Opinion

Board of Regents, Texas State University System, and Texas State University-San Marcos v. Stephanie Paige Steinbach

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Filed
Jan 5, 2015
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

ACCEPTED

03-14-00326-CV

3655061

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

1/5/2015 4:18:00 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

CAUSE NO. 03-14-00326-CV

FILED IN

3rd COURT OF APPEALS

BOARD OF REGENTS, TEXAS § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

STATE UNIVERSITY and § 1/5/2015 4:18:00 PM

TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY - § JEFFREY D. KYLE

SAN MARCOS, § Clerk

Appellants, §

§

V. § THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

§

STEPHANIE PAIGE STEINBACH §

Appellee. § AUSTIN DIVISION

UNOPPOSED SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW Appellants Board of Regents, Texas State University and

Texas State University–San Marcos, by and through the undersigned Assistant

Attorney General, and files this its Unopposed First Motion for Extension of Time

to File Appellant’s Reply Brief; and would show the Court as follows:

1. Appellants are Board of Regents, Texas State University and Texas State

University–San Marcos. Appellee is Stephanie Paige Steinbach.

2. Appellants’ reply brief is currently due on January 9, 2015.

Cause No. 10-0281; Stephanie Steinbach vs. Board of Regents, Texas State University System and Texas State University - San Marcos

Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Reply Brief Page No. 1

3. This Unopposed Second Motion to Extend Time is filed before the deadline

to file the reply brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(d).

4. Appellants have contacted attorney for Appellee, and he is unopposed to

this Motion.

5. Pursuant to Rules 10.5(b) and 38.6(d) of the Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure, Appellants move this Court for a 30 day extension of time to file

Appellants’ brief, extending the deadline to February 9, 2015.

6. Appellants seek an extension of time to file their brief because counsel for

Appellants is leaving the Office of Attorney General effective January 9, 2015. In

addition, Appellants’ counsel was out of state over the holidays and was also out of

the office several days in December 2014 for medical reasons.

PRAYER

For these reasons, Appellants ask the Court to grant an extension of time to

file their reply brief, thereby extending the deadline to February 9, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

KEN PAXTON

Attorney General of Texas

CHARLES E. ROY

First Assistant Attorney General

DAVID C. MATTAX

Deputy Attorney General for Defense Litigation

Cause No. 10-0281; Stephanie Steinbach vs. Board of Regents, Texas State University System and Texas State University - San Marcos

Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Reply Brief Page No. 2

KARA L. KENNEDY

Chief, Tort Litigation Division

/s/ Kamilla L. Stokes

KAMILLA L. STOKES

Assistant Attorney General

State Bar No. 00792259

P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711-2548

(512) 463-2197

Fax (512) 457-4436

Kamilla.stokes@texasattorneygeneral.gov

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I hereby certify that on the 5th day of January, 2015, I contacted Mark

Cusack, attorney for Appellee, and he is unopposed to this Second Motion for

Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Reply Brief.

/s/ Kamilla L. Stokes

KAMILLA L. STOKES

Assistant Attorney General

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify compliance with Tex. R. Civ. P. 21. A true and correct

copy of the foregoing instrument has been served on all counsel, by electronic

transmission to the electronic mail address on file with the electronic filing manager

Rule 21a(1). If a party has not designated an electronic mail address with the

electronic filing manager, the party was served a true and correct copy of the

foregoing instrument in person, by mail, by commercial delivery service by fax or

by email, or by such other manner as the Court in its discretion may direct. Rule

21a(2). Service was made on all parties as provided on January 5, 2015.

Cause No. 10-0281; Stephanie Steinbach vs. Board of Regents, Texas State University System and Texas State University - San Marcos

Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Reply Brief Page No. 3

Via Electronic Service & E-Mail

Mr. Mark Cusack

242 North Guadalupe Street

San Marcos, Texas 78666

cusacklaw@centurytel.net

/s/ Kamilla L. Stokes

KAMILLA L. STOKES

Assistant Attorney General

Cause No. 10-0281; Stephanie Steinbach vs. Board of Regents, Texas State University System and Texas State University - San Marcos

Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Reply Brief Page No. 4

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.