Opinion

Opinion No. (1985)

Court
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Filed
Nov 4, 1985
Status
Published
On the bench
MICHAEL C. TURPEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Dear Honorable Nigh,

The Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion, asking:

"If the Legislature proposes a measure to the people which amends the Oklahoma Constitution and does not provide that a special election be held for that purpose, may the Governor order a special election to put the proposed measure to the people for their approval or rejection?"

We note that this Opinion only addresses constitutional amendments proposed by the Legislature. Okla. Const. Article XXIV , Section 1

prescribes the method by which the Constitution may be amended pursuant to a Legislative proposal. It states, in pertinent part:

"Any amendment or amendments to this Constitution may be proposed in either branch of the Legislature, and if the same shall be agreed to by a majority of all the members elected to each of the two (2) houses, such proposed amendment or amendments shall, with the aye and nays thereon, be entered in their journals and referred by the Secretary of State to the people for their approval or rejection, at the next regular general election, except when the Legislature, by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of each house, shall order a special election for that purpose."

This constitutional provision has been interpreted in several cases. In State v. State Board of Equalization , 230 P.743 (Okla. 1924), the Oklahoma Supreme Court wrote:

"The Constitution prescribes the method by which it may be amended, and the procedure so prescribed is the measure of the power to amend. The provisions of the Constitution for its own amendment are mandatory and binding, not only upon the Legislative Assembly, but also upon all the people as well; . . . for the constitutional provision supra, which rises superior to all attempted legislative enactment, expressly provides how such an amendment agreed to shall be submitted to the people, and that is, omitting the exception, where a majority of each house agrees to an amendment, it shall be referred at a general election by the secretary of state." Id . at 749.

Clearly, Okla. Const. Article XXIV , Section 1 prescribes two ways that a date is established calling for an election to submit an amendment to the Constitution to the people of Oklahoma for their approval or rejection. One way is for the Legislature, upon two-thirds (2/3) vote of each house, to order a special election to be held. Absent that ordering of a special election by the Legislature, such election will be held at the next regular general election.

These are the only methods prescribed for establishing a date calling for an election to submit an amendment to the Constitution proposed by the Oklahoma Legislature. The Governor plays no role in either method.

It is, therefore, the official opinion of the Attorney General that the Governor may not order a special election to place a Constitutional amendment proposed by the Legislature to a vote of the people for their approval or rejection. Okla. Const. Article XXIV , Section 1 mandates that any amendment to the Constitution, proposed by the Legislature, be submitted to the people for their approval or rejection, at the next regular general election, except when the Legislature, by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of each house, orders a special election for that purpose .

MICHAEL C. TURPEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA

RICHARD MILDREN, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.