Opinion

State v. Riggins

  • 91 Ohio App. 3d 350
  • 632 N.E.2d 922
  • 1993 Ohio App. LEXIS 5136
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Oct 29, 1993
Status
Published
Author
Brogan
On the bench
Brogan, Wolff, Fain
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 61.8%

The opinion

Brogan, Judge.

The appellant, David Riggins, was convicted of rape after a jury trial in the Clark County Common Pleas Court. His conviction was affirmed by this court. He filed a motion to vacate his conviction because he contended that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to properly investigate the case against him. The trial court overruled appellant’s motion without further explanation.

In his single assignment, the appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion without making necessary findings of fact and conclusions of law. We agree.

Findings of fact and conclusions of law are mandatory under R.C. 2958.21 if the trial court dismisses the petition.

State v. Lester

(1975), 41 Ohio St.2d 51 , 70 O.O.2d 150 , 322 N.E.2d 656 ;

State v. Mapson

(1982), 1 Ohio St.3d 217, 219 , 1 OBR 240, 242, 438 N.E.2d 910, 912 ;

State ex rel. Brown v. Court

(1986), 23 Ohio St.3d 46 , 23 OBR 122, 491 N.E.2d 303 . The assignment is well taken.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Wolff and Fain, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.