

C

Image No. 62821130 Exhibit 10 - filed on 10/17/2014; 3 pages

Image No. 62821131 Exhibit 11 - filed on 10/17/2014; 3 pages

ial

Image No. 62821132 Exhibit 12 - filed on 10/17/2014; 4 pages

fic

Image No. 62821133 Exhibit 13 - filed on 10/17/2014; 4 pages

Image No. 62821134 Exhibit 14 - filed on 10/17/2014; 4 pages

of

Image No. 62821135 Exhibit 15 - filed on 10/17/2014; 7 pages

Un

Image No. 62821136 Exhibit 16 - filed on 10/17/2014; 15 pages

Image No. 62821137 Exhibit 17 - filed on 10/17/2014; 8 pages

Image No. 62821138 Exhibit 18 - filed on 10/17/2014; 9 pages

Image No. 62821139 Exhibit 19 - filed on 10/17/2014; 5 pages

Image No. 62821122 Exhibit 2 - filed on 10/17/2014; 5 pages

Image No. 62821123 Exhibit 3 - filed on 10/17/2014; 3 pages

Image No. 62821124 Exhibit 4 - filed on 10/17/2014; 19 pages

Image No. 62821125 Exhibit 5 - filed on 10/17/2014; 12 pages

Image No. 62821126 Exhibit 6 - filed on 10/17/2014; 6 pages

Image No. 62821127 Exhibit 7 - filed on 10/17/2014; 45 pages

3

Image No. 62821128 Exhibit 8 - filed on 10/17/2014; 2 pages

Image No. 62821129 Exhibit 9 - filed on 10/17/2014; 4 pages

Image No. 62663391 Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel - filed on 10/07/2014; 2 pages

Image No. 62663392 Docket Control Order - filed on 10/07/2014; 1 pages

Image No. 62690110 Exhibit 03 - filed on 10/09/2014; 2 pages

Image No. 62305356 ORDER SIGNED GRANTING ENTRY OF TEMPORARY

ORDERS - filed on 08/25/2014; 1 pages

Image No. 61683924 Discovery Control Plan - filed on 07/23/2014; 1 pages

Image No. 61512462 Plaintiffs Ellington F Holdings LLC's and R. David Denenberg's

Objections and Response in Opposition to Defendant Tour Partners, Ltd.'s Motion to Consolidate

k

ler

- filed on 07/10/2014; 7 pages

Image No. 61519437 Supplement to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant, Tour Partners, Ltd.'s,

tC

Motion for Judicial Review of Documentation or Instrument Purporting to Create a Lien, Claim

or Interest in Real Property - filed on 07/10/2014; 3 pages

ric

Image No. 61519438 Plaintiffs Ellington F Holdings LLC's and R. David Denenburg's Amended

Objections and Response in Opposition to defendant Tour Partners, Ltd.'s Motion to Consolidate

ist

- filed on 07/10/2014; 7 pages

lD

Image No. 61519439 Exhibit 1 - filed on 07/10/2014; 61 pages

Image No. 61519440 Exhibit 2 - filed on 07/10/2014; 7 pages

nie

Image No. 61519441 Exhibit 3 - filed on 07/10/2014; 15 pages

Image No. 61519442 Proposed Order - filed on 07/10/2014; 1 pages

Da

Image No. 61528236 Plaintiff's response to defendant, Tour Partners, LTD's motion for judicial

review of documentation or instrument purporting to create a lien, claim or interest in real

is

property - filed on 07/10/2014; 8 pages

hr

Image No. 61528242 Exhibit A - filed on 07/10/2014; 6 pages

Image No. 61528243 Exhibit B - filed on 07/10/2014; 9 pages

C

Image No. 61528244 Exhibit C - filed on 07/10/2014; 5 pages

of

Image No. 61528245 Proposed order - filed on 07/10/2014; 1 pages

e

Image No. 61528501 Plaintiff's response to defendant, Tour Partners, LTD's motion to

consolidate - filed on 07/10/2014; 2 pages

ffic

Image No. 61528504 Proposed order - filed on 07/10/2014; 1 pages

yO

Image No. 60738990 Defendant Tour Partners, ltd.'s motion to consolidate - filed on 05/09/2014;

