Opinion

Opinion No.

Court
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Filed
Dec 8, 1983
Status
Published
On the bench
MICHAEL C. TURPEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 43.7%

The opinion

OPINION — AG — ** SALES TAX — COUNTY COMMISSIONERS — EARMARK PURPOSE ** (1) HOUSE BILL NO. 1018 (CODIFIED AS 68 O.S. 1370 [ 68-1370 ]) DOES 'NOT' AUTHORIZE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO EITHER CALL OR HOLD A COUNTY SALES TAX ELECTION PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE COUNTY SALES TAX ACT, JANUARY 1, 1984. (2) IN PREPARING THE RESOLUTION CALLING FOR AN ELECTION AND IN PREPARING THE BALLOT, A BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IS REQUIRED TO DISTINCTLY SPECIFY THE PURPOSE OF THE TAX LEVY. THIS PURPOSE MUST BE ONE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF SECTION 2(C) OF HOUSE BILL NO. 1018, AND ONE PROPERLY DELEGATED TO THE COUNTY. (3) REVENUE DERIVED FROM A SALES TAX LEVIED FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE MAY 'NOT' BE USED FOR ANOTHER PURPOSE. (ARTICLE X, SECTION 19) (EFFECTIVE DATE OF STATUTE, EMERGENCY CLAUSE, EARMARKING OF COUNTY SALES TAX REVENUE, GENERAL OPERATIONS, COUNTY PURPOSE) CITE: ARTICLE X, SECTION 19 OPINION NO. 83-132, ARTICLE V, SECTION 32, ARTICLE V, SECTION 46, ARTICLE V, SECTION 59, ARTICLE X, SECTION 20, "CAYWOOD V. CAYWOOD, 541 P.2d 188 (1975)" OPINION NO. 82-086) (GEORGE R. BARR JR.) SEE: OPINION NO. 87-066 (1987)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.