The opinion
J'Z_/\S`- 00/?`0~ c/C
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FH_ED ,N
_ The Court of Appeals
siXTH DisTRICT Sixrh oismcr
TEXARKANA, TEXAs .@C`l` l 5 2915
_ 4 Texa§k<atma., ireva
Jack H. Meyer, Pro se, MoVANT § 'Deb'“a ’K~ ’AW@‘)V, ©terr+r<
§
vs. §CAUSE # 2014-0801-¢¢1, 2015-9859-CCL
§CAUsE # 41-72002, 41-72003, 41-73221
THE sTATE oF TEXAS § HCJP 4-1
HARRIsoN Co. CoURT AT LAW §
HARRISON CO. JP COURT Prct 4, Placel §
HARRISON CO. DISTRICT ATTORNEY §
RESPONDENT §
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
TO THE HONRABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:
Comes now Jack H. l\/Ieyer, of 403 Houston st. Jefferson, Texas 75657,and
. petition this court to issue a Writ of l\/landamus pursuant to Rule 72.l & 72.2 of Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedures, 9/1/06 to the movant, Jacl< H. Meyer, ordering the
presiding Judge of Harrison County Court at Law, l\/Ir. Joe Black, and the presiding
Harrison County Justice of the Peace of Prct. 4, Place l, l\/Is Nancy Schnorbus George,
and Harrison County District Attorney, l\/Ir. Coke Soloman to complete without delay
their ministerial duty to prove theirjurisdiction challenged by the movant in pre-trials and
trials or, dismiss all causes against him and return all bonds paid by him in these matters
immediately.
Page 9 ot`24
II.
_111.
IV.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
lssUEs PREsENTED
Failure of accuser to prove Constitutional jurisdiction when challenged by the
Sovereign.
Failure of court to prove Constitutional jurisdiction when challenged by the
Sovereign.
Willful denial by the court of the, authority by right, of the Sovereign to challenge
The administrative and J udicial .lurisdiction of the courts.
The intentional failures of the courts to carry out a Constitutional duty to the
Sovereign, that being the duty to see justice done by due process of judicial law.
The exercise of the powers of government to obstruct justice in the conduct of a
Constitutional duty to the Sovereign.
Intentional exercise of an authority not Constitutionally granted, that being police
power over the Sovereign.
Abuse of office of multiple public officials
Breach of Contract by multiple public officials
PagelO of24
_STATE MENT OF THE CASE
I, Jack H. Meyer, was issued three (3) traffic citations by Texas Department of
Safety for the alleged violation of Texas Traffic Statutes, those being as follows n
a. 6/26/2009, Citation #TX094XOFR0003, for not employing my seat belt.
b. 7/13/2014, Citation #TX135201KC008, for not employing my seat belt &
driving with an expired drivers license;
c. 5/26/2014, Citation #TX42580PRMR8, driving with expired drivers
license & Display of expired registration
In the issuance of each of the above citations I attempted to inform the officer of
the fact that l was a sovereign citizen of Texas not engaged in any act that brought me
under the jurisdiction of Texas administrative statutes That l was simply a private
citizen enjoying my right to freely travel without injuring anyone and not in the authority
of the State to regulate my activity in any way. Simply put, l was not in the jurisdiction of
the State government and there existed no authority of the State to impede or diminish
my right to drive my vehicle on my highway.`
I attempted to explain how l arrived at my interpretation of the law but none of
the officers indicated any interest is hearing it and promptly issued the citations
All citations being non-jailable offenses, the officer informed me that ifl
did not sign the citation l would be arrested and taken tojail. l then signed all tickets with
the notation “Signed Under Duress” and was allowed to.go on about my business
l then contacted the administrative tribunals having territorial jurisdiction of the
citation and filed a l\/Iotion to Dismiss, Challenge of.lurisdiction, and a detailed
Page l l br24
explanation of what their jurisdiction was, as an administrative tribunal and
magistrate l also included a detailed explanation of Police Power and a Challenge of
Jurisdiction with many rulings of the Supreme Court of the United States of America on
the subjects
What followed these filings by me was a five (5) year delay of any further
action in the matter of the citations by the Harrison County Justice Court Prct 4.
Pl'ace l to which I have any notice or knowledge I attempted on two (2)
occasions, over the 5 yr. period, to find out what was going on with my citations
by speaking directly with the JP, Ms Nancy Schnorbus George, but she was never
available and only her office help told they didn’t know anything On one
occasion I tried to speak with her in her office with the same result. To this day l
have never heard her voice or seen her face. She has never appeared at any
hearing or trial on-the matters of these citations, only the State’s attorneys and
some other JP, I assume, who’s name l have no knowledge of or find his name or
signature on the documents of the trial of these matters he conducted
Because of the unusual conduct of these matters, that is to say my inability
to communicate with the JP Court or Justice concerning these citations, l included
in my later filings a letter to Justice George asking what was going on. And,
explaining the ramifications of the obvious lack of action by the JP to expend due
diligence in the conduct of her office To say the least I had some very troubling
questions about her administration of her Constitutionally created office and her duty to
the people who employ her.
Page 12 of24
Finally on 5/31/2014 she notified me by 15‘. class mail that resolution of
the matters by pretrial would begin on 8/14/2014 at 9:00am. In that notice only
two (2) causes were referenced, 41 -68856' and 41-68857. I had no way of
determining which of the citations these causes referred to but believed that
confusion would be cleared during pretrial.
The 8/14/2014 pretrial hearing was only a meeting between myself and the
assistant district attorney of Harrison County. This hearing was not in the presence of the
JP or in the court room. The assistant DA started the meeting by informing me that this
was a serious matter and that I should surrender to his will by accepting the citations and
paying the fines or suffer the full weight of the law. l promptly informed him I would not
and that l would accept only the trial and by jury. This caused the young man to become
more than a little upset with me and he explained that my understanding of law was so
completely wrong that when combined with the letter sent to the JP it bordered on more
serious violations of law of which he would also convict me. With that communicated he
stood up and proceeded to leave the room. 1 then notified him of the challenge of g
jurisdiction which he was compelled to obey before any trial on the matter proceeded
He had by that time entered the courtroom where others were waiting. His reply was that
the challenge was not going to be taken up and he left my presence in a very angry state. I
did not then know if he meant that the challenge would not be addressed in pretrial or
trial. All I knew was that he was not going to discuss the matter right then.
What followed was a notice from the JP by Certified mail on 9/1 1/2014
that trial was set for 10/8/2014 at 9:00am.
Page 13 of24
I arrive for trial at 8:30am and awaited my turn before the court. I find that
the jury has already been selected and empanelled in the jury box. l then found out there
would be no Voir Dire. When the trial begins the man presiding is unknown to me and I
ask who he is and why Justice George is not conducting the proceedings He informs me
that justice George will not be conducting the trial and that he is I believe he stated that
he was the Hallsville, Texas JP and was acting in her behalf but can not be certain of that
now. We proceeded with trial, he informed me of the causes against me and asked how I
pleaded. I replied innocent and then reminded him there was the matter of the challenge
of jurisdiction before the court and it must be resolved before any further proceedings
were allowed by law. The justice bluntly stated he would not entertain any such
challenge. l informed him of my objection and informed the court reporter that all of the
words spoken in the trial had better be on the record. The justice informed me this court
was not a court of record. l then informed him the law-allowed no discretion in the
Challenge, that it was not in his authority to ignore one. He then interrupted
me and denied the challenge and instructed me to prove myjurisdiction. Before I
could speak he informed me that the letter 1 had sent Justice George, which he was
holding, was so serious a threat that he could charge me with threatening a judge. l then
informed him that I not only objected to the denial of challenge bu/t the entire
proceedings He replied that my only option was to accept his instructed verdict of guilty
and appeal the ruling. Knowing this court was not interested in any justice and my only
option was an appeal I accepted the ruling, with objection. l notified the court of my
intention to appeal. The man informed me there would be a bond required and that l had
ten days to file my notice of appeal with the JP court. We all then retired from the
courtroom.