3 pages

Image No. 60738991 Exhibit 1 - filed on 05/09/2014; 1 pages

op

Image No. 60738992 Proposed order - filed on 05/09/2014; 2 pages

C

Image No. 60741538 Defendant Tour Partners motion for judicial review of documentation or

instrument purporting to create a lien, claim, or interest in real property - filed on 05/09/2014; 6

ial

pages

fic

Image No. 60741541 Exhibit 1, Subordination of Lien - filed on 05/09/2014; 4 pages

Image No. 60741543 Proposed order - filed on 05/09/2014; 2 pages

of

Image No. 60745044 Exhibit a to Defendants Second amended answer and original counterclaim

Un

- filed on 05/09/2014; 4 pages

Image No. 58939261 Defendants withdrawal of defendants amended motion to dismiss directed

to plaintiffs first amended petition - filed on 12/24/2013 2 pages

Image No. 58636392 Plaintiff's second amended petition - filed on 12/06/2013 8 pages

Image No. 58636433 Plaintiff's second amended petition - filed on 12/06/2013 8 pages

Image No. 586Image No. 62602 Plaintiff's Response to Tour Partners, Ltd.'s Amended Motion

to Dismiss - filed on 12/06/2013 9 pages

Image No. 58388466 Defendant's Amended Motion to Dismiss Directed to Plaintiff's

First Amended Petition - filed on 11/21/2013 6 pages

Image No. 57990831 Plaintiffs Response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss - filed on 10/25/2013

4

4 pages

Image No. 58052445 Plaintiff's First Amended Petition - filed on 10/25/2013 7 pages

Image No. 58052446 Exhibit E - filed on 10/25/2013 3 pages

Image No. 57672083 Defendants Motion to Dismiss - filed on 10/07/2013 9 pages

Image No. 57672084 Original Answer Subject to Motion to Dismiss - filed on 10/07/2013 4

pages

Please expedite this request as the appeal is currently pending. Mr. Cohen will pre-pay

k

ler

the estimated cost of the supplemental record immediately.

tC

: Respectfully submitted,

ric

TWOMEY | MAY, PLLC

ist

lD

/s/ George F. May/

_______________________________

nie

George F. May

State Bar No. 24037050

Da

2 Riverway, 15th Floor

is

Houston, Texas 77056

(713) 659-0000 Telephone

hr

(832) 201-8485 Facsimile

C

george@twomeymay.com

of

Attorneys for Plaintiff Jay Cohen

e

ffic

yO

op

C

ial

fic

of

Un

5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

As required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.3 and 9.5(b), (d), (e), I certify that I have

served this document on all other parties, which are listed below on July 29, 2015 as follows:

Walter J. Cicack

wcicack@hmgnc.com

HAWASH MEAD GASTON NEESE & CICACK, LLP

2118 Smith Street

k

Houston, Texas 77002

ler

Telephone: (713) 658-9001

tC

Facsimile: (713) 658-9011

ric

Attorneys for Defendant Tour Partners, Ltd.

ist

By (check all that apply)

lD

personal delivery

nie

mail

commercial delivery service

X Da

fax, email, or electronic service

is

hr

/s/ George F. May/

C

George F. May

of

Date: July 28, 2015

e

ffic

yO

op

C

ial

fic

of

Un

6

EXHIBIT B

FILE COPY

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

301 Fannin, Suite 245

Houston, Texas 77002

Thursday, August 13, 2015

RE: Case No. 14-15-00392-CV

Style: Jay Cohen

v. Tours Partners, Ltd. and Preston Realty Corporation

Please be advised that on this day the Court GRANTED APPELLANT’S

motion to supplement the record in the above cause.

T. C. Case # 2013-41051 Christopher Prine, Clerk

Harris County, District Clerk, Civil Division

Harris County District Clerk - Civil

201 Caroline, Ste 420

Houston, TX 77002

DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

301 Fannin, Suite 245

Houston, Texas 77002

Thursday, August 13, 2015

RE: Case No. 14-15-00392-CV

Style: Jay Cohen

v. Tours Partners, Ltd. and Preston Realty Corporation

Please be advised that on this day the Court GRANTED APPELLANT’S

motion to supplement the record in the above cause.

