Opinion

Ronald v. Ryan

  • 157 Fla. 470
  • 26 So. 2d 339
  • 1946 Fla. LEXIS 773
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
May 28, 1946
Status
Published
Author
Buford
On the bench
Adams, Brown, Buford, Chapman, Sebring, Terrell, Thomas
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 62.6%

The opinion

BUFORD, J.:

This suit was instituted in the court below by petition for Declaratory Judgment.

The relators were The Halifax Drainage District of Volusia County, Florida, and the duly elected and qualified Supervisors of Halifax Drainage District together with certain landowners in the District.

*471

The petition challenged the constitutionality of Chapter 22968, Special Acts of 1945. No attack is made challenging legislative procedure by which the Act was passed.

The contention presented is that the Act is unconstitutional because it prevents the duly elected and qualified Supervisors of the Drainage District from completing their term of office and delegates the duties of such officers to the Board of County Commissioners of Volusia County and deprives the land-owners of the Drainage District of the right of local self-government. Drainage Districts are creatures of the legislature. The Halifax Drainage District was organized under the general Drainage District Law. Such districts are, in the broad sense, municipal organizations but they do not fall within the provisions of Section 8, Article VIII of our Constitution because that was intended to apply to such municipal corporations as cities and towns.

For a statute to be held unconstitutional it must be shown to be contrary to expressed or necessarily implied prohibitions found in the State or Federal Constitutions. See State v. Pearson, 153 Fla. 314 , 14 So. (2nd) 565 ; Taylor v. Dorsey, 155 Fla. 305 , 19 So. (2nd) 876 , and cases there cited. The petition in these cases entirely fails to meet this rule.

The Declaratory Decree holding Chapter 22968 Special Acts of 1945 valid should be affirmed on authority of Landis v. Readon, et al., 114 Fla. 755 , 154 So. 868 ; State v. Carlton, 103 Fla. 810 , 138 So. 612 ; Amos v. Mathews 99 Fla. 1 , 126 So. 308 and Garrett v. Whitehurst, 122 Fla. 484 , 165 So. 691 .

It is so ordered.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, THOMAS, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.