Page 14 of24
I then filed my notice of appeal (Exhibit 2) with the Harrison County Clerks
office, tendered my $884.00 cash appeal bond and asked the Clerk, Ms Cox, what was
required of me next. She replied that the Clerks office would notify me by mail.
On 11/7/2014 I received a postcard from the Harrison County Criminal
District Attorney informing me of that I-was to appear before the Harrison County
Court at Law in the matter ofcause # 2014-0801 on 11/18/2014 at 9:OOam. l
I appear in the Harrison County Court at Law, believing it is in the matter
of my appeal to‘that court. The judge presiding was Judge Ammerman, who was soon
to be replaced by the newly elected judge Black. Judge Ammerman wished to leave the
matter of my appeal to incoming Judge Black and set no court date at this hearing. I
returned home to await Judge Black’s communication of his intentions in the appeal.
On 3/20/2015 I receive a USPO notice of attempt to deliver a certified
mail. lt is too late on this day, Friday, to pick it up at the post office and I am
delayed until the following Monday, 3/23/2015, to pick up the mail. This certified mail
contains: (Exibit 3a)
1. What I believe is ajudgment ofthe Harrison County Court at Law of
failing to appear in cause # 2014-0801 on 1/20/2015, causing my appeal
bond to be forfeited (Exhibit 3b) ~
2. What I believe is a form of some charge, it is a blank form,‘ except for the
hand written cause number at the top, Civil cause # 2015-9859 and typed
Criminal cause # 2014-0801. (Exhibit 3c)
3. A trial setting notice of the above noted civil and criminal causes on 9/10/2015 at
2:30pm and signed byjudge .loe Black. (Exhibit 3d)
4. A statement ofBaliff, l\/lr. l-Ienderson, stating 1 had not appeared at a
Page 15 of24
pretrial hearing/(a hand written word 1 can not read) on 1/20/2015 of
causes 2014-0801 and or 2015-9859, and signed by Baliff Henderson.
(Exhibit 3e)
5. A photocopy of the personal check 1 tendered for my appeal bond, that
lwas declined and returned to me. 1 paid bond with a cashiers check from
my local bank, copied on reverse of original photocopy. (Exhibit 3f)
6. A judgment NSIS ordering my forfeiture of bond and, 1 believe, my arrest
for failing to appear in court on 1/20/2015 in causes 2014-0801 and or
2015-9859, being signed by judge Black. (Exhibit 3g)
1 immediately stop every thing 1 am doing and respond via certified mail in sworn
affidavit, that 1 do not have~nor have 1 had any notice of any hearing or trial for any
matter before the courts of Harrison Co., not a postcard, 1Sl class mail, certified mail or
hand delivered notice. 1 object to'the charge and remind the court that a unanswered
challenge ofjurisdiction exist in the matter of cause #2014-0801 which makes further
proceedings without effect. 1 also explain that when a public official exceeds his authority
he also exits his sovereign immunity. The proof of delivery card for this reply shows it
was mailed and received on 3/25/2015, well within the stated time limit in the above
documents of the court. (Exhibit 4) »
On 7/31/2015 1 receive a certified notice from the Harrison County Court ofa
judgment NSIS hearing in cause 2015-9859-CCL has been reset for 9/17/2015 at 2:30pm,
and signed by Judge Black.
Page |6 of24
`On 9/17/2015 1 appear in Harrison County Court and am promptly
arrested for failing to appear at not just a hearing in Harrison County Court but
three (3) additional causes before the Harrison County Justice Court Prct. 4,
Place 1. To say that 1 am surprised would be a gross understatement 1 am handed
a memo by Judge Black resetting cause 2015-9859 to 10/1/2015. 1 am
jailed in Harrison Co. Jail and put under a total of $3,500.00 bond (Exhibit 5). Being Pro
Se it is now impossible for me to defend myself. 1t is only by the physical and financial
help of friends that 1 make CASH bond and gain my release, which 1 do on the
evening of 10/20/15.
1n my release documents 1 become aware of three (3) more new causes held
against me, 41-72002, 41 -72003 and 41-73221. 1 can only assume they stem from
Harrison Co JP court Prct 4, Place 1 because of the “41 ” numbers 1 have no knowledge
of any matter before that justice court. All the matters 1 do have knowledge of are in
Harrison County Court. 1 now know what is afoot in Harrison Co., it is the very same
tactic employed against me by the 1\/1arshall Municipal court to make life as hard as
possible on me to extort my submission. They however backed down when 1 informed
them of notice requirements of law and released me from jail. 1 have never failed to
appear at any hearing or trial 1 had knowledge of. 1 was not notified!
1 am now working to assemble my defense against all of these charges A task that
requires me to stop all other matters 1\/1y business is shut down, all other commitments
1 am involved in have stopped, This matter.now requires all of my resources to assemble
my defense. Against who? The very people we hired to protect us!
4 Page 17 of24
STATE MENT OF THE FACTS
Beginning at the issuance of all traffic citations in this matter 1 informed all
concerned they enjoyed no jurisdiction over me in my private activity. 1 also informed
them that all administrative statutes were only internal rules and regulations of the
y government having no force or effect on the sovereign citizen. Subsequently, 1 filed
under sworn affidavit documents to bring dismissal of the charges and written challenges
of their jurisdiction to make or enforce law over any sovereign citizen. These documents
and the force of law they invoke were disregarded, denied and the requirements of them
violated by all officials involved.
Without doubt the government officials involved in this violation have acted to
_ avoid exposure of their violations by bringing false charges against Jack H. Meyer,
thereby assassinating my character, inflicting great pain, suffering and injury. They stop
proceedings in the cause that is challenged and proceed with causes of their own
huenuomthmebykeqnngbeknedw}nmhcsonmdnngdwylwhevedwycanconuof
Proceedings only and completely in the favor of the officials and{all without authority.
ln the process no court in which any traffic citation against Jack H. Meyer was
brought has ever been prosecuted, not one out of about 15 at this time! No court, once
c'hallenged, has ever proven its jurisdiction to prosecute Jack H. l\/Ieyer. They have only
acted as the Harrison County Courts are now or do nothing, leaving the matter in limbo,
not prosecuted or dismissed, as the Harrison County'.lustice George and all other courts
have.
Page 18 0f24`
ARGUl\/IENT THEREON
This case 1 bring before you Sirs comes down to one very clear requirement of
law, Jurisdiction. Every government official 1 have challenged in accordance with law
has neither proved jurisdiction, tried to prove jurisdiction, allowed any argument in
court of jurisdiction, and denied outright the right of the accused to challenge jurisdiction
One justice even ordered me to prove my own jurisdiction Unfortunately, 1 did not have
my birth certificate with me at that time and could not. An error 1 quickly corrected!
The issue is not that jurisdiction does or does not exist, it is the failure of the court
to know it exist, the failure of the court to determine that it in fact has jurisdiction when
jurisdiction is brought into question and the failure to show proof to its employer when
it is required by law.
When any reasonably intelligent man observes the extent to which the courts have
gone to avoid proving jurisdiction it is undeniable that they DO NOT WISH TO PROVE
IT. 1f they did this request would not be before you now. Without doubt, this problem is
systemic, it is nationwide, the Supreme Law of this nation is being overthrown And, it is
being done by the very people we elected to obey and administer it.
Jurisdiction is the most important requirement of any law. lt is the first
and foremost matter before any court in this land. lt is the one determination from which
all further authority must and does stem. This one simple fact of all law is so well settled
it is self evident. Withoutjurisdiction there can be no justice. lt simply can not exist
OutSiCl€ authOrity. (The laws of our intellectual nature do not allow it. “The creator has authority over
it’s(his) creation”.)
