Opinion

State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Love

  • 91 Fla. 1024
  • 109 So. 222
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Jun 2, 1926
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Ellis, Terrell-, Buford
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

*1025

Per Curiam.

— Rule nisi was granted in the above entitled cause upon the petition of Robert H. Anderson as acting chairman of the State Board of Law Examiners, et als., for writ of prohibition, which petition, inter alia, alleged that H. M. Shaw had applied for and sued out alternative writ of mandamus before the Circuit Judge of the Second Circiut, commanding said Board to permit him to stand the examination to be held in Tallahassee on February 15,1926, and had said writ served when said Board was in session holding an examination of applicants for admission to the Bar. Rule nisi was granted by this court addressed to the Circuit Judge issuing the alternative writ of mandamus and to the petitioner, H. M. Shaw, in whose behalf the same had been issued. Subsequently, suggestion of the death of the respondent, H. M. Shaw, has been filed in this court, which makes it necessary that the rule nisi be discharged and the proceedings dismissed.

Rule nisi discharged and proceedings dismissed:

Brown, C. J., -and .Whitfield, ■ Ellis, Terrell- and Buford, J. J., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.