Opinion

Holt v. City of Mobile

  • 16 Ala. App. 597
  • 80 So. 171
  • 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 272
Court
Alabama Court of Appeals
Filed
Nov 26, 1918
Status
Published
Author
Brown
On the bench
Brown
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 43.8%

The opinion

BROWN, P. J.

The only question presented on the record is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to authorize the judgment of conviction. There was some evidence tending to show that the defendant was in charge of the place where the officers found liquor stored, and in a building that was not used exclusively for a dwelling, Jones v. Montgomery, ante, p. 357, 77 South. 969 ; Conner v. State, ante, p. 452, 78 South. 715 ; Holt v. State, ante, p. 399, 78 South. 315 .

The testimony was given ore tenus before the court, sitting without a jury, and we are unable to say from the evidence in the record that the conclusion of the trial court is plainly and palpably contrary to the great weight of the evidence. Union Mut. Aid Ass’n of Mobile v. Carroway, 201 Ala. 414 , 78 South. 732 ; Smith v. Thomas, 201 Ala. 442 , 78 South. 820 ; Mulligan v. State, 15 Ala. App. 204 , 72 South. 761 .

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.