Page 19 0f24
The issue before a court has no bearing on its requirement to have jurisdiction
Jurisdiction is required by all courts and in all matters And, for justice to be rendered the
judge of that court must have personal knowledge of that jurisdiction To believe
otherwise is to leave justice to the whims of hearsay. A court can be whatever it wants if
its administrator is allowed to act on whatever authority he believes he has Any court
that does is notjudicial, its vigilante at best,
The requirement of jurisdiction is so fundamental to our system of justice that
there is no need of any evidence for or against any allegation of lack of jurisdiction 1f
only the fact that it is not known by a court then this court knows authority is not
present. At this point it is the duty of the Appellate Court to require proof of jurisdiction
from all lower courts, our law leaves no alternative
1t should be sufficient for this court to have only a sworn allegation of failure to
to prove jurisdiction, when challenged in that court, for it to order, in all courts in its
district, that proof is to be produced, displayed and recorded in' all courts before they may
proceed Absent that proof no jurisdiction exist, the cause does not exist, and must be
dismissed This is a nation under law, not man The law must be obeyed! (The
Constitution ofthe United States of America)(The Constitution ofthe State ofTexas)
This writ of mandamus sought under the facts of this case show that a ministerial
act of both the Harrison County Court at law judge, .loe Black, on appeal from, and the
Harrison County Justice of the Peace Prct. 4, Place l, Ms Nancy Schnorbus George failed
to prove jurisdiction in the matter before their courts when challenged by the accused
And, when demanded in trial denied the challenge and summarily convicted the accused
by instructed verdict. -
l\/lov_ant has repeatedly and properly requested performance but was refused
Page 20 of24
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED,
Ma_nt, Jack H. Meyer, prays that this petition for a Writ of Mandamus be granted
ordering the presiding judge of the Harrison County Court at Law, Joe Black, and the
presiding justice of the Harrison County Justice Court, Prct. 4, Place l, Nancy Schnorbus
George, carry out their ministerial duty and prove their respective jurisdictions in the
matters of Jack H. Meyer, or dismiss the causes against him.
Movant also prays that the written proof tendered for their respective jurisdiction be
immediately communicated in writing to this court for its consideration, and notification
to those courts and movant of your judgment thereof.
Movant also prays that this court order that all proceedings in the matter of Jack H.
Meyer in the courts of Harrison Co. Texas be stopped until the judgment and order of this
court is rendered, as the law requires
wm also prays that this court order all bonds now paid in cash by Jack H. Meyer in
the matters before the Harrison Co. Courts be immediately returned to him in the
instruments they were tendered Those being the total sum of $4,384.00 US. And no
further requirements of bond be placed on him in the matters before the Harrison Co.
Courts
RESPECTFULLY SUBl\/IITTED,
\S\ Jack l-l.Meyer
Jack H. l\/leyer, Pro Se
403 l-louston, st.
Jefferson, Texas 75657
_ , 903-665-4677
Page 21 of24
DECLARATION
All statements made in these documents are sworn to be true and correct by the
affidavit on page l of this document, being pages 2 through 24, with attachments #1 - #5,
on the date of the affidavit
\S\ lack H.l\/leyer
lack H. Meyer, Pro Se
403 Houston, st.
Jefferson, Texas 75657
903-665-4677
_CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE_
1, Jack H. Meyer, certify that a true and complete copy of this document, that
being an application for a Writ of l\/Iandamus and Motion for Leave to File, Affidavit
covering the facts in the documents and all other,documents included have been sent via
US Certified Mail on this day 15th of Oct. , 2015 to:
l. Harrison County Court at Law, 200 W Houston, l\/larshall, Texas 75670
USPO Certified mail # 7014 1820 0001 4475 3485
2. Harrison County Justice Court Prct. 4, Place l, 200 W. Houston,
l\/Iarshall, Texas 75670 '
USPO Certified mail # 7014 1820 0001 4475 3478
3. Harrison County District Attorney, 200 W. Houston l\/Iarshall Texas 75670
USPO Certified mail # 7014 1820 0001 4475 3492 `
\S\ Jack H.l\/leyer
Jack H. Meyer, Pro Se
403 Houston, st.
Jefferson, Texas 75657
903-665-4677
APPENDIX
Exhibit #l; Texas Standard Certificate of Birth # 11514, file # 63, of
1/31/1947 of the Movant, Jack H. Meyer.
Exhibit #2; Form 1 10, lnstructed verdict in causes # 41 -68856 & 41-68857 of
10/08/2014 before the Harrison County Justice Court, Prct 4, Place
Exhibit #3; Certified Mail letter from Harrison County Clerk, Patsy Cox,
3a.
3b.
3c.
3.d.
received on 3/23/2015 containing:
Certified mail envelope
Notice or Warrant? From Harrison County Clerk Cox dated 3/16/2015,
stating Bond is forfeited for failing to appear.
Sheriff’s Return Form, Blank, with cause # 2015-9859 handwritten
Trial setting notice, of 3/13/2015 setting trial on 9/10/2015 for cause
#2015-9859.
Statement of Baliff, for cause 2014-0801 and 2015-9859, Filed 1/27/2015,
signed by BaliffHenderson. l
Photocopy of personal check tendered for appeal bond, declined by HC
Clerk Cox, 1 have copied my carbon copy of Casher’s Check which paid
bond on the reverse side of this photocopy.
Judgment NSIS by Harrison County _ludge Joe Black filed 1/16/2015 in
cause 2015-9859.
Exhibit #4; The 3/24/2015 response letter by Jack H. Meyer to the above
letter, Exhibit #3, with proof of delivery card, 4 pages
Page 23 of24
5. Exhibit #5: Cash Bond Documents` (4ea); # 5429 (5a), 5430 (5b), 5431 (5c),
5432 (5d). showing release for Harrison County Jail on 9/20/2015.
6. All other documents in my possession are notices from the courts and my written
response with objection to them. Due to page limit of this petition they are
omitted
7. 1 do not have possession of any warrants for my arrest. My only knowledge that
they must exist is from the resulting action of the government.
8. No further evidence of the facts stated herein is in my possession To date no
motion for discovery or subpoena for these records or evidence has made
these documents available to me.
All documents attached and noted in this appendix are photocopies or scans of the
original documents, which have not been altered in any way. They are true and accurate
copies of the original documents The certification of which is under the sworn affidavit
which is attached to and part of the documents stated in that affidavit
\S\ Jack H.Meyer
Jack H. l\/leyer, Pro Se
403 Houston, st._
Jefferson, Texas 75657
903-665-4677
Page 24 of24
Exhibit l
»ix!...m»....-..: 1. .. .... .. . .4.. 1 .. .\_.. .....,1`...._.....,.,,1...\ ...1..1....1.3._.....:.§11.11,.:..,.11.11. .1.. . :...1`..111.)1.1.131\.;1...,....,. ;M .l....-....._.]...,.&..d.
awax. ....,-._s. .H.z;..§», serious mann v m_a.. .,.1 RY; 3 ... _ .
.Dd du_=¢.rlz . i.`m.=_ou' ._§J ho uIDr¢.zW_w . Hr<q Ki__.mlm:!?z. UJ_\_“B H. .. .
.. :722 iwru_toii..
ln.wad_ . 1
1;.3..2.. ...".,._.11.1, ...
.1:¢.1.¢.,
1 v .I.l. ..m.....
. .. ad ¢Miih1im .rq. .v§ o..___xu n_z.». .~n E.;l ._xr. on .C_.._.zuu. >muwm: _
... ..\.}......1.
v»ln
.¥J¢_vh¢¥omz ____ ¥1_.\_»»:
.......l. .17.\._.. 1 ! 1...;.11...
mm EP Pu¢l¢._ u_.hu<.._..t&sll uxh..nla.
|.~. ..... .l. `Z.: ¢.\~ 41...|¥.1.1$.»..!..|'1..|1.»|1_...1 r.. \..,$. , 1. . 111 .1
¢a_._..<....._::..._ .a.... .w~_
310 N .
so.».~e:o._..,. _...¢.:_P:~_ 1.._1.1.,.....:.1,.2_1 ,._- ho.h$~....n pmvuvn. .$!5__2§
3 n»v_::u` . so ul_.:.xxo_a
uz_>§ ¥a!. a.$. .. . . .. . .:kx_a n._F».. .u¢' `_.._m!_
. . . 1.z»_._~b$ »:t. nh.z¢un..|a..`..\|>..<lrl.!.! :...__... N.i .\Z. .... :: nl »_F_. E.Pzre.a
1 . zi¢oJ_zo d ¢u‘§;l.= . . 2 . ram .__xv no ¢w-lnz .nn
qua¢a.: __2:_. i.:.. ..,.f.o ..n oh ..ww.om . : _SZ....S _.S:S
.___ $uz§; m ... .. .. .. o ..~ .w . z. !. .w. #_ =a..__§»
LD ȢB_._BZ._ d-_ . .
