Opinion

Mandry v. Brown Cracker & Candy Co.

  • 248 S.W. 1095
Court
Court of Appeals of Texas
Filed
Feb 21, 1923
Status
Published
Author
Cobbs
On the bench
Cobbs
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 83.9%

The opinion

COBBS, J.

The transcript in this ease was filed on the 17th day of July, 1922. The case was set down in its regular order for submission on the 14th day of February, 1923. Appellants filed their brief on the 12th day of February, 1923. two days before its submission. Appellee filed no brief, but filed a written motion on the 10th day of February, 1923, two days previous to the time when the appellants filed their brief to dismiss the appeal. Appellants filed no reply to the motion, and it comes before us solely on the motion to dismiss the appeal which violates the practice in such cases prescribed by article 2115, R. S., and rules 38, 40 ( 230 S. W. viii ) and 102 of the Texas court rules prepared by the Supreme Court for the preparation of cases on appeal. These rules have been violated in preparing this case for appeal, and the appellee is clearly within its legal rights in presenting this motion. Weston v. Patterson (Tex. Civ. App.) 165 S. W. 1195 , opinion by Justice Moursund. Attorneys should do well to bear this case in mind when filing transcripts.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.