Opinion

Holder v. Washington County Assessor, Tc-Md 080360b (or.tax 2-5-2009)

Court
Oregon Tax Court
Filed
Feb 5, 2009
Status
Published
On the bench
JEFFREY S. MATTSON, MAGISTRATE.
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.5%

The opinion

DECISION OF DISMISSAL

A case management conference was held October 14, 2008. Tomoko U. Holder participated on her own behalf. Jack W. Graff and Parker Van Slyke appeared for Defendant. Subsequently, written submissions were filed; the record closed December 17, 2008

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

The subject property, identified as Account R2017874, is a single-family residence located in Beaverton, Oregon. For the 2007-08 tax year, Plaintiff appealed to the Washington County Board of Property Tax Appeals. The real market value (RMV) for the property was reduced from $730,600 to $677,155. The maximum assessed value (MAV) was sustained at $576,620. Plaintiff remains focused on the increase in her tax bill through the years. Defendant explained that was due, in part, to "[t]wo new bond measures and one local option levy [that] were approved by voters for 2007." (Def's Ltr at 2, Nov 18, 2008.)

During the case management conference, Plaintiff said she was seeking a decrease of $50,000 in RMV. Despite requests for additional information from Defendant and from the court, 1 Plaintiff did not supply further details to support her request for that RMV decrease. *Page 2

II. ANALYSIS

Plaintiff seeks a reduction in the RMV from $677,155 to $627,155. Even if she were to receive such relief, the revised total would remain above the Defendant's record assessed value of $576,620. As such, no tax change would occur and there would be no refund. Therefore, there is no real tax impact to the dispute; Plaintiff is not aggrieved.

So long as the property's maximum assessed value is less than its real market value, the taxpayer is not aggrieved within the meaning of ORS 305.275 (2007). Parks Westsac L.L.C. v. Dept. of Rev. , 15 OTR 50 (1999). Since there is no aggrievement, the case must be dismissed.

III. CONCLUSION

Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the appeal is dismissed.

Dated this _____ day of February 2009.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR.

Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Decision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed.

This document was signed by Magistrate Jeffrey S. Mattson on February 5, 2009. The Court filed and entered this document on February 5, 2009.

1 See Journal Entry dated October 17, 2008. *Page 1

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.