Oll'iil‘¥'d'-\¢'|
~'N_Qu._kuo_+ 1~11 am
'r
.. , 1.>_1 1 id.m.aw 1. . §3.¢&¥ 3
.. . . .....110.:¢ nw zb_»»v` .»n<. l... 1 11 .m Q, x.._..... 251 .. omdw nz_x ¢u xu_¢nu¢
. . . 1a.2_ ua$:..<! . . ._u.R ...E<¢».<n
.. any ».uu ¢.»a » .:. .
. .. .. .....H,,...Mr.:..,... . n .,.,. .HJ.H.H amn.m..n._. nonm¢mm¢.h. $._».».Q_…e."_
. . ... . . ».q§a..::_.._ . uaj.ax§.¢ 11.. nw
1. ..1..1 .. ::..l .. _a._..¥_ .... . .. .1. :_..- .. .,
..,.1.….| . _ .v».“.§ u.}._ `..:. . m ".»<a..b_.» ...a..c w uu“nh.. uu...~. § n .
. . .. . ¢oi_oo,: ,. .. 518.¢_ 2 ..
. . 11 .....: n.
.....mm.HwH. ..Qpn..~u».va_.... »¢Z.B._. m.n.wob. §.omnoww.`.ow ¢U_:z:. J.. .
552.21_.: ..1 . ... ., .u___t_o:o.... O.
...1 .f. f .i.. .. ¢unzz_. ...,1, .....> ....11... ... ¢w¢.._”_¢.
. ..~ . .. .…{.... :._¢3=. .. . . .. _ guvl_.__._"..imd. :.:SS_ .H
._d.n§ J.._“§ nu
§§ .uc_H.. ..>.vH&P . .._.~ua___d" .11... ..-?.\.:.11. .1 hn.n¢z dawson vauu.§ . . 212 N
.._.:.I£_ . . . . . . ...:_`i .l_. .
suzl.al.. :...... 1 ....;... . 11.........!1.: i... ..1..1 ¢uztah.: .. .. .1 . .- W ..
t_i 5 _ ._qu . . ..
13 _.aa,.. _ .a_a.» . ._._1..".:.5 ._.. 111 ., 1 .u..
..-..._.. ._.1. .,:......,11 1. .. .11 >3. . ..__=1:¢.~......0§ 1 3
. El_h. so u:n _» vitalian .- _. .... 2 . 520 uxr§_l .u.,. c=1.L. qua . ud“. .n m
:.z:nu :_» az oz< ¢¢x:,.__. H
do 3 .. dow...._o o . _". ... . E.._;¢ _ of 3
. w. . .. ._ _ a 34 ; ..;:.s..x
.. ,.1.1... 115 ,.,..1...1>:...1)\.__.!..$.3...1..|.1.. .u..o..."o.¥. h.c.".v.nd.mm.. .H..n.dh.:. ....z.. rn.._,_..:..e.|~w _.;i 1_.:.:. .~ .oa
3c1
.:l/'
....1 1 HHEB.UHWI\.§._?... ..._.uz.uw..f
. n z.._..m..n mo w"»..+u_..._.:.am..v a¢¢..@z¢...»».
. mo;m_b;n 1._.¢:>1
Exhibit 2
T_""TC CF§|I“.'I!\L*"._ "."CLUl'»‘|E
FOR!.\ 110 GENERAL VERchT FOR1.1
cause 1\:':-.-'_£11512 4/~ da 35 521 j
4*'!- aé¢'"$$ 7
we sure o.= rast § 'N '1'4_15 inst ci :.cLRi~
vs _ § PREC'NCT_£ PL,'~ci j _
M___/@Q?M_ § maism» couhirr 12er
V`ERD|CT
CHOOSE ONE UF THE FO‘._LOW|NG
‘.".'e. 'he Jury', find the ccfef‘cant'gui ly as charged and assess punishmen: at $
t'lne. `
FOREPE R 50 N
DATE .-'- f
amf ‘3/
.__~_-,P ;1§,_:11.'§,1, riw;q'[h»a defendant rc-t g.ii|t',.-_':,_?r;$-f¢’:x,¢é:é:¢':i . -:/M¢+Kl:’j.% C”MQ'_})
FOF’~E F‘E RSD-’.\l
lNST R'.,|'CT l: :' "-,"E R LJ l CT {Z .-l.ARG E.
C.£-.U 3 E l`~l‘_."'I.B ER
11~: THE JusT!cE couRT
oF _ Coumr, TE><.~“\S
Paimnci'___ m11¢\<:1;_
THE BTJ~`~.TE D: TE}U‘-.S
U$`J C’)‘J (-L'D
11-1¢-,0~_!10'§: of "ha .111“3:
-'1.'€€~.'.' `-;'ou 'e.rvr.‘e il i'£ your '_'u*.~;' |.L> choose from among ','0111 "urrbe' a l-c'epe‘sf>r= | fl.rt|`®r
instrL 1:? you t:- 211:.21_15'_ 1119 1:-9?91"1:`€11‘1; and amer ;-'1 -t-‘e'dir,t :1[ '1~.0: giii|‘.y.‘
l‘-ir_'r-.-"=’-rnbe" .:i_fllf:'-
.:a;e 1 cf ‘
Exhibit 3
rd“
. _ ~_ ._._E&E .*&.~M_ .__§=_5:=_5 mg Mmmrm"w __
/»lll¢.
§§ mp@v¢_¢z
YW /MM/§/M/H J/Q@
omni §§ §§ Smm.m_&~…_
§§ m§__w.+__…._._<rwa<§
_ 32 xom mcrae »wo¢
m ,
m§m t §,$S§.QQS
,V ._.: mo
v 393 &N
>.c/_Doo zow&m,_`f
xmw,_o E:oo ».:300
XOO >ml_,<a
.. .. C..F.ZIDFWE .M.><.Q..M.`.)x KMCL<
1..__
Y,,Om §Y,,%. ww§mo@. §
,. ,H._. ...h¢;r... .
§
§E§ EQ_, __
got%~ Q£§%Cttrc
THE S'I`ATE OF TEXAS
`I`o any Shcriii` or any Constable within the State of 'I`exas - GREETINGS:
Wl-IEREAS, on the 28“‘ DAY ()F OC'I`OBER, 2014, in a certain prosecution pending in the
COUNTY COUR'l` A'I` LAW of HARRISON COUNTY, TEXAS, Cause No. 2014~0801,
` wherein THE S’I'ATE OF TEXAS is Plaintift` and JACK MEY`ER is Defendant, the said
Defcndant as principal together with APPEAL BON. , as surctics, did enter into a BAIL BOND
payable to thc State of Tcxas in the penal sum oi` EICI‘I'I` HUNDRED EI,GHTY FOUR
DOLLARS (3884.00). '
CONDITIONED, that the said Dcfendant should make his personal appearance before
said Court on the 20m DAY OF,JANUARY, 2015, then and there to answer the State ot"l`exas
upon a charge by INFORMATION duly presented in said Court, wherein the said Dcfcndant is
charged with the offense of 'l`RAFFIC ()FFENSE CLASS C and there remain from day to day
and term to term, until discharged by due course,ot` law; and whereas, on the 20"~" I)AY OF
J.¢\NUARY, 2015, before said Court, then in session, said cause was called for trial, and the said
JACK MEVI£R, wholly failed to appear and answer'said accusation against him, and thereupon
thc BAII., BONI) of the said JACK MEYER, was declared forfeited by said Court, and it was
ORI)F.REI), ADJ`UDGED and .DECREED by said Court that thc State oi` Tcxas do have and
recover of the said JACK MEYER, as principai, the sum of EIGHT HUNDR_EI) EIGHTY
F()UR DOLLARS (3884.00) and of APPEAL B()Nl), as surctics, thc sum oi` ElGH'l`
HUNDRED EIGH'I`Y FOUR DOLLARS (8884.00) cach, and it was further ORDERED and
ADJ UDGED that said judgment should be made final, unless good cause should bc shown on the
Monday next after thc expiration of twenty days from the date oi" service hereof why said
Defendant did not appear.
