Opinion

Orellana v. Zellar

  • 119 F. App'x 693
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Jan 26, 2005
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Benavides, Per Curiam, Stewart, Wiener
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 5.3%

The opinion

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 26, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

No. 04-40732

Summary Calendar

SAMUEL ORELLANA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES B. ZELLAR, SR., Warden;

Unidentified SQUIER, Sargent;

EARL A. BRIDGEFORTH, Correctional

Officer III; BYRONE L GRANT,

Correctional Officer; BRENDA D.

SPITALERI, Correctional Officer,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(9:03-CV-91-HWM)

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Samuel Orellana, Texas prisoner # 1008987,

appeals the summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint. We affirm.

The district court did not err in its summary-judgment,

qualified-immunity determination that Orellana had not established

the violation of a clearly established constitutional right on

*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

either his denial-of-access-to-the-courts or retaliation claims

because he failed to argue or demonstrate that his ability to

pursue a “nonfrivolous,” “arguable" legal claim was hindered by the

defendants’ actions. Christopher v. Harbury, 536 U.S. 403, 415

(2002) (citations omitted); see Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299,

311 (5th Cir. 1997).

Further, the district court did not err in dismissing the

claims against defendant Spitaleri pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e

for Orellana’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Texas

has a two-step administrative grievance procedure for state

inmates. Wendell v. Asher, 162 F.3d 887, 891 (5th Cir. 1998). The

record shows that the grievances filed by Orellana do not mention

Spitaleri. Accordingly, Orellana did not exhaust the available

administrative remedies regarding his claims against Spitaleri.

AFFIRMED.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.