Opinion

W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Yarbrough

  • 27 Ala. App. 595
  • 176 So. 835
  • 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 154
Court
Alabama Court of Appeals
Filed
Oct 5, 1937
Status
Published
Author
Bricken
On the bench
Bricken
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This is the second application for certiorari in this case. The first is reported in ante, p. 229, 169 So. 337 .

At the second trial, additional evidence was introduced. The trial court found as a fact that Leslie Yarbrough was employed by W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Company at the time he was injured. The only question before us on this issue, which is the principal matter of controversy, is whether there was any legal evidence to support the findings of fact by the trial-court. We have carefully reviewed the record and the opinion of the trial court which clearly analyzes the testimony. The opinion here prevails that there is legal evidence in the record, which is set out in the opinion of the court below, that is. sufficient to support the conclusion reached. We are not called upon to weigh conflicting evidence in this proceeding. Other questions raised do not substantially affect the conclusion reached by the trial court.

Certiorari denied; judgment affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.