YOU ARE THEREF()RE COMMANDED: 'l`hat. you summon the said JACK
M}<)YER, Principai, and the said APPEAL BOND, Suretics. as aforesaid, to bc and appear by
filing a written answer before the said COUN'I`Y C()UR'I` A'l` LAW oi` said HARRI,S()N
COUNTY, on or before Monday next after expiration of twenty days from thc date ot` service
hcrcol`, then and there to show cause why said forfeiture should not bc made iinal.
The officer executing this writ shall promptly scch the same according to requirements
of law, and the mandates hcreof, and make due return as the law directsl
li` this citation is not served within 90 days after date of issuancc, it shall bc returned
unscr ed.`
glssued and given un .r my hand the said of said Court at Marshall, Te.\’as, this thc
LO___ day oi` \_\/\\CM , 20 \`§
AHCS ' PATSY COX Clerk
Coun __ urt afle Harri on County, Tex s
By: M~\ \ avoids subd
. \,
l])t;,pi‘\ ty
cner CAUSF, Nt). §§ )§5' Ct°é Sci -CCL
CRIMINAL CAUSE NO. 2014~0801
SI*IERIFF’S RETURN
CAME 'l`() HAND ON THE DAY ()F , 20 AT
O’CL()CK A.M., EXEUCTEI) IN
C()UNTY, 'I`EXAS, BY DELIVERING 'I`O EACH_`W“ITHIN NAMED
l)lill`*`l€Nl)AN'l`, IN PERSON, A TRUE COPY OF THIS Cl'l`A'l`lON, TOCE'I`HER
\VI'I`H THE ACCOIVIPANYING COPY OF JUI)GMENT NISI AT THE
FOLLOWING:
NAME:
l)A'l`E:
l"LACEZ
WAS N_()`fl' EXECUTED FOR THE P`OLl.()\VlNG REASON:
CERTIFICA'I`E OF DELIVERY
I DO HE-R,EBY CERTIFY THAT I DELIVERED T()
, 0N THE DAY or _m_,
20 A’I` ()’CLOCK .l\’l. 'I`I:IIS (,`OPY OF` INSTREMENT.
'l`OiVl l\"IcCO()L, ‘HARRISON COUN’I`Y SHERIFF
BY :
DEPU'I`Y
C>(lOl€» Q`ZSQ~QU\ tCiLED
No. a/ ~ m/O¢_ JAN 2a 2015
PATsY cox, ct K wm count
\i/\Rmso u Tv.rex)is
. y BY _‘ _c-_ ocean
'f`l~{l'l STA'I`E OF 'I`EXAS )( l'N 'l HE COUNTY COURI 7\T
)(
N¢:/.//¢/j;j,$;z//¢.//é/ )( » HARRISON coUNTY,rEXAs
STATEMEN'I` OF BAILIFF
On the date shown below, the above styled and numbered case was called by the judge
for: (chcck applicable blank)
l. _____Arraignmcnt
2. _______Trial before the Court
3. ____'I`rial by jury
4. _________Revocation `Hcaring ~
5, ___B_mai i~ieanng/At»mw
The defendant did not appear.
At the behest ofthe judge presiding, and on the date shown bclow, I, acting as the duly
. qualified Bailiffof the above named court, did distinctly, and three times, call the name of the
above referenced defendant at the courthouse door, and the said defendant did not ‘respond, nor
was there an y indication from anyone that the said defendant was present
nunc ana said this M@g@_ day or W’/¢_a!_`_/M»£ ___, 20,_;§{/
ap §
d §/;W
Bailiff`$ printed name
Q.X` w w~»,
§ §§
..ll
,,.. ,,.`
.. l . ., .
,_,.»hx 1 §m<mz
§ §c»l.d= Z.
._§,E.Sz. § §§ Mm: 4 ,M ma m
\§ ..,&m ..\w\ ~
§ ...W?..~._M.;\ §§ l l i;
d
~,\ hl§~. §§ ,»....¢K\\.Q . U~.\,\..B\»m.\l
,L
M
,.'~
§
l m>€~n l ..,..g§c+ § 533
MM z§or>» 1.".<@:.`.“,<_
v . §J,m:?»¢ $UP§H~».$.»B
`. v ..,,l z l l il .- s
§ .;S_IE . . -
,w.lr,“,r:~.lnll..,§.. _,..;Swm..,_.. iii la §
v ....§>.,M , ..l:l,.ll,ll,.l ,
,,‘ ; tll¥§§€. d
civlL CAUSE No. ®\Dl€' q %50( \ QU\
CRIM!NAL CASE No. 2014-0§01
THE STA'I`E OF TEXAS )( IN THE COUNTY COUR"§§ id §§ ‘l?':v
vs. )( AT LAW HAR 16 2th
JACK MEYER
)( nARRISoN COUN'rY, TEXAS
JUDGMENT NISI
On the 20""" DAY' JANUARY, this cause was called l`or trial and thereupon came
the State of 'l`exas by her Criminal District Attorney, but the Defendant, JACK MEY’ER
failed to appear and answer in his behalf, and thereupon his name was called distinctly
three times at the door of the Courthouse, and a reasonable time given him after such call
Was made in which to appear; yet, the Said vDei`endant came not, but Wholly made default
And it appearing to the Court that the Defendant', JACK lVIEYER, together with _
APPEAL BOND, on the ZSTH DAY ()F OC'I`OBER, 2014, did enter into a BAIL
B()ND, payable to thc State of 'l`exas, in the penal sum of EIGHT I~IUNDR}§D
l?'§]C'H'l`Y I#`()UR_ DOLLARS ($884.00) conditioned that the Del:`endant, as principal,
should well and truly make his personal appearance, instanter, before the l'lonorable
County Court at Law of Harrison County, Texas, at the Courthouse of said County, in
Marshall, "l`cxas, at the present term of Said Court, and there to remain from day to day
and term to term ot` said Court until discharged by due course of law, then and there to
answer the State of "l`exas upon a charge by information therein filed accusing him of the
offense of TRAFFIC OFFENSE CLASS Cz lt is therefore considered by the Court that
the State is entitled to a forfeiture of said BAIL B()ND, and it is ORDERE|),
ADJ`UDGE-D and DECREED by the Court that the State o'l" 'l`exas do have and recover
of and from the said JACK.MEYER, Principal, the sum of EIGHT HUN.DRED
l€lGH'l`Y FOUR DOLLARS ($884.00); and in like manner that the State of 'l"eXas do
have and recover of and from the said APPEAL BOND, the sum of EIGH'I`
HUNDRED EIGHTY FOUR D()LLARS (3884.00) each, and that this judgment will
~l)e made linal unless oood cause be shown on the l\/londay next after the expiration o'l1
twenty days from the date citation is served, why said Det`endant did not appear.
lt is further ordered that an alias capias issue for 'tth-:Hd Defendar\t.
