Opinion

Christopher Dewa Washington v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Jan 28, 2015
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

NO. 01-14-00366-CR

FILED IN

1st COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 1/28/2015 10:02:56 PM

FORTHE FIRST CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS Clerk

HOUSTON, TEXAS

CHRISTOPHER WASHINGTON, Appellant

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

on Appeal from thc 178rli Judicial District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1259853

APPELLANT'S MOTION F'OR EXTENSION OF'TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO TIJN I{ONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COLIRT

COMES NOW, CIIRISTOPIIER WASIIINGTON, Appellant and files

this, his Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief and for good cause

would show the Court as follows:

Appellant's brief was due on January 26, 2015. Appellant is turning the

brief in along with this Motion to Extend Time on January 28,2015. Counsel

would request an extension of 1wo days. During the last 30 days Counsel has been

busy on the following matter alongside the Appellant's Brief:

l. Efrain. Lopez v. State of Texas, in cause nurnberl4- 14-0075 8-CR, an appeal

out of the Courl of Appe als for the Fourteenth Judicial District of Texas-

Houston. This case involves a non-death capital appeal ou1 of the 179t1'

Districl Court of Harris County, Texas. The appeal sterns from a week long

lrial. The brief in this case is due on February 2"d, 2075. Counsel is

working diligently to rneet that deadline.

2. In re Michael Glynn Brov,n, cause nurnber 13-35892-I'14-1 , in the United S1a1es

Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. f'his case involves the

bankruplcy proceedings of Michael Glynn Brown's estale, and an investigation

into the location of his assets. Counsel has a hearing scheduled in this case on

January 29,2015. This case involves 1,000s ofpages ofdiscovery which must be

reviewed in order to prepare for the hearing. Counsel is working on getting

prepared fol that hearing.

3. United States v. Ramola Brown, 4:12-CR-00366, in the United States District

Court for the Southern Districl of Texas Houston Division, This case involves a

federal marijuana and cocaine distribution conspiracy based out ofHouston,

Texas. The trial in this case started on January 27,2015 and is expected to last

until January 30,2015. Counsel has been revicwing documents, talking to

witnesses, and preparing for llial over the last 1wo weeks.

WIIEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, appellant respectfully prays

that the couft granl this rnotion and extend the tirne for filing his brief for two days

until January 28,2015

2

Respcctfully submitted,

WENDDL M, JR

Texas Bar No. 15208500

440 Louisiana Strcct, Suitc 200

Ilouston, Texas 77002

(113)223-ss75

(713)224-28tsFAX

CII,RTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certily that a lrue and correct copy of the foregoing Motion was

delivered to the Court of Appeals, a copy being faxed to the Assistant District

Attomey in this cause on this the 28tl'day of January, 2015.

NDELL A. DO JR.

3

STATE OF TEXAS $

s

COUNTY OF HARRIS s

On this day personally appeared WENDI'LL A. ODOM, JR., who s1a1ed under

oath as follows:

"My name is WENDELL ODOM. I am the attomey of record fol the Appellanl in

this cause. I have read the foregoing Motion for an Extension of Time to File Appcllant's

Bricf, and swear that the natters contained in such motion are h'ue and coruecl."

G

WENDELL M,JR.

SwoRN To AND SUBSCRIBED before me on this the &X of

2015, to which witness my hand and seal ofoffice.

iIARY C T,|iOORE

**i,?'"'""*'^llSdB]tli3'il:'o' NOTARY UBLI I AND FOR

TI{E ST E OF TEXAS

SEPT. 3, 2016

4

NO. 01-14-00366-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIRST

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

CHRISTOPHER WASHINGTON, Appellant

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from thc 1781'Ir Judicial District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1259853

OITDER

On this day came on to be heard Appellant's Motion for Extcnsion of Timc

within which to File Appcllant's Brief.

It is the opinion of this Court that the Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant's

Bricf should be and is hereby GRANTED, and it is therefore ORDERED that the

Appellant's Brief is due to be filed in tlis Coutl on day of

2015.

SIGNED on this the day of 2015

.IT]DGE PRI,SIDING

5

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.