Opinion

Kovalchuck v. Simpson & Brown

  • 117 N.J.L. 400
  • 189 A. 89
  • 1937 N.J. LEXIS 176
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Jan 22, 1937
Status
Published
On the bench
PER CURIAM.
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 54.7%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation act. The question at issue is whether the death of the employe was the result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. The bureau, the Court of Common Pleas and the Supreme Court resolved this question in favor of the employer. We find it unnecessary to review the evidence. Suffice it to say, that where, as here, the testimony is susceptible of conflicting inferences, the findings of fact by the Supreme Court are conclusive on appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

For affirmance

— -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.

For reversal

— None.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.