Opinion

State Ex Rel. Titus v. Peacock

  • 125 Fla. 452
  • 170 So. 127
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Oct 14, 1936
Status
Published
On the bench
Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford, Davis
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 67.8%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

— The return of respondent, J. E. Peacock, avers that it is impossible for the respondents, as a County Canvassing Board, to now identify and undertake to subtract from the results of the completed canvass of votes cast for the office of Justice of the Peace of the Eighth Justice District of Volusia County the unchallenged out of State absentee ballots that are alleged to have been unlawfully cast and counted under Chapter 16986, Acts of 1935, for the relator and his opponent for the Democratic nomination to the office of Justice of Peace as commanded by the alternative writ, even if said Chapter 17986 should be adjudged unconstitutional as claimed in this proceeding.

*453

Such return presents a good defense inasmuch as inability of respondents to comply with the commands of an alternative writ of mandamus occasioned by happenings over which they presently have no control, operates as a lawful justification for failure to comply with its commands. County Com’rs of Duval County v. City of Jacksonville, 36 Fla. 196 , 18 Sou. Rep. 339 , 29 L. R. A. 416.

The return is adjudged sufficient and relator required to join issue thereon, in default of which the alternative writ will be quashed and the proceeding dismissed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.