:lw§ll §., COUNTY COUR'l` A'l` l,/~\W
I'l RIS()N COUNTY, TEXAS
Exhibit 4
Certified Mail # 7008 3230 OO()?. 6288 9277
. AFFIDAVIT ()F PACT
STATE OF TEXAS
CGUNTY OP MARION
BEFORE MI:`, the undersigned Notary, ROB l ]\I U'- M OORE , on this day personally
appeared jack l'l. Meyer ol"l»OS l~louston st. jefferson, Texas 756$7, personally known to me to be a
credible person and of lawful age, who being by me first duly sworn, on his oath, deposes and says;
l received on the 2()"` ol` Mar<:h a notice oi` attempt to deliver a certified mail, #70) 2 2210 0001 9444 9626,
by the LIS Postal Scrvice. Due to the late pickup of the daily mail l was unable to secure that certified mail
at the LIS Post Oflice of jefferson "l`x. util about 4:0()pm on'the following Monday, the 23rd of March 2015‘
Upon reading that mail l discovered the judge of the Harrison County Court at Law has ordered the
“Rearrest” oi" myself l`or “Failure to appear at What appears to be a “Pre~trial Hcaring of my appeal to that
court, criminal cause No. 2015-9859~CCL (ZOl¢l_»-OSOI). ’l'he remaining hand written text on that line of
the statement ol" the Bailil`l`is unrcadable.
Also, said judge ol" said court has order the forfeiture of the 588-’¥.()0 appeal bond which l have given as
surety of my appearance before that court when notified l can only assume that the copy oi`my original
payment ol` the bond by personal checl<, dated 10/20/2014 for the sum ol` 5884.00, is included as some
kind olprool` that bond was given in this appeal However, that check was declined by the County Clerk in
l`avor ol`a bank certified check for the same amount, which was given on the 23"' ol` Oct'ol)er 2014 at a cost
to me of$SSS.OO.
"l.`he check copied and included in this notice of default can only be a copy due to the fact that my original
payment by personal check was returned to me when l turned in the certified check from the FNB jefferson
'l`x` on the 23"' ol" Oct. to and by the l'larrison county clerk, Mrs. Cox.
M}' linal and parting question to Mrs. Cox was “\vhat should l expect to be the next step in my appeal?".
Mrs. Cox stated that it would be a notice of the court of the hearing date and place \Vit.h that l returned to
jeller's<)xi 7l`x. and my personal business '
/\lso, the certified notice received on March 23"l is dated as being filed on .’vla\rch 16, 2015. This is about a
l`ull 5 months alter my notice ol` appeal and almost 2 months alter my alleged .Failure to appear. With this is
included a notice of trial on the l()"' ol`Sep_t. 2015 at; 2:30pm. This is l month short ola l`ull year since the
appeal was lilcd.
`l`o this certified notice l respond as l`ollows.
l . l object to its information as being almost totally FALSE!
Page l ol`$
l am a Sovereign Citizen of the State ofTexas and the United States ofAmerica. l have
not contracted away in any manner any of my God given and Constitutionally protected Rights. l
bring before this court “Constitut;ional Matters and lssues”. You are now required to revert to
your primary and highest duty as a “j udicial <]udge” over a judicial Court of the State of'l`cxas and
adjudicate my case and Challenge.
l have never been notified of any hearing in the matter of my appeal in this case, #201 S-9859*CCL
(2014~0801) by any means Had l been noticed of any hearing in this case l would have appeared,
for multiple reasons, the least of Which is the loss of $888.00.
In the certified notice from the Harrison County Court there is no mention that l was
notified»to appear for What I believe Was a pre~u'ial hearing, it simply states that I did not
appear, which is true. However, absent any notice of hearing it is impossible that .l. could
have appeared, and the claimed default has not happened
To be “Reanested" one must be previously arrested l have never been arrested in this
case! l have been threatened by the citing officer with arrest if l did not sign the citation
issued All citations issued, these included, have been signed “Under Duress”. Duress
being the threatened arrest by the armed officer of the la\v. `
There appears on all of the documents sent me in this certified mail post marked as being
in Shrevepon. La. On the 15"` of March NO seal of the court! Absent the seal of the court
these documents amount to nothing more than a personal letter to me, no different than a
Christmas carti.
The above mentioned certified mail documents are marked as filed on the lo‘h oi` i`vlarch
2015 and the envelope in Which they were mailed is postmarked as being in Shrevcport
La. On the 15"’ of March 20l5. May l ask how a document in a sealed envelope and in
the post office of Shreveport ila be liled a day later in Marshall Tx.‘? if the documents
filed on the l()`ch are truly stamped on that date then it is impossible for that Stamp to be
impressed through the envelope on the 15‘h and most certainly the reach of that stamp can
not be Shreveport La. The same is true of the seal of the court!
All of the above taken in sum is obviously nothing more than another blatant attempt by
the administration ofthe City ofl\/larshall "l`x. and I:la’rrison Co. Tx to engage in a
conspiracy to defraud lack I~l. Meyer of his God given and Constitutionally protected
rights '
Pave 2 of 3
b
ll.
12.
13.
The jurisdiction of my accuser and the administrative court has been challenged by me. A
challenge of jurisdiction by the creator (also the employer, also the Sovereign) leaves NO
Discretion to the created (also thc employee, also the fiction). Any challenge to any
employee is purely an administrative matter WI'l`HOUT any discretion allowed Siniply
ptit, it can not be denied or avoided by any means 'l`lie PERSONS challenged have only
two options,` prove jurisdiction or dismissal of the matter at hand. That is to say, the
person must cease what is questioned by the creator or prove where the creator has given
authority to do what is questioned
Clearly, this is not the wish of the government officials involved in this matter. lt appears
those involved wish to do whatever they believe they can get away with to avoid
admission that no jurisdiction exist and disobedience of the laws of this nation and state
’l`he SWORN duty of all public employees is to administer the law of their creator and
employer by OBEYING it.
Clcarly, those actions demonstrate that their action and lack of action is done with
knowledge that no jurisdiction exist. If this were not the case then the matter would be
quickly and efficiently resolved by simply proving jurisdiction, which no one has to date
done. "l`o the contrary, you have done all that you can to fool or coerce everyone into
believing anyone has authority over their creator and employer
You have been informed by me on repeated occasions For years now of the above information of
fact. You have had every opportunity to investigate my claims and see that justice is done but, you
do not. This lack ol` action alone is a demonstration of intentional will to break the law oi` this land.
A law l must remind you again to which there exist NO excuse ol`ignorance, and once authority is
exceeded sovereign immunity is lost.
l now repeat inv Challenge of]urisdiction ol` my accuser and the administrative courts ol`this nation
and state and request a pretrial hearing in Which this jurisdiction is proven or the case he
dismissed
l have been and remain available for appearance before the court at almost any time. l only require
timely notice of the event, in accordance with the laws of this nation and state
All Right Rescrvcd, Without Prejtidicel
All oi` the statements contained in this document are made by me from my own personal knowledge ol' the
i`acts stated therein and are true and correct to the best oi`my ability
Sworn to and subscribed before me on the Ww_zi~_/l day of ____/`/é/¢A , 2015, by
MZ/% (name of amant)
/?MMA; Q/. /\/\ nasa
Notary ._Pubiie's 31 attire
Page 3 ol` 3
w§sm~=s»
1511 C»'<'l\“fi‘ !F:€`W
cii,»v. . ‘_¥_
(@p£'a’§ “€f:=';' ~
simmj“mwwm max m
m 11 §§”‘”1
;‘¢11*:)1\»19»1 1? [3 “~
D_'@`é 1
£'_'} access 1131
E] blum mem 'e:;'zh§x:iz;z:y:‘
l;l \§;§»`
‘.Z wmc mimch
’1¢~.';"‘" ,‘rx:vn arm \~ixw\!
