Opinion

State Ex Rel. Roshon v. Auble

  • 130 Ohio St. 485
  • 130 Ohio St. (N.S.) 485
  • 5 Ohio Op. 102
  • 200 N.E. 507
  • 1936 Ohio LEXIS 368
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 4, 1936
Status
Published
On the bench
Weygandt, Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day, Zimmerman
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

This cause came on to be heard upon the motion of the relator for judgment on the pleadings, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged that the petition be dismissed at the costs of the respondents, it appearing from the pleadings and statement of counsel that the relator is entitled to the office, has been appointed to the office since this proceeding was instituted, is now in office, and the respondents are not contesting his incumbency.

Petition dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.