T. C. Case # 2013-41051 Christopher Prine, Clerk

Harris County, District Clerk, Civil Division

Harris County District Clerk - Civil

201 Caroline, Ste 420

Houston, TX 77002

DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL

Exhibit 4

CertifiedDocumentNumber:63124687-Page1of5

Exhibit 5

7A

Pgs-5

CertifiedDocumentNumber:63124687-Page2of5

CertifiedDocumentNumber:63124687-Page3of5

CertifiedDocumentNumber:63124687-Page4of5

CertifiedDocumentNumber:63124687-Page5of5

I, Chris Daniel, District Clerk of Harris

County, Texas certify that this is a true and

correct copy of the original record filed and or

recorded in my office, electronically or hard

copy, as it appears on this date.

Witness my official hand and seal of office

this March 30, 2015

Certified Document Number: 63124687 Total Pages: 5

Chris Daniel, DISTRICT CLERK

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

In accordance with Texas Government Code 406.013 electronically transmitted authenticated

documents are valid. If there is a question regarding the validity of this document and or seal

please e-mail support@hcdistrictclerk.com

Un

of

fic

ial

Co

py

O

ffic

e

of

C

hr

is

Exhibit 6

Da

nie

lD

ist

ric

t Cl

er

k

Un

of

fic

ial

Co

py

O

ffic

e

of

C

hr

is

Da

nie

lD

ist

ric

t Cl

er

k

Un

of

fic

ial

Co

py

O

ffic

e

of

C

hr

is

Da

nie

lD

ist

ric

t Cl

er

k

Un

offic

ial

C

opy

O

ffic

e

of

C

hr

is

Da

nie

lD

ist

ric

t Cl

er

k

Exhibit 7

Sam Haren

From: Walter Cicack

Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 7:28 PM

To: Sam Haren; George May

Subject: RE: Status of Appeal

George, would you at least give us the professional courtesy of a response? Thank you.

Walter Cicack

(713) 658‐9003 (direct)

From: Sam Haren

Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:02 AM

To: Walter Cicack <wcicack@hmgnc.com>; George May <george@twomeymay.com>

Subject: RE: Status of Appeal

George,

After the expiration of last Friday’s deadline, Walter asked me to touch base with you regarding your appeal. Do you still

intend to go forward with Cohen’s remaining case?

Thanks,

Sam

From: Walter Cicack

Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 10:24 AM

To: George May <george@twomeymay.com>

Cc: Sam Haren <sharen@hmgnc.com>

Subject: Status of Appeal

George, it appears that you decided not to file a brief in the appeal of Judge’s Hinde’s judgment despite the fact that you

said you were going to do so and instructed me to inform the court of appeals that you were going to do so.  I will not

even ask you what you intend to do in the other appeal since I cannot rely on your answer.  But I do have a simple

question‐‐ do you oppose our motion asking for leave to allow us to file our brief after you file your brief? As you know,

if Cohen does not pursue the appeal, our appeal point is moot and briefing would not be required. Please let me know

your position on this by 3 pm tomorrow. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you for your

consideration.

Walter J. Cicack

Partner

2118 Smith Street | Houston, TX 77002

tel (713) 658-9003 | mobile (713) 299-2127

fax (713) 658-9011

website | vCard | map | email

This email may be a privileged communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it.

1

Exhibit 8

2

Sam Haren

From: Walter Cicack

Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 10:24 AM

To: George May

Cc: Sam Haren

Subject: Status of Appeal

George, it appears that you decided not to file a brief in the appeal of Judge’s Hinde’s judgment despite the fact that you

said you were going to do so and instructed me to inform the court of appeals that you were going to do so.  I will not

even ask you what you intend to do in the other appeal since I cannot rely on your answer.  But I do have a simple

question‐‐ do you oppose our motion asking for leave to allow us to file our brief after you file your brief? As you know,

if Cohen does not pursue the appeal, our appeal point is moot and briefing would not be required. Please let me know

your position on this by 3 pm tomorrow. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you for your

consideration.

Walter J. Cicack

Partner

2118 Smith Street | Houston, TX 77002

tel (713) 658-9003 | mobile (713) 299-2127

fax (713) 658-9011

website | vCard | map | email

This email may be a privileged communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it.

1

ACCEPTED

14-15-00392-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/8/2015 4:55:58 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

Exhibit 9

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.