F‘\’§’F:rrn 03 x "L robian l \'\:T~£
..u ;11;:1€: w;~;e ‘1§3?“’
mm:mv K §
m WWM\,“
Exhibit 5
'_ CASH SOND,
v(Elt§nt§ Nc;il _Arttz§.l mata
CQ(,\r: mata ,
THE STAT§ U§'-‘TE>_£&S
CDUNW OF H§tAR§St;)N} KNG‘\ t/ ALL MEN SY THESE PRESENT5:
` mmi t ' ~t" z z
lt:>;SIS ll t~'\€~ ;;»g» tai Sum 1331v ' _
Dol arts ~cr the payment cal ».»,"ttx;':h :l:um weis and hul\; l~:t be made amd in addition alt ntamessar§~ and roa'-or“ial>tz:'fc§s and
ammust that may be incur'red w peace £`;~lfic:tm~; m managing me in me event the emtd§t§mts_ of this bond am violated {
1 tdc ii t"" mywil my haley , exacu§crs and t.dt*"uttt.~.!tdlmv §1.’:‘» lt§~' mtd §§ ~uta§ty fry miss c pra St”mts
`IHE GOND£T!ON QFTHE ABOVE OBL|GAT£O`§\£ 18 SUCH that what cas l that princigal l crain stand chang with
a mt<ssi@nt@anorle§'>"\ ts>~w§t: f , y "' , iii `
t 2 y " ’
1 ;~..-Mi 5 …M,M 001er ot Harrisf.tn'CoLGty. '1'(¢22<;3,3.v
. t~_!mris on Ccunc,g`fc»):as unlth l d:xj' of 11 »y y `
tz:, clock A M. ctr mgmt notiéts LW the Court 01 pay to the Ccm"t the pti rt:ipaz S'um `o?
‘ f ~ ' montes
.,‘:~,>z:m.; M....».._¢ _ W M. ,W _… 13 ~ :
tocatt;z<i-a.t'
1110 20:;;,
¢.-~»~ ~ .,. »,.\..
"‘z~r;£.;r't#
§:tus all hocce:;;try and :c‘;tsttnat§otc expenses incurred m atty ar'o:, tt:x' failure to appear
flow lt'_t shall and tr t§y makes 1111 ap;)eacarzcc bt;~fott) saw Court and there renta r from day to ctay and term
to term of s;id paschal ap;tca alice in ante and atl tsubscqucnt protectedth that ma;. f be had relative =0 said change trt the
comm of the criminal ;t; tlon mem on said charge this ohlégatio't shal¥ become m§<t; smertvlstzm nremair ir ft,xft fonte and `
ettecth ` X j k
Sl`glzs.:l_artd »d;¢:oci this the y 11 ' ti;;;.' of v . " 1 t .20 t ___i_ 5
Kl",lmlt>&l_ . ‘§wé:iz‘
Sigrtr;t§m€
. , . ......... Mf§.”..;;m.':@..€f_< i>:/ m
M'tzes?.
AT`;‘;; 7';" M'”' . ;, . l,; `X ‘ '_
3“¢¢ ,’;t’ H '. my . ;
C.€lt,¢; Sl>'ne, E,’,E§:
f" »"`EJ.§.»’ 1';’/- 1511 vt 1 ~1_~ jt §§ S"r 311
Dri\.-at;s L§c€zrtsez N;metzr Drivet“s Ur:ertz;e blumth l
k v/ . ~ _\" §>“.:
555 _; th ~ w /-`(. > l
Phth t‘~iumha: Ptm:te Numtjz;~r
Ftecei~.¢t:~:.i 831 .
‘."’hi§c t Br;ol<’kt:~:t¢;t»/.tr fitth z L ll _Pirt§< v )‘~.ascil~;zr Ye'tiuw ~» ’§€;§Ut‘tdatn!
Bond Nc>','
§
111
1'1»1? :»31;».11= OFTt-_;>:,t\s
THP`1 1
GAS.H;BQ.”,`~?Q’
»' 1 _ft_:_rest 13~&1'@" y
W,“.t\
'£ni)rt;/D:zte
133an m me pena ¢1.511;1\1 ot"y' .
thl§:gz~=§;, 1011 1119 1313 \i~:`tert1 of \vhi:;h Q',~L:m weil zmd italy 10 be ms`ce, .'z
'v‘~'i ~< 5“°'
am held and 1tr1nl y bound mich the SL=x§é 111
1 ` §§ 1 s ,,>"’ ) _
.,in Sxiditior.t all net:§:»;£ear§; and r§z;gor:§a§:le fé€=§ arm
exps>rzsp.s 1111>,1 may be mr urrPn" by Pea¢::e "}fftc:erz$ m rear“P;-z!ing mp in the evan§ 1119 r:c‘.ndili:)xl$> 01 this wortc§ and 1'§61319£§
1 do h nd "rwaeli my baird exemtc)z's and Pdmini`s£rai<arts it>in':l‘; md ~qe walls ny wmata was ama
THE COND\ T‘ZUN CJF `1 HE ABO\!§. OBL¥GA hON 155 SUCH that whereas 1 the prmcipal hér`eih 1312111£1` merged with
a m§§citzme“zn'tr~’f@¥on',, 113-11111; 1 t 1… 1 12 1 “ ~ z
t .»» § ' ,t
1;1.:,‘11)11'311115 :`1 t §““’ 'l’.$<)url`ul Harrison Cuutliy;`Te;£uB,
AD_ .~:i`, v
H¢urszor((.ount,z`¥‘em" mathe- .
\ 'r upon noticed 1:"> the C;>urt m gay mt the 31211`11 tim ;>rktczpal Sttm of
~ ' ' 13 " i`* `f
:da; at °““’
aims 311 1191:9§€.&1 1 and reascztat!¢= E`xpéz*\§e~> 111£1.111¢31§ 111 arm asré t 101 tai§u':a 10 ,az)pear,_
blow `l|' l
Ct;ét:z:a'w of 11112
2111: il
J!!i¥¥|\`?§l. ltv
:,h<"z§l well amf tguly makét
10 term 01 Said ;:Q§Séna§a;tp¢satar'ctz in §m‘."
axis 311 sum rfqu proceedings
1 ;.
f‘--»:»a
1 Dot§ars
rii§id,apptz;»nmtc:tz hamm said C'cur£. zir;_t§ 1?1=.')`1‘€ 112111;1111 Z§Sm day 1131 1332 5111§ mfm
hat may 122 road rt`alazl\ra w §§101 jcha¢ga.§tt m
1101’: i:e’;‘~ézd 011 5316 cl%;l#§t? 1111:1 wbltgz’sliun Sl 311 11111.1;)»1113 vuid:_ 1;1"`111?1‘/.‘:31 13 10 11311“£21¢11 111 1511 fOl‘€t': find
f
Si{;nad anaheim :111$1;1§1 say"ol 1’ “ az 1 ',21:1
Pr`n:c`l{:ta¥ "’L:mt'!j
31§11§11)1& S$gna:ure
I¢:l ,:- { f jj _;é ,;: fig ._` 313 f § 4 f
j\,j,dg! ~:;:; A’Udr@~:\$
C§t\;. Staze, 219 C§?},". State. Zip
}] x r` " iii 1551 ¢`;‘ ~’ ‘*’ U?/*:~£ jj :‘; :
Dzi\'t,s's L:t:?nzstz 1\11 tmtwr
e;'(.' ’ <"
‘§. ‘<..
Prmrt& Numbér
Whiia 1 Bt:c,kkaaper
§
Dri.»er's U»::en-»e Nt;mt§tzr
Phon-;- Number'
P1 ~tk Az.:n£tor `1’&11:1‘.'1 - Cl€<?and.qn`z
1 cAsH-sow
4 , 1111/§
ama 1~1<1. '
THE STA§ E OF `§EXAS
CGUNTY OF HAHH\SAN`P K_NCW'\' BL`L. MEN B`!' T;~EF 35
man ~1»1¢ 1551
Texn:z 111 the pérza; sum cf:
1‘)11:1111'$ 1111 1139 p§y`men; m‘ ":.'hsch sum
»11¢ ;~§§W :. ,>‘~`,\;‘
§ ,
»A:rem` Dm§~
>Coprt gate
- , w
;».»1¢,,1,~
PB§S§NTS'
am held and firmly bound 11:110 1!'1§ 3131§ §f
<. ' ~ .‘:4 >Qj,
11 §§ " 1
ve 11 and 1111!3110 be made ;1¢16 11' add tior_ all mmss;zry md reascrab! § 1131;3 and
F:<;€z'lr>e$ that may be 1111:1111§€_| 13;.' Peace Of?`i<:els 1111¢:11"31§ 1'111§ mo 11: 1110 went mo condkicn§ cjf this 1001 .d ace \»',io|axecé_
icc kind myser mv he;rz~,
11 ‘)';
executors and administrators joint!~,' and ;~121101:1|?5~1)','1?113§§ prcs§m.~;.
THE F`,.QNDW!ON OF _T'n E ABO?'E. OBL|GATION 18 SL{Ctha1"¢“1§rc:as l, the~princ§;)&l herein,'stwqd.charged`;.vith
44 z
' Court cast <=11'1301§» Cou*\t}';'Tex §
M .) v
lonal€'d 31 Harrison 65111'1£',1, Te><as. on ;he day 1;f 17 . , 2211 ,,` . ,
"‘L`) 20*_______ . 01 11;11‘1`11 mims 1)1'111§ Court 1311 pa§, 10 the Comt ike ;>rmcsp&! s1er 111
§ f v m §z:} d .M is 1,. ,…; v §Dol§am
;:iu:, 1111 11131;¢_;'=11:~1131 and '..;~15~'>11<1£_11:.=,&1;;;~1;¢1:'¢55 inr'u'i"ed m ;;N}‘ &_rr&B; im 1311111'.91»;3 appear. ,
N<;.. if 1 Sha!| . 311 and imiy marcel san appearan:.e before$
am C§ur¥ and ihere ‘P..'n_ain ?mm-d'=.\' w day amf ie?in
to imm 131 Said 131111»‘101*11“-)13;1;191111»:1 ..911'1 any end 11§|<4111)91=11;;1111.*11 man §P.r:!mgs mm ms-:gr 1211 mm fpl 111\~¢~ m =.a ': 1: h.=m;¢ 111 1¥1€1»
CC=LIYGC‘ 01'1§'10 Cfir¥§if`;§! 11".’:{101`1 lia;?€}d 01“; 311 id P‘hargc-> thus ;1;1!§131»)11"11 :,2111:11§ hemxme .'1;11$; ot¥‘§m£§e t:‘ fem,=`xin m §u\{ iowa and
cfiu:;'t. ( § 3 1 z y
31§11»1~;1311131.1&11:»3 :111-1111_~1 ` day 151 13 f"!/ .20 /
Priv»£:igga| §§11113!~¢‘
S£g;n,aimé. Signmure _/ w
g 1 , ,1 z , 1 £, j q
./`{ m ) ,1 A( 1 j 1 j .,
»'1»;11:11135§ Add:es$
» § " ¢( , 5 j j / jj , ` _ fbi “ l »" ), x “'_
C;r~,'. Stme. Z;:
v ( g w x ` -§,' 7 .4,?
Dri'.»s+r‘s L§»::emse, Nmnnez Djive.r`§ L%c§r;s§ Number
f s j 1 ~1}
F’:`u:\ne Mumber
`1"!11€1»3 ~ E~:)c:%.k§se:)€~.il Grép:»n - Dz‘~
thz.ae Number
PZ*\S< - 13111::%1111' v\1=, 1..'1'1' - §§.=,:`Fmd= m
,cAsH §§11112
§§.§§
1
' §§
§§§
Bond `1~'11;1,
THE ST§§_`I'E @FTEX.»'A3
Arre:=1Da1a l
`C§11r1 ')ate f
51331111“`1‘ C_>F HAZB13DN1KN§1‘) 1=11.1. mm 311 THE§E PRESENTS;
iHATl 1 §
13le5 §rs 1113 pi;~11$1§ 31.§_m 91
mm am mr the psympnr 1111111'111:1=. sum 111131§a11d 111113¢1»:1 1313 made and.
add tier 311 necessary and reasorgblc fees and `*
expen§e§ 1131 11 3111 11»,&111<:1.111&1:11;1‘ Peace C'ffhccra 111 roj;~r naming 1119 111 11111 worn 1110 c0111'_111113115 011111;~, 1101 101 we violated
1 dc 11: 1112 1113141=111 my héirs `€=..1`<131:11;015 and armimsm\wr$ 1011111; anda
avafaly b`~ 1113£ ¢3 pras_ ernst
YHE GDNDIT101`1 OFTHE PBOVE OBL!GAT©N |$ SUCH mm 1'»1'1011,:1=~ 1 the ¢nnc1;131_ here 11 manci chargeo` ._1111'1 _
)~1¢ / 1111 f ~/ »’. .\» {/, 111 ’i 1’» a ;.;/"
§ ' 311
1311.11»1 1 s.\'sarihrz,tl .\'izl e§x:war 1;'.';§111€1111§ if ?1»“ 'j’ 3 ” ‘> “ Court of Harrisor' County 113an
`11°§.¢§,11 1331 1-'1.=111"1301113<;11111-,,`11:):;15, on 1119 1;1331;1 /’ 1 1 " » 1 ,
0 dock A M.,
" ski "»`
pwa~ 311 11
;1_1':;~'.11,» arm 1411- :,1111;,11;1111 s-x;_:an:~;e$ inrzrrrier;i in amf ar'esc f-“
or noon nance by the Court. 131 pay 10 me Court tre ;:>1"1111::11:1&1 wm 1-111
,\W'",
4 1 33 m 15 1 De:)i 11119.
-' 131|111”&11;1 appear.
11!011,1 11 1 511;».111 1113 11 and .;.1r111 1 makes said appearance hefo_rg. t1115 Coud and ihere mmam mm 1;_1"1,'1'1 day :,~11'1§ 1ar,rr~1;f /
101211"1 €11?£31'.') pala&nal apps§§;i`;s:\€>~ 111 .»311'_.1 ar 11 311 .~.1111§1-:»1111€1.11;¢ f:-mr.arddmg$ 11*»:_11 may lie had 11=11.»,11\~9. m .;H:r§ aharg+z’§H-H`s€§
1:0_1,`1&',8 crime 1211 19‘1’§11£11 action based 1111 Said charga. ihi:; obliga§mn 511'1=11§.;'130011'1»;1 ~.'r..id; 011113¢'.».3'59. m remain 11111111 force and
Dzivar";§ Lk;en§e .N 1111'113&1'
§§ 3 1 3 1
11 1(,§*
1111-313 11111'1111;131
am
`4
r§ /5.
131€11;<3111€1¢1 1331
‘.’."1`11113 » 13031<§1;68;:113§ Ere»ari - DA
§:ffoc€i _ . l
Signeé and 6:'111::1'1 11113 1123 w7_3<11_1\,1 131 f~ 3 _>1' , 120
&LUQ'B_»‘-L§ w
`5:’ w ' " » »‘ ` 55 M , ...." … _ 1 MW.. .w
>':$igr{:§¥wé Sign€rmiq -1 1 ' wl M‘
» 1 x 1 ' 1 , 11
4 13 /.1 .,. 1 ,11" _ ‘~ ,~» § 1»*»` » /: `°"¥
wares/s Add:eas “'
1 ", x 3 96 3 1 , 1~ v 1 1
~~ y F» “ jj m: ‘ 11 1 1 ' ' "`~” »1““1»:1 ”‘ j. g 33 f
C;x_~_ gram 211: 13113'1. 81;11@. Z:;:
. A"` ' 1 ' » g w 1°""" 11 1 11 1 ; d §
3 13 g 333 131 72 33 13 f <?;, 51 1 w , 03- M §
Dri"ers Uce.nse Num$:Ȏr
\Phrme Nr,kqber‘ v
Pi.wk ~ +‘11.':§:2101' \’P.$$:~.v» - Safenri,=.m