Opinion

State Ex Rel. Universal Realty Co. v. Brown

113 Ohio St. 698
113 Ohio St. (N.S.) 698
150 N.E. 755
1925 Ohio LEXIS 254

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Jun 16, 1925
Status: Published
On the bench: Marshall, Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade, Robinson
Cited by: 1 cases
Authority: More cited than 85.1%

The opinion

The court finds that the plaintiff is not entitled to a writ of mandamus as prayed for in the petition, for the reason that the transaction is one in which other persons are concerned and other interests involved, and the relief sought cannot be afforded by a writ of mandamus.

Writ denied.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.