Opinion

Jose A. Perez v. Texas Medical Board and Mari Robinson, JD, in Her Official Capacity

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Filed
Feb 19, 2015
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 3.1%

regarding parallel provisions of former appellate rules

How later courts described this case

  • regarding parallel provisions of former appellate rules

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ACCEPTED

03-14-00644-CV

4212534

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

2/19/2015 1:33:44 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

No. 03-14-00644-CV

FILED IN

3rd COURT OF APPEALS

__________________________________________________________________

AUSTIN, TEXAS

2/19/2015 1:33:44 PM

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS JEFFREY D. KYLE

AUSTIN, TEXAS Clerk

JOSE A. PEREZ

Appellant

Vs.

TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD and MARI ROBINSON JD, in her Official Capacity

Appellees.

MOTION TO ABATE AND AMEND APPELLATE BRIEF

Jose A. Perez, respectfully moves the Court to Abate and respectfully seeks

leave of Court to Amend the Appeal. As grounds therefore he shows:

1- By letter dated February 17th, 2015 the Third District Court of Appeals Clerk

informed Mr. Perez that the clerk filed a Supplemental Record. Mr. Perez

has contemporaneously requested that a copy of the same be provided to him

2- Mr. Perez has no idea what information the referenced record contains nor

the reason the same was not provided prior to Mr. Perez filing his initial

appellate brief.

3- The Third District Court1 has previously stated that:

The rules further instruct us to construe the briefing requirements "liberally"

and that "substantial compliance" is sufficient, as the point of having briefs in

the first place is merely to "acquaint the court with the issues in a case and to

present argument that will enable the court to decide the case" and not to

impose formal requirements as ends in themselves. Id. R. 38.9. The rules

further contemplate that appellate courts will afford parties the opportunity to

cure any formal or substantive briefing defects before disposing of the appeal

based on such a defect rather than the merits. See id.; see also Inpetco, Inc. v.

Texas Am. Bank/Houston, 729 S.W.2d 300, 300 (Tex. 1987) (regarding parallel

provisions of former appellate rules). Finally, "[a] brief may be amended or

supplemented whenever justice requires, on whatever reasonable terms the

court may prescribe." See Tex. R. App. P. 38.7.

Wherefore he respectfully moves the court to abate the appeal and to grant

leave to amend his initial appellate brief. .

Respectfully Submitted,

_______Jose A. Perez__/S/_______________

34 Candle Pine Place

The Woodlands, TX 77381

theaesculapius@gmail.com

281-673-0452

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

A telephonic conference with Mr. Ross was held on February 19th, 2017 @

2:00 PM regarding the merits of the instant motion and he stated that he objected.

__________Jose A Perez__/s/____

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1Majeed v. Hussain, No. 03-08-00679-CV (Tex.App. Dist.3 10/22/2010) citing See Tex. R. App.

P. 38.7

It is hereby certified that a copy of the foregoing “ Plaintiff’s Motion To

Abate Appeal ” was served by emailing a copy thereof via the State efiling

system on this 19th Day of February 2015 to:

Ted A Ross, Esq

Assistant Attorney General

PO Box 12548

Austin, TX 78711-2548

ted.ross@texasattorneygeneral.gov

__________Jose A Perez__